US/DL Slot Swap Approved

Subscribe
3  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17 
Page 13 of 17
Go to
Any thoughts if the slot swap will require any new bodies on property?
Reply
Quote:
Personally I would not want to be a non-union group merging with SWA.
I don't know.... Having a union is not doing Air Tran pilots much good right now.
Reply
Quote: I don't know.... Having a union is not doing Air Tran pilots much good right now.
Some might argue that having a union isn't doing the Southwest pilots much good right now either. Now, having a supportive management is doing the Southwest pilots a whole lot of good.
Reply
Quote: Some might argue that having a union isn't doing the Southwest pilots much good right now either. Now, having a supportive management is doing the Southwest pilots a whole lot of good.
Exactly. Imagine if before the corporate transaction took place, AirTran had a management and Board of Directors that cared about their employees and said "no deal will take place without a fair integration of the SLI." And the model you will use is already written in federal law, Mac/Bond. Imagine if AirTran had fought for their group the way SWA has for their pilots. The point is management dictating the terms of an SLI, kinda negates the purpose of the union. Just a thought.
Reply
Quote: Some might argue that having a union isn't doing the Southwest pilots much good right now either. Now, having a supportive management is doing the Southwest pilots a whole lot of good.
nevermind.....
Reply
Quote: I don't know.... Having a union is not doing Air Tran pilots much good right now.
Personally, I think the verdict is still out on this one, even though I agree with you that it may not look very promising for Airtran guys.

I'm interested to see how this plays out from the standpoint of having two majors carriers integrating with an in-house union and big, powerful ALPA.

Depending on how it pans out, it may or may not be a major selling point for ALPA going into the future.
Reply
Quote: Personally, I think the verdict is still out on this one, even though I agree with you that it may not look very promising for Airtran guys.

I'm interested to see how this plays out from the standpoint of having two majors carriers integrating with an in-house union and big, powerful ALPA.

Depending on how it pans out, it may or may not be a major selling point for ALPA going into the future.
You cannot blame ALPA for what's going on over there. SWAPA is just a champagne drinking, cigar smoking, laughing all the way to the seniority stolen bank beneficiary of heavy handed management. Unless AT calls the bluff, (which isn't likely)and is prepared to take SWA to court over this, SWAPA wins.. but it is not because THEY are inherently more powerful than ALPA
Reply
Quote: You cannot blame ALPA for what's going on over there. SWAPA is just a champagne drinking, cigar smoking, laughing all the way to the seniority stolen bank beneficiary of heavy handed management. Unless AT calls the bluff, (which isn't likely)and is prepared to take SWA to court over this, SWAPA wins.. but it is not because THEY are inherently more powerful than ALPA
Sorry for the thread hi-jack, but the important point is, if this deal goes through the precedence has been set, management can dictate the terms of an SLI, effectively negating a CBA's merger policy. From a management perspective I think SWA is brilliant. They may have avoided a long SLI arbitration/litigation battle (AW/USAir) scenario. Great for SWA pilots, not so great for AirTran pilots. Most folks would wish to have SWA management negotiating on their behalf. The unions in this case have essentially been on the sidelines while SWA management runs the plays. Someone earlier said a CBA gives you a seat at the table, my point is AirTran ALPA wasn't even invited to dinner (unless I am missing something).

To get back on topic - SWA will most likely gain LGA slots from the US/DL slot swap for a greater presence in New York.
Reply
Quote: Interesting article: What I glean from this article is B6 has the lowest Ex-Fuel CASM in the industry, the highest revenue growth in the industry with a superior customer service product and now one of the strongest airline brands. Oh, and by the way the most productive pilot group in the industry, that is compensated quite well. Currently 5th among all passenger airlines: http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2...0PERSONNEL.htm All of this while remaining 100% Non-Union. The most modern and fuel efficient fleet in the industry. Sounds to me like they are doing everything right over at JetBlue. Sounds like the SWA of not too long ago.

Why would the Board of Directors want to merge or fragment with the huge upside potential of JetBlue. All of this done during the worst economic times of the Airline Industry, imagine these numbers under a robust economy. Only way I see a B6 tie-up, while I agree they are a very attractive target is through some type of hostile takeover with a huge premium on their stock price. Don't forget that Lufthansa owns a large stake in the company and would like to keep it that way and they are very well financed.
All your points are operational concerns. And while completely valid, the BOD cares not one bit about operations. How much money could be made from a merger - that is their point of view. Running a good airline? Irrelevant to the 1%.
Reply
My point is that JetBlue is a very successful company. It will most likely take two management partners for a dance. There are many here who are convinced JetBlue is "In-Play", my point is that in play will most likely be a hostile takeover, which is tougher than most think.
Reply
3  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17 
Page 13 of 17
Go to