Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

SkyWest ?’s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2023, 01:22 PM
  #4981  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by Amg4me View Post
If flying is fun, why does everyone complain so much about the regional airlines? It doesn't sound fun if you read many of the posts on the regional forums.
First world problems.
pangolin is offline  
Old 02-15-2023, 04:34 PM
  #4982  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Regionals are always economically constrained by the fact that they are codeshare -,they don’t sell their own tickets. But for Skywest - and most regionals right now - they have more FOs than they can gainfully employ. Because they can’t keep enough CAs. Despite DEC bonuses and credit for longevity at other regionals. And increasingly, they can’t keep their own senior FOs long enough to become upgrade eligible. No amount of zero 121 time FOs coming in at the bottom will change that until the majors stop hiring.

Adding new FOs when you don’t have the CAs you need o optimally utilize the ones you have simply slows the progress toward the day your existing FOs will be upgrade eligible by diluting out the SIC hours available - which just encourages the experienced FOs to jump to ULCCs or ACMI.


https://www.ft.com/content/70f0805c-...9-aabb0ea36324
Yes, I am fully aware of this problem. But Skywest forced upgrades and how many folks left due to that? They had an opportunity to poll the pilots anonymously to find out why they didn't want to upgrade and offer them incentives that would make them feel good about upgrading. Isn't it cheaper to give certain incentives to your current pilots then have to pay bonuses and training for new DECs? What if you gave those pilots certain alternatives they could chose from, such as (1) remain in the base they are currently in (2) longevity match (3) additional paid training, etc., and you can chose one of those alternatives to make the transition better? It doesn't work in the regional model to have FO lifers, it reduces the pull needed to train new pilots. But with all the smart folks working there, they can't come up with a better model that significantly reduces the problem? It seems shortsighted because the way the market is now if management doesn't get more creative, they are going to struggle with this problem for a long time and it will negatively impact operations and financial outcomes for years.
Amg4me is offline  
Old 02-15-2023, 05:30 PM
  #4983  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,555
Default

Originally Posted by Amg4me View Post
Yes, I am fully aware of this problem. But Skywest forced upgrades and how many folks left due to that?
If the FOs woukdn’t upgrade they were part of the problem. They were sucking up the limited SIC hours available to keep others who WERE willing to upgrade from accumulating the 1000 hours of SIC necessary to upgrade.

They had an opportunity to poll the pilots anonymously to find out why they didn't want to upgrade and offer them incentives that would make them feel good about upgrading. Isn't it cheaper to give certain incentives to your current pilots then have to pay bonuses and training for new DECs?
Apparently not, since managements generally ALWAYS go for the cheapest alternative.

What if you gave those pilots certain alternatives they could chose from, such as (1) remain in the base they are currently in (2) longevity match (3) additional paid training, etc., and you can chose one of those alternatives to make the transition better?
1. So you want them to violate other CA pilots seniority to keep you at a base? Or just stack CAs at a base where they aren’t needed?
2. Longevity match with what? How many different regionals have your senior FOs been employed at?
3.I am reasonably sure that you actually get paid during upgrade training. And the pay raise from making CA is non-trivial.


It doesn't work in the regional model to have FO lifers, it reduces the pull needed to train new pilots.
It would be acceptable if they were balanced by lifer CAs, but the vast majority of CAs prefer to move on to someplace that pays better and has more benefits.

But with all the smart folks working there, they can't come up with a better model that significantly reduces the problem?
Doesn’t matter how smart they are, they cannot change the CA requirements mandated under § 121.436, and slavery and indentured servitude were outlawed by the 13th amendment. Most CAs are GOING TO leave for a major eventually, barring exceptional personal circumstances or so close to mandatory requirement it doesn’t matter.


​​​​​​​It seems shortsighted because the way the market is now if management doesn't get more creative, they are going to struggle with this problem for a long time and it will negatively impact operations and financial outcomes for years.
If they DON’T mandate updates they will be out of business before that. They can replace FOs with 2000 hrs of 121 time with brand new guys right off IOE. If the high time FOs aren’t going to upgrade, there is little reason to keep them. That’s attrition they NEED to have.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 02-15-2023, 05:42 PM
  #4984  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,174
Default

Originally Posted by Amg4me View Post
Yes, I am fully aware of this problem. But Skywest forced upgrades and how many folks left due to that? They had an opportunity to poll the pilots anonymously to find out why they didn't want to upgrade and offer them incentives that would make them feel good about upgrading. Isn't it cheaper to give certain incentives to your current pilots then have to pay bonuses and training for new DECs? What if you gave those pilots certain alternatives they could chose from, such as (1) remain in the base they are currently in (2) longevity match (3) additional paid training, etc., and you can chose one of those alternatives to make the transition better? It doesn't work in the regional model to have FO lifers, it reduces the pull needed to train new pilots. But with all the smart folks working there, they can't come up with a better model that significantly reduces the problem? It seems shortsighted because the way the market is now if management doesn't get more creative, they are going to struggle with this problem for a long time and it will negatively impact operations and financial outcomes for years.
??
Do you work here?
The forced upgrades were mostly done so they could stay in their current domicile. Not all, but most. Longevity match? You do know you transfer over to the captain scale with however many years you have with the company and not start over at year 1. 10 year FO goes to 10 year CA pay. If you need extra training, you are always paid for it. Nothing here is done without pay. There are some limits on how much extra training you can receive, but they also just added extra stuff into the syllabus.

The pilots I know that weren't upgrading, did not need the money and usually had other stuff going on in their life.
Utah is offline  
Old 02-15-2023, 05:48 PM
  #4985  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,174
Default

We also now have fewer Captains than we did when the forced upgrades started last October.
Utah is offline  
Old 02-15-2023, 06:03 PM
  #4986  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,863
Default

Originally Posted by Utah View Post
We also now have fewer Captains than we did when the forced upgrades started last October.
Yup, and the imbalance is the same as it was before the forced upgrades began. So what has this disaster of a policy achieved? Let's see... Ah yes. Precisely nothing, aside from encourage more people to update their apps.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 02-15-2023, 06:51 PM
  #4987  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
Yup, and the imbalance is the same as it was before the forced upgrades began. So what has this disaster of a policy achieved? Let's see... Ah yes. Precisely nothing, aside from encourage more people to update their apps.
Quit, go on show them.
Round Luggage is offline  
Old 02-15-2023, 07:35 PM
  #4988  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,231
Default

Originally Posted by Utah View Post
We also now have fewer Captains than we did when the forced upgrades started last October.
Flew with a guy who was heading off to upgrade this month, 14 in his class, whelp…that’s not going to fix it.
trip is offline  
Old 02-15-2023, 08:02 PM
  #4989  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,555
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
Yup, and the imbalance is the same as it was before the forced upgrades began. So what has this disaster of a policy achieved? Let's see... Ah yes. Precisely nothing, aside from encourage more people to update their apps.
And under present conditions, if senior FOs aren’t going to upgrade, the company is better off encouraging those high time FOs to leave. They have lots of applicants waiting who will be happy to have those SIC hours, even on first or second year pay.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 02-16-2023, 06:43 AM
  #4990  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,863
Default

Originally Posted by Round Luggage View Post
Quit, go on show them.
Ummm...okay?
Turbosina is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
amcnd
SkyWest
42
02-17-2019 01:52 PM
iahflyr
Delta
10
09-07-2017 04:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices