"Normal" Upgrade Times

Subscribe
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
Page 5 of 8
Go to
Quote: There will be a significant realignment bid next month - 2-3 bases will close. That will cause a HUGE ripple effect throughout the system as senior guys move to MEM kicking them out and the more junior guys bump all those junior captains on the 777 and 767 and more and more. Realignment bids while we are shrinking the system will be hugely negative - a LOT of guys are going to get moved.

Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.

If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
Dafuq? 2-3 bases closing? Are we also furloughing 1000 guys too??? Maybe one base is closing: ANC11.
Reply
Quote: There will be a significant realignment bid next month - 2-3 bases will close. That will cause a HUGE ripple effect throughout the system as senior guys move to MEM kicking them out and the more junior guys bump all those junior captains on the 777 and 767 and more and more. Realignment bids while we are shrinking the system will be hugely negative - a LOT of guys are going to get moved.

Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.

If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
Hmm, it’s kinda like we’re in the final stage of negotiations. Bring on the typical FUD (Fear, Unknown, Doubt).
Reply
Quote: Have you read the language in the contract since the 2015? It’s very likely that no 777 or 767 captain will get bumped. We gave up bumping rights when we gave up passover pay.
Yes I have and bumps are absolutely allowed. 2015 changes just made it so it can all happen in a single bid. There will be a MAX and MIN for each base. If displaced, your seniority still allows you to go to another base and if that makes that base number above the MAX then the bottom guy will get kicked out. Go back and read it again.
Reply
Quote: Tuck is full of indisputable facts.

Two, but he adds that it could be three bases closing (2-3) next System Bid.

2 for sure, but could be 3 bases closing, same thing
CGN, ANC 11 and possibly LAX 11.
Reply
Quote: Hmm, it’s kinda like we’re in the final stage of negotiations. Bring on the typical FUD (Fear, Unknown, Doubt).
We've been in the "end game" of negotiations since at least October - when we petitioned the NMB. We still have a ways to go to get a TA that this crew force will accept.
Reply
Quote: We've been in the "end game" of negotiations since at least October - when we petitioned the NMB. We still have a ways to go to get a TA that this crew force will accept.
Guess you'll find out when you're on Wall St. with your fellow pilots on April 5th now won't we?
Reply
Quote: There will be a significant realignment bid next month - 2-3 bases will close. That will cause a HUGE ripple effect throughout the system as senior guys move to MEM kicking them out and the more junior guys bump all those junior captains on the 777 and 767 and more and more. Realignment bids while we are shrinking the system will be hugely negative - a LOT of guys are going to get moved.

Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.

If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
I've heard those rumors as well. But how can there be that much shuffling but also send instructors to the line? Maybe on the 11 but the other fleets will see a large need in the training department.
Reply
Quote: I've heard those rumors as well. But how can there be that much shuffling but also send instructors to the line? Maybe on the 11 but the other fleets will see a large need in the training department.
We are still training out positions from the HKG closure from almost two years ago. But yea, sure, we are closing 2-3 bases. So the company wants to make drastic changes that will cause training events for the next three years or more? McKinsey definitely sees the fault in that logic.
Reply
Quote: We are still training out positions from the HKG closure from almost two years ago. But yea, sure, we are closing 2-3 bases. So the company wants to make drastic changes that will cause training events for the next three years or more? McKinsey definitely sees the fault in that logic.
Yea I keep hearing these rumors and the math just doesn't add up. I said that in one of these threads where someone said widebody captain would goto12+ years. The math doesn't work to have that and not furlough almost 1000.
Reply
Maybe there will be a bigger picture to this on April 5th. Fleet replacement etc. I’d assume 76 and 77 are the future.
Reply
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
Page 5 of 8
Go to