Climate alarmists are just that, alarmist. Otherwise they would have answers to the following statements.

CO2 does not cause climate change. Increases in temperatures occur before increases in CO2.

Fifteen or so global warmings occurred before humans were on earth. These warmings were so large that it makes the current supposed human caused 0.8C warming insignificant, very insignificant. More so, during the so-cause human caused warming period, the earth cooled for several decades thus proving that CO2 is not causal.

Do I believe humans cause warming? Sure. Every light bulb, electronic device, motor, kitchen, ... the list goes on and on .... causes heat that wouldn't otherwise be there.

The problem? A warming of the earth isn't going to kill humans. In fact, a warming of the earth causes massive plant and animal diversity.

We're going to be just fine.

Actually, unlike you or I they are scientists and the overwhelming consensus among them is that you are completely wrong.

Climate Scientist Warns World Of Widespread Suffering If Further Climate Change Is Not Forestalled

Yeah, but some of those massive animals might eat humans! Who could sleep well by the light of a Cretaceous moon?

Consensus of what SOME scientists think what is happening is not fact.

Show me the scientific method applied to CO2 caused global warming which is repeatable and can be demonstrated. I'll wait.

There are scientists who also disagree with CO2 caused global warming. I know, they're a bunch of kooks right?

I have two advanced technical degrees, one of them in Physics. So that would make you the only one in this conversation not a scientist.

The End of Doom - Reason.com
Global Warming Hiatus Is Real - Hit & Run : Reason.com

No need to wait, you just need to honestly seek the truth,

Why Carbon Dioxide Is a Greenhouse Gas - Scientific American

Who? Please post their information.

Fascists will be fascists....



Others alarmists aren't nearly so subtle as to simply want to jail those they disagree with...

Both of these articles were written by Ronald Bailey.

Ronald Bailey attended the University of Virginia, where he earned a B.A. in philosophy and economics in 1976. He worked briefly as an economist for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. From 1987 to 1990 he contributed articles to Forbes. Since 1997 he has been a science correspondent for Reason magazine. The Greenpeace project, "exxonsecrets.org" identifies the Reason Foundation, the CEI (where Bailey is an adjunct fellow) and the Cato Institute (where he is an adjunct scholar) as receiving funding from the U.S. Petroleum industry. Bailey was the 1993 Warren T. Brookes Fellow in Environmental Journalism at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI).

Therefore?? I can read Wikipedia, too, and you left out his accolades. Pretty convenient.

Who do you think is funding the pro climate change crowd? Maybe government and pro government intervention type organizations that are-oh, I dont know.....looking to prove the need for more government involvement and funding??!
https://ricochet.com/archives/50-nas...lobal-warming/