Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

SkyWest ?’s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2023 | 06:03 PM
  #4951  
Turbosina's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 270
From: Guppy Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Utah
We also now have fewer Captains than we did when the forced upgrades started last October.
Yup, and the imbalance is the same as it was before the forced upgrades began. So what has this disaster of a policy achieved? Let's see... Ah yes. Precisely nothing, aside from encourage more people to update their apps.
Reply
Old 02-15-2023 | 06:51 PM
  #4952  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Yup, and the imbalance is the same as it was before the forced upgrades began. So what has this disaster of a policy achieved? Let's see... Ah yes. Precisely nothing, aside from encourage more people to update their apps.
Quit, go on show them.
Reply
Old 02-15-2023 | 07:35 PM
  #4953  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Utah
We also now have fewer Captains than we did when the forced upgrades started last October.
Flew with a guy who was heading off to upgrade this month, 14 in his class, whelp…that’s not going to fix it.
Reply
Old 02-15-2023 | 08:02 PM
  #4954  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,081
Likes: 182
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Yup, and the imbalance is the same as it was before the forced upgrades began. So what has this disaster of a policy achieved? Let's see... Ah yes. Precisely nothing, aside from encourage more people to update their apps.
And under present conditions, if senior FOs aren’t going to upgrade, the company is better off encouraging those high time FOs to leave. They have lots of applicants waiting who will be happy to have those SIC hours, even on first or second year pay.
Reply
Old 02-16-2023 | 06:43 AM
  #4955  
Turbosina's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 270
From: Guppy Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Round Luggage
Quit, go on show them.
Ummm...okay?
Reply
Old 02-16-2023 | 07:31 AM
  #4956  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
If the FOs woukdn’t upgrade they were part of the problem. They were sucking up the limited SIC hours available to keep others who WERE willing to upgrade from accumulating the 1000 hours of SIC necessary to upgrade.



Apparently not, since managements generally ALWAYS go for the cheapest alternative.



1. So you want them to violate other CA pilots seniority to keep you at a base? Or just stack CAs at a base where they aren’t needed?
2. Longevity match with what? How many different regionals have your senior FOs been employed at?
3.I am reasonably sure that you actually get paid during upgrade training. And the pay raise from making CA is non-trivial.




It would be acceptable if they were balanced by lifer CAs, but the vast majority of CAs prefer to move on to someplace that pays better and has more benefits.


Doesn’t matter how smart they are, they cannot change the CA requirements mandated under § 121.436, and slavery and indentured servitude were outlawed by the 13th amendment. Most CAs are GOING TO leave for a major eventually, barring exceptional personal circumstances or so close to mandatory requirement it doesn’t matter.




If they DON’T mandate updates they will be out of business before that. They can replace FOs with 2000 hrs of 121 time with brand new guys right off IOE. If the high time FOs aren’t going to upgrade, there is little reason to keep them. That’s attrition they NEED to have.
My point is instead of mandating something many FOs don't seem to want is to figure out why they don't want it and offer incentives to make them want it. Given there is a substantial pay increase, the money does not seem to be cure. But you first have to figure out what the issues with upgrading are and then how to correct that. It will not be the same for everyone and that is why you may have to offer different alternatives. The point on training is I know the training is paid. But it seems there are some folks that are concerned about the training fearing reported failure. If that is the truly the case for many, those expressing this as a reason for not upgrading could opt to receive additional training to increase their confidence for success. It is a complex problem which requires a complex solution, but for those that are longtime FOs (i.e., for some reason don't like change), if you can successfully get them to upgrade, do they become longtime CAs? Which helps alleviate the problem in the long run.
Reply
Old 02-16-2023 | 08:10 AM
  #4957  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Amg4me
My point is instead of mandating something many FOs don't seem to want is to figure out why they don't want it and offer incentives to make them want it. Given there is a substantial pay increase, the money does not seem to be cure. But you first have to figure out what the issues with upgrading are and then how to correct that. It will not be the same for everyone and that is why you may have to offer different alternatives. The point on training is I know the training is paid. But it seems there are some folks that are concerned about the training fearing reported failure. If that is the truly the case for many, those expressing this as a reason for not upgrading could opt to receive additional training to increase their confidence for success. It is a complex problem which requires a complex solution, but for those that are longtime FOs (i.e., for some reason don't like change), if you can successfully get them to upgrade, do they become longtime CAs? Which helps alleviate the problem in the long run.
Or... they can start their own 135 operation, replace some 121 flying with 135 flying, and get FOs the hours required to upgrade without needing to retain captains. There will always be a supply of age 65+ pilots who won't mind continuing to ***** themselves out for cash, and there will always be a supply of FOs at the 135 operation ready to bail to the 121 operation.

It sucks for the FOs currently on property or in the pipeline at the 121 operation, but it's a problem that SGU is currently solving outside OO.
Reply
Old 02-16-2023 | 10:53 AM
  #4958  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
If the FOs woukdn’t upgrade they were part of the problem. They were sucking up the limited SIC hours available to keep others who WERE willing to upgrade from accumulating the 1000 hours of SIC necessary to upgrade.



Apparently not, since managements generally ALWAYS go for the cheapest alternative.



1. So you want them to violate other CA pilots seniority to keep you at a base? Or just stack CAs at a base where they aren’t needed?
2. Longevity match with what? How many different regionals have your senior FOs been employed at?
3.I am reasonably sure that you actually get paid during upgrade training. And the pay raise from making CA is non-trivial.




It would be acceptable if they were balanced by lifer CAs, but the vast majority of CAs prefer to move on to someplace that pays better and has more benefits.


Doesn’t matter how smart they are, they cannot change the CA requirements mandated under § 121.436, and slavery and indentured servitude were outlawed by the 13th amendment. Most CAs are GOING TO leave for a major eventually, barring exceptional personal circumstances or so close to mandatory requirement it doesn’t matter.




If they DON’T mandate updates they will be out of business before that. They can replace FOs with 2000 hrs of 121 time with brand new guys right off IOE. If the high time FOs aren’t going to upgrade, there is little reason to keep them. That’s attrition they NEED to have.
Exactly. There’s no shortage of FOs. If a forced upgrade quits its no loss.
Reply
Old 02-16-2023 | 12:04 PM
  #4959  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,081
Likes: 182
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Exactly. There’s no shortage of FOs. If a forced upgrade quits its no loss.
In fact, if a forced upgrade quits, it’s a net gain for the company because his/her SIC hours (and all the costs that go with generating them) can now go to someone who:
a. Is cheaper
b. May eventually be willing to stay and become a CA since their seniority path is no longer clogged with dead wood.
c. And right now is waiting for an intro class that is getting slid farther and farther into the future because of that dead wood.


I think most high time FOs looking for sympathy because they are being forced ‘up or out’ as they say in the military are going to find that they are pumping at a dry well…
Reply
Old 02-17-2023 | 05:16 AM
  #4960  
Reserve Without End
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 243
Likes: 17
Default

I left to a Sunnier destination over forced upgrades. I didn’t want to commute to reserve when my wife and I want to have kids in the next year or two. I was looking forward to upgrade at Skywest, but they forced my hand on it.

Does it help my base was shrinking and that Delta wants to kill the CRJ in a similar way that I want to kill the spider in my basement? No. There were external factors outside of the control at Skywest at play.

But I do know now that Skywest is seeing attrition of very junior FOs too because they aren’t flying. I spoke with a man a week ago who was in for an interview and he’d flown 2 hours in the last month on reserve. Shocker. People want to fly.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
amcnd
SkyWest
41
02-17-2019 01:52 PM
iahflyr
Delta
10
09-07-2017 04:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices