Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   SkyWest (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/)
-   -   Skywest v2.0 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/93589-skywest-v2-0-a.html)

Is offline 12-12-2016 04:29 PM


Originally Posted by hawk21 (Post 2261289)
I'm curious what's going to happen to GJ if the UAL 700s are leaving SKW. Are they also losing them?

United wants no 700's. That includes GJ and the Mesa 700's.

amcnd 12-12-2016 04:48 PM


Originally Posted by Is offline (Post 2261414)
United wants no 700's. That includes GJ and the Mesa 700's.

So no Aspen??

hawk21 12-12-2016 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2261418)
So no Aspen??

I think that's the one exception.

Is offline 12-12-2016 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2261418)
So no Aspen??

I thought we had discussed the only reason the 14 700's staying was to do the mountain flying since the others can't seem to get approval

N1234 12-12-2016 08:12 PM


Originally Posted by Is offline (Post 2261478)
I thought we had discussed the only reason the 14 700's staying was to do the mountain flying since the others can't seem to get approval

We are keeping them because the contract isn't up yet. I think the expire in 2018 or so.

And it happens to cover some - but not all mountain flying ....

So this is more coincidence than a well thought-out plan.

Turbosina 12-12-2016 08:15 PM

Was in the schoolhouse this past weekend and the story we heard about the -700s was not that United didn't want 'em. Apparently (according to what we were told, so take this with a giant salt shaker) — United wanted to renew the -700 flying, but SKW has been consistently losing money on that flying. So SKW came back with a number and United balked. We then switched those planes to AA, and the word is that United has changed its tune and now wants those airplanes back (but most have already been painted.)

Again — schoolhouse rumors from the sim instructors. Not to be taken as the gospel truth.

tizzizzailslf04 12-12-2016 08:26 PM


Originally Posted by Turbosina (Post 2261530)
Was in the schoolhouse this past weekend and the story we heard about the -700s was not that United didn't want 'em. Apparently (according to what we were told, so take this with a giant salt shaker) — United wanted to renew the -700 flying, but SKW has been consistently losing money on that flying. So SKW came back with a number and United balked. We then switched those planes to AA, and the word is that United has changed its tune and now wants those airplanes back (but most have already been painted.)

Again — schoolhouse rumors from the sim instructors. Not to be taken as the gospel truth.

Heard basically this exact same thing in the schoolhouse from a sim instructor last week

WesternSkies 12-12-2016 08:35 PM

I'd heard a long time ago that our united 700 flying wasn't very profitable and I can buy United didn't want to pay more, but school house rumor doubt creeps in talking about remorse on Uniteds part.

Turbosina 12-12-2016 09:16 PM


Originally Posted by WesternSkies (Post 2261538)
I'd heard a long time ago that our united 700 flying wasn't very profitable and I can buy United didn't want to pay more, but school house rumor doubt creeps in talking about remorse on Uniteds part.

The one thing I did hear recently, which I do believe, is that not long after UAL took away SKW ground handling in SFO and replaced it with mainline ground staff specifically hired for the purpose, the resulting cluster******* caused UAL to come back and ask SKW to re-hire everyone we'd terminated and take back the below-the-wing handling. Apparently SKW refused, for some unknown reason.

It's really a shame, as the SFO ground handling was by far the best of any hub airport we operate into. The SKW guys worked really hard. The new UAL operation is a complete joke (although it is getting marginally better and at least isn't such a catastrophe as IAH, DEN, or ORD.)

MajHam 12-12-2016 09:53 PM


Originally Posted by saxman66 (Post 2260697)
You can't just call and ask for any trip though. It's spelled out in the PPM. Inverse seniority order unless you bid call first according to the bucket system. I do wish we could get proffering though. That would be a huge QOL improvement for reserves.

Thanks everyone! Sorry for the delay.
So the inverse seniority thing (only on reserve I'm guessing?) means the most junior numbers get called 1st? I'm confused. And the bucket system, what is this? If anyone wants to elaborate I'm all ears and very grateful.

(either way it sounds like there's basically no flying while on reserve for all those months, just waiting near the reserve base... picking up a handful of hours... right?)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands