Quote:
The point I’m making is there’s zero competition, the customers base is filthy rich, and the only sacrifice to removing 20 seats is giving up more profits. There’s no questions about making money flying a 50 seat 175 to Aspen, zero.
As the guy mentioned who you responded to SkyWest doesn’t have an option when the RJ700’s are retired so a 50 seat 175 may be the ONLY option. They will absolutely make a shlt ton of $ flying 50 seat 175’s, just not as much as with the 700’s.
But to have enough 50 seat 175s in the fleet to be able to reliably serve ASE for all carriers… so that when one goes down for mx they aren’t canceling half the ASE flights for 3 days… can they also make money flying a 50 seat 175 on DEN ABQ or SLC PSC? Or my favorite… LAX SBAOriginally Posted by LAXtoDEN
The point I’m making is there’s zero competition, the customers base is filthy rich, and the only sacrifice to removing 20 seats is giving up more profits. There’s no questions about making money flying a 50 seat 175 to Aspen, zero.
As the guy mentioned who you responded to SkyWest doesn’t have an option when the RJ700’s are retired so a 50 seat 175 may be the ONLY option. They will absolutely make a shlt ton of $ flying 50 seat 175’s, just not as much as with the 700’s.