Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Malaysian 777 missing >

Malaysian 777 missing

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Malaysian 777 missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2014, 11:50 AM
  #451  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 204
Default

Originally Posted by Mazster View Post
Sorry but i don't get intimidated. The question was not idiotic and posed in a quite cogent manner. Flippant responses are not necessary. If the moderators don't want me here they can throw me off. Otherwise, I am not here to please you "blastoff" or anyone else of the High and Mighty members of this group.
Go back to your mother's basement, troll. Members here have participated in intercepts, been in charge of intercepts, performed accident investigations, flown the 777, been 777 sim instructors, etc, etc, etc. Welcome to the ready room. If you feel harassed and intimidated, stop posting idiotic questions. Take the hint. "Cogent"? We'll determine that.

Occam's Razor is a good place to start. Some of the press worms keep bringing up the "landed somewhere" idea. Really? 250-odd people onboard and every one with a cell phone. Ever 3rd World crap hole has a cell phone system. If it were hijacked and flown somewhere, they would have to had absolute control over the passengers to prevent a cell call from someone. On that basis alone, that can be ruled out.

Hypoxia is a possibility, but all the alarms and alerts would have had to be inhibited for that to have caused complete incapacitation.

Transponder and ACARS turned off (they seem to be certain about that) says it was deliberate by someone. Hijacking by terrorists? 250 passengers sitting by for that? Possible, but unlikely post 9/11. "Hijacking" or "suicide" by one of the crew after one goes to the back to hit the head? Still seems unlikely, but seems the most likely. Still, with the crew member stuck in the back with 250 passengers - how does the guy in the cockpit prevent the door from being breached over many hours?

How do you control or incapacitate the passengers? From the engine data transmission, it was flying for many hours past its last voice transmission. Amazing.
LightAttack is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 11:59 AM
  #452  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,064
Default

Originally Posted by LightAttack View Post
Go back to your mother's basement, troll. Members here have participated in intercepts, been in charge of intercepts, performed accident investigations, flown the 777, been 777 sim instructors, etc, etc, etc. Welcome to the ready room. If you feel harassed and intimidated, stop posting idiotic questions. Take the hint. "Cogent"? We'll determine that.

Occam's Razor is a good place to start. Some of the press worms keep bringing up the "landed somewhere" idea. Really? 250-odd people onboard and every one with a cell phone. Ever 3rd World crap hole has a cell phone system. If it were hijacked and flown somewhere, they would have to had absolute control over the passengers to prevent a cell call from someone. On that basis alone, that can be ruled out.

Hypoxia is a possibility, but all the alarms and alerts would have had to be inhibited for that to have caused complete incapacitation.

Transponder and ACARS turned off (they seem to be certain about that) says it was deliberate by someone. Hijacking by terrorists? 250 passengers sitting by for that? Possible, but unlikely post 9/11. "Hijacking" or "suicide" by one of the crew after one goes to the back to hit the head? Still seems unlikely, but seems the most likely. Still, with the crew member stuck in the back with 250 passengers - how does the guy in the cockpit prevent the door from being breached over many hours?

How do you control or incapacitate the passengers? From the engine data transmission, it was flying for many hours past its last voice transmission. Amazing.
The question I have is regarding the Immersat information that was recently released. They said they determined the last signal was received at 8am (7 hours after takeoff) but the location was still in the East Indian Ocean upwards to Central Asia (very unlikely) or SE Indian Ocean towards Western Australia. At 7 hours, you'd think it would have gained a lot more distance from Malaysia.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:02 PM
  #453  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
Flash forward to today, 45 pages later, with in-fighting amongst APC members, media "experts", etc, today, we have NO factual information of what happened, to include NO factual info that terrorism/criminal activity was involved.

None.
I'm only on page 12. Try this: click on User CP, on the left under Your Control Panel find Settings and Options. Click on Edit Options. Then go down to Thread Display Options and go to Number of Posts to show per Page. Edit that to 40 per page and you won't have to scroll through so many pages. Might save some time, maybe not.

