Quote:
Isn't it time the NTSB became more proactive and reigned in Malay authorities? Can they take the reigns, legally speaking?
There was some really good background information on this subject in something I read the day after MH370 went missing. may have been on Wiki... It talked about smaller countries that have historically designated an investigation authority. It specifically mentioned that the Canadians took control of the Swiss/Halifax affair, yet after the downing of Korean 007, the Korean govt. chose to ask the FAA for help and designated NTSB in charge of the accident.Originally Posted by Claybird
I'm concerned about the FDR and CVR. They might never be found and recovered. Finding the plane, assuming it crashed at sea, is one thing. Finding out why it crashed is another, unless its debris 'tells' a clear story about how events unfolded. Isn't it time the NTSB became more proactive and reigned in Malay authorities? Can they take the reigns, legally speaking?
I do not intend to make this a political argument, because I don't care to win or loose one, but I've been telling my Brother-in-Law whom I'm vacationing with, that the administration is remiss in not putting greater pressure on Malaysia to act like Korea did. I'm not trying to tell anyone here that...
Blame my global domination, capitalist, bow to the almighty dollar views, but that aircraft had an American, along with American business interests onboard. More importantly, it was manufactured by a U.S. corporation and likely sold with similar "conditional vendor" constraints as so many of their other products. To protect both American jobs and the reputation of a major American employer and manufacturer, it is my opinion that our agencies should have (and maybe to an extent they tried to) persuade a turnover.