Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

SkyWest ?’s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2023 | 07:31 AM
  #4991  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
If the FOs woukdn’t upgrade they were part of the problem. They were sucking up the limited SIC hours available to keep others who WERE willing to upgrade from accumulating the 1000 hours of SIC necessary to upgrade.



Apparently not, since managements generally ALWAYS go for the cheapest alternative.



1. So you want them to violate other CA pilots seniority to keep you at a base? Or just stack CAs at a base where they aren’t needed?
2. Longevity match with what? How many different regionals have your senior FOs been employed at?
3.I am reasonably sure that you actually get paid during upgrade training. And the pay raise from making CA is non-trivial.




It would be acceptable if they were balanced by lifer CAs, but the vast majority of CAs prefer to move on to someplace that pays better and has more benefits.


Doesn’t matter how smart they are, they cannot change the CA requirements mandated under § 121.436, and slavery and indentured servitude were outlawed by the 13th amendment. Most CAs are GOING TO leave for a major eventually, barring exceptional personal circumstances or so close to mandatory requirement it doesn’t matter.




If they DON’T mandate updates they will be out of business before that. They can replace FOs with 2000 hrs of 121 time with brand new guys right off IOE. If the high time FOs aren’t going to upgrade, there is little reason to keep them. That’s attrition they NEED to have.
My point is instead of mandating something many FOs don't seem to want is to figure out why they don't want it and offer incentives to make them want it. Given there is a substantial pay increase, the money does not seem to be cure. But you first have to figure out what the issues with upgrading are and then how to correct that. It will not be the same for everyone and that is why you may have to offer different alternatives. The point on training is I know the training is paid. But it seems there are some folks that are concerned about the training fearing reported failure. If that is the truly the case for many, those expressing this as a reason for not upgrading could opt to receive additional training to increase their confidence for success. It is a complex problem which requires a complex solution, but for those that are longtime FOs (i.e., for some reason don't like change), if you can successfully get them to upgrade, do they become longtime CAs? Which helps alleviate the problem in the long run.
Reply
Old 02-16-2023 | 08:10 AM
  #4992  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Amg4me
My point is instead of mandating something many FOs don't seem to want is to figure out why they don't want it and offer incentives to make them want it. Given there is a substantial pay increase, the money does not seem to be cure. But you first have to figure out what the issues with upgrading are and then how to correct that. It will not be the same for everyone and that is why you may have to offer different alternatives. The point on training is I know the training is paid. But it seems there are some folks that are concerned about the training fearing reported failure. If that is the truly the case for many, those expressing this as a reason for not upgrading could opt to receive additional training to increase their confidence for success. It is a complex problem which requires a complex solution, but for those that are longtime FOs (i.e., for some reason don't like change), if you can successfully get them to upgrade, do they become longtime CAs? Which helps alleviate the problem in the long run.
Or... they can start their own 135 operation, replace some 121 flying with 135 flying, and get FOs the hours required to upgrade without needing to retain captains. There will always be a supply of age 65+ pilots who won't mind continuing to ***** themselves out for cash, and there will always be a supply of FOs at the 135 operation ready to bail to the 121 operation.

It sucks for the FOs currently on property or in the pipeline at the 121 operation, but it's a problem that SGU is currently solving outside OO.
Reply
Old 02-16-2023 | 10:53 AM
  #4993  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
If the FOs woukdn’t upgrade they were part of the problem. They were sucking up the limited SIC hours available to keep others who WERE willing to upgrade from accumulating the 1000 hours of SIC necessary to upgrade.



Apparently not, since managements generally ALWAYS go for the cheapest alternative.



1. So you want them to violate other CA pilots seniority to keep you at a base? Or just stack CAs at a base where they aren’t needed?
2. Longevity match with what? How many different regionals have your senior FOs been employed at?
3.I am reasonably sure that you actually get paid during upgrade training. And the pay raise from making CA is non-trivial.




It would be acceptable if they were balanced by lifer CAs, but the vast majority of CAs prefer to move on to someplace that pays better and has more benefits.


Doesn’t matter how smart they are, they cannot change the CA requirements mandated under § 121.436, and slavery and indentured servitude were outlawed by the 13th amendment. Most CAs are GOING TO leave for a major eventually, barring exceptional personal circumstances or so close to mandatory requirement it doesn’t matter.




If they DON’T mandate updates they will be out of business before that. They can replace FOs with 2000 hrs of 121 time with brand new guys right off IOE. If the high time FOs aren’t going to upgrade, there is little reason to keep them. That’s attrition they NEED to have.
Exactly. There’s no shortage of FOs. If a forced upgrade quits its no loss.
Reply
Old 02-16-2023 | 12:04 PM
  #4994  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,261
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Exactly. There’s no shortage of FOs. If a forced upgrade quits its no loss.
In fact, if a forced upgrade quits, it’s a net gain for the company because his/her SIC hours (and all the costs that go with generating them) can now go to someone who:
a. Is cheaper
b. May eventually be willing to stay and become a CA since their seniority path is no longer clogged with dead wood.
c. And right now is waiting for an intro class that is getting slid farther and farther into the future because of that dead wood.


