Quote:
In this environment it would be more beneficial to TA everything and throw it against the wall and see what sticks. Unity is only truly revealed when the agreement is shown to be unacceptable. I thought we learned this lesson. All the internal bickering stops when the true nature of managements intent is revealed. This is why they fight for secrecy surrounding negotiations. Bad morale is bad for business so it's been removed as a tool for the union. If we had leadership that was willing to do EVERYTHING legally within their power to exert pressure we would have a real unity. This period beyond the amendable date is akin to indentured servitude.
AT the risk of sounded smarmy, if we had it your way weve have to finsih contract negotiations in may of 2020. Sometimes the RLA helps us, this isnt the first time for pilots.Originally Posted by notEnuf
No, the process is the problem and has been for the industry forever. The unity is is not the issue. Management knows they benefit from the process and are not motivated to change it but incentivized to lengthen it. If any other supplier was an exclusive provider there would be resources and efforts made to get a deal done. Our process while being bound by the RLA doesn't have to be punitive. This needs to change. An amendment that only lasts four years in the face of regulatory structure that require it applies regardless of timeline is a boat anchor. The only way to fix this is to provide a means for wage growth for the duration of the contract's applicable period. Given that there's no situation that will ever allow a withdrawal of service upon the self imposed contractual limit on wage progression, there is no reason to limit wage growth for a specific 4 year period. The period beyond agreed upon wage tables needs to be addressed. The fact that contracts take years has nothing to do with the union but rather the incentive for management to not make a deal until motivated to do so. No other business contract takes this long to amend without an escalator clause or bridge provision to address real world costs during a lack of agreement.In this environment it would be more beneficial to TA everything and throw it against the wall and see what sticks. Unity is only truly revealed when the agreement is shown to be unacceptable. I thought we learned this lesson. All the internal bickering stops when the true nature of managements intent is revealed. This is why they fight for secrecy surrounding negotiations. Bad morale is bad for business so it's been removed as a tool for the union. If we had leadership that was willing to do EVERYTHING legally within their power to exert pressure we would have a real unity. This period beyond the amendable date is akin to indentured servitude.
You're having a long discussion about the way things should be, but arent. I had those discussions more than a decade ago when i was first learning about the RLA 3 or 4 years into my career. Im for moving us out of the rla, and all the risk that entails, but its not going to happen. Even if you really really want it and write four paragraphs about it. The same rules that got united, delta, great pay is the same system we have today. If every pilot acts unified, as ive seen work, the process can be "quick" and direct.
If every pilot informationally pickets that has a day off (even if it was close). If every pilot stops by the CPs office who is at work and says, "let the company know im sick of this crap. My mec knows what i want, get figured out how to pay for it " this is over. Management knows were still fairly divided on what we want.