A lot of people on here obviously don't know about this feature because they often mention the number of pages and invariably its way more than necessary because they are on the forum default which is only 10 posts per page.

Anyway, maybe this is useful, maybe not, but I prefer the maximum of 40 posts per page. Now back to our wildly entertaining rampant speculation of what happened to flight 370.
FXDX is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:11 PM
  #454  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

Originally Posted by cbreezy View Post
the question i have is regarding the immersat information that was recently released. They said they determined the last signal was received at 8am (7 hours after takeoff) but the location was still in the east indian ocean upwards to central asia (very unlikely) or se indian ocean towards western australia. At 7 hours, you'd think it would have gained a lot more distance from malaysia.
inmarsat ?
satpak77 is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:13 PM
  #455  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,064
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
inmarsat ?
Yeah, that's my fault. I really should have verified the spelling instead of using my memory of what I read. I really need to stop writing from my cell phone.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:29 PM
  #456  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

Would 7 hours if endurance correspond to the wing tanks running dry at 9,000 gallons each?
F4E Mx is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:30 PM
  #457  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Conclusion

Stated as conclusion

Opinion stated as a conclusion.

Stated as fact - therefore a conclusion.

Some people are careful about differentiating between 'educated guesses', opinions, and FACTS.




I only went back to posts from page 35....but I'd bet that there are a few more posts in the thread using the words 'facts' in them when referencing this current mystery when actually there are actually very few in this case. I think on this most would agree.
And as the latest intel is out there some of those educated guess are very close to the mark. Essentially all of your quotes are repeated verbatim from a news story. Should we quit quoting the news here?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:30 PM
  #458  
Gets Weekends Off
 
savall's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: French American
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX View Post
I'm only on page 12. Try this: click on User CP, on the left under Your Control Panel find Settings and Options. Click on Edit Options. Then go down to Thread Display Options and go to Number of Posts to show per Page. Edit that to 40 per page and you won't have to scroll through so many pages. Might save some time, maybe not.

A lot of people on here obviously don't know about this feature because they often mention the number of pages and invariably its way more than necessary because they are on the forum default which is only 10 posts per page.

Anyway, maybe this is useful, maybe not, but I prefer the maximum of 40 posts per page. Now back to our wildly entertaining rampant speculation of what happened to flight 370.
The most conclusive post yet !
savall is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:33 PM
  #459  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by Mazster View Post
OK...educate me USMCFLYER...why is it inconceivable to attempt a maneuver on an intercept that would force a reaction by a pilot in command of the 777...even at night?
But you are beating a dead horse.
It is ok if you don't want to believe the people who have done such intercepts.
By all means - continue to educate us
And exactly what maneuver, in your expert opinion of military aircraft intercepts, would FORCE a pilot in command of a 777 into some sort of reaction (other than an aerial game of chicken of course) and would be both practical and safe for the intercepting pilot?
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 12:33 PM
  #460  
Production Test Pilot
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: Production Test Pilot, Boeing
Posts: 97
Default

I'm concerned about the FDR and CVR. They might never be found and recovered. Finding the plane, assuming it crashed at sea, is one thing. Finding out why it crashed is another, unless its debris 'tells' a clear story about how events unfolded.

Isn't it time the NTSB became more proactive and reigned in Malay authorities? Can they take the reigns, legally speaking?

I do not wish to speculate. But I am leaning towards what happened not being a malicious act, but rather an array of events no other aircraft had encountered before in previous accidents.
Claybird is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roll Inverted and Pull
Major
8
03-04-2008 06:36 PM
boost
Cargo
1
02-01-2008 03:38 PM
Dog Breath
Hangar Talk
8
09-13-2007 08:48 AM
madfoxjay
Part 135
8
09-06-2007 08:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices