Way to ignore all the overwhelming evidence in this thread and elsewhere that:

1) the data being touted by NOAA and NASA are grossly manipulated to "prove" what the fear-mongering leftists spew

2) that the Obama administration has politicized both NOAA and NASA to support it's political agenda in service to #1 above (in the same way it used the IRS in 2010-2012 before it was caught RED-HANDED)...all of which is FACT.

Go have another glass of manipulated, fear-mongering kool-aid.

Thanks.

No no it doesn't

Sorry, but man-made global climate change is as close to scientific certainty as is possible. This thread is convincing evidence that among true believers that no amount of evidence is sufficient. WADR I will go with scientists and experts over the likes of Breitbart and those on big oil's payroll.

The scientific evidence proves that it's not possible for the global warming to be man made.

Either way even it is was caused by humans (which it is not) there is not way we could alter the weather.

You can ban all the pickup trucks you want, or tax beef all you want (like sanders has said he will do) but none of that will work or cause any changes.

It's a swindle.

Of course, to disagree would result in a loss of funding.

What credentials do you possess to counter the overwhelming scientific data and scholarship? Oh ya, you're a pilot. LMAO.

New Video: Why Scientists Trust the Surface Thermometers More than Satellites | Climate Denial Crock of the Week

Yep, we should trust Exxon and their paid parrots. UFB. Do you still think smoking tobacco doesn't cause cancer?

LOL

Sure it is, when you use fudged statistics, manipulated data, and hockey sticks bent to show what you want it show in support of your socio-economic political agenda.

"consensus" = we don't want the gov't-funded studies gravy-train to stop, forcing us to get real jobs

And hey, nevermind "scientists" can't accurately predict with certainty what the Wx is going to be in 2 weeks, much less 2 decades or centuries from now.

Who is the more believable...a cautious skeptic pointing at the gaping holes in the theory or the true believer relying on the exact same "scientific consensus" that once held the earth was flat and the universe rotated around it?

We all know the answer to that.




Nice transparent deflection. Pity it does absolutely nothing to address FDXLAG's comment in any way, shape, or form.

That's because you have no counter-argument. You know it's true.


Science has PROVEN smoking can cause cancer.

Science has NOT proven "global warming".

What part of these very simple sentences don't you understand, child?

https://www.azpm.org/p/crawler-stori...est-on-record/

https://weather.com/news/climate/new...ry-global-2016

The Wall Street Journal, Climate Change Denial, and the Galileo Gambit

(yawn)

Sorry, activist, your links don't undo the hundreds in this 5 year old thread demonstrating the various aspects of the on-going fraud behind your socio-economic political agenda. You want to re-hash debates already held on the previous pages after your agenda has been thoroughly exposed and your "movement" is on life-support. Forget it.