I think most high time FOs looking for sympathy because they are being forced ‘up or out’ as they say in the military are going to find that they are pumping at a dry well…
Reply
Old 02-17-2023 | 05:16 AM
  #4995  
On a QS
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 243
Likes: 17
Default

I left to a Sunnier destination over forced upgrades. I didn’t want to commute to reserve when my wife and I want to have kids in the next year or two. I was looking forward to upgrade at Skywest, but they forced my hand on it.

Does it help my base was shrinking and that Delta wants to kill the CRJ in a similar way that I want to kill the spider in my basement? No. There were external factors outside of the control at Skywest at play.

But I do know now that Skywest is seeing attrition of very junior FOs too because they aren’t flying. I spoke with a man a week ago who was in for an interview and he’d flown 2 hours in the last month on reserve. Shocker. People want to fly.
Reply
Old 02-17-2023 | 06:20 AM
  #4996  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,261
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by AlikesitR
I left to a Sunnier destination over forced upgrades. I didn’t want to commute to reserve when my wife and I want to have kids in the next year or two. I was looking forward to upgrade at Skywest, but they forced my hand on it.

Does it help my base was shrinking and that Delta wants to kill the CRJ in a similar way that I want to kill the spider in my basement? No. There were external factors outside of the control at Skywest at play.

But I do know now that Skywest is seeing attrition of very junior FOs too because they aren’t flying. I spoke with a man a week ago who was in for an interview and he’d flown 2 hours in the last month on reserve. Shocker. People want to fly.
Absolutely. And without CAs, they can’t fly, and with the seniority list clogged with upgrade eligible FOs who either won’t or can’t upgrade, the situation could only get worse. Forcing those senior FOs to either upgrade or go off to “sunnier destinations” was necessary to break up that seniority imposed logjam.

As far as the CRJ, everyone hates the 200, not just Delta, and it is not cost effective in an era of pilot shortages. The CRJ/700/900 Number less than 500 in US service and no one is making them anymore. Riding them off into the sunset - unless you are already 60 - probably isn’t going to happen.
Reply
Old 02-17-2023 | 06:42 AM
  #4997  
On a QS
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 243
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Absolutely. And without CAs, they can’t fly, and with the seniority list clogged with upgrade eligible FOs who either won’t or can’t upgrade, the situation could only get worse. Forcing those senior FOs to either upgrade or go off to “sunnier destinations” was necessary to break up that seniority imposed logjam.

As far as the CRJ, everyone hates the 200, not just Delta, and it is not cost effective in an era of pilot shortages. The CRJ/700/900 Number less than 500 in US service and no one is making them anymore. Riding them off into the sunset - unless you are already 60 - probably isn’t going to happen.
Funny enough, I only had 500 121 when I left. But I was also in a base where when I started had 106 lines and was down to 40… The writing was on the wall.

Delta appears to hate the CRJ (regardless of variant) more than the other partners. The CRJ flying out of Chicago is actually pretty cool. And the West Coast isn’t bad either. But the Delta dedicated CRJ flying is in steep decline. It won’t be long until they’re stuffing 175s into the UP 😜
Reply
Old 02-18-2023 | 06:17 AM
  #4998  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: A320 First Officer
Default Need Advice

Scheduled for 4/21 ATP/CTP and 5/1 indoc. I’m not flying as much as I should be and hours are coming more slowly than planned, so I need a later class. However, we are having all these delays with classes. Should I just wait it out and see if they will push mine back? Or should I go ahead and ask for a later date and hope that the new one doesn’t get affected?
Reply
Old 02-18-2023 | 07:14 AM
  #4999  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: RJ Captain
Default

Originally Posted by ryapache7
Scheduled for 4/21 ATP/CTP and 5/1 indoc. I’m not flying as much as I should be and hours are coming more slowly than planned, so I need a later class. However, we are having all these delays with classes. Should I just wait it out and see if they will push mine back? Or should I go ahead and ask for a later date and hope that the new one doesn’t get affected?
I wouldn't change anything until the last minute.
Reply
Old 02-18-2023 | 10:04 PM
  #5000  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 584
Likes: 72
Default

Originally Posted by Utah
I wouldn't change anything until the last minute.
Super solid advice.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
amcnd
SkyWest
42
02-17-2019 01:52 PM
iahflyr
Delta
10
09-07-2017 04:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices