Airline Pilot Central Forums
Page 781 of 1111
« First
281
681
731
771
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
791
831
881
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   SkyWest (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/)
-   -   Skywest v2.0 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/93589-skywest-v2-0-a.html)

Flyinlynn 06-21-2017 10:38 PM
Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 2382910)
I'm going to one up and say if you are a flight instructor thinking of Skywest you better be in the cadet program. You'd be a fool if you aren't.
Well I maybe a fool but I am in the cadet program :)

hawk21 06-23-2017 08:40 AM
Originally Posted by CaptSwift (Post 2382561)

So, If your new to this forum, considering going to skywest and don't have any inside references, feel free to PM me and I'll be happy to help, also.

Can't hate the hustle.

Rocksteady 06-23-2017 09:10 AM
Anyone heard anything about what OO's plans are regarding the CRJ 200 and making them ADSB compliant by 2020? I feel like there is no way from a cost/benefit perspective that it would make sense. Also, I assume the ERJ's are already fully compliant, is that correct?

elmetal 06-23-2017 09:12 AM
We have an FOIB regarding. All of them are getting 2 fms' and an adsb light. Some are out there already

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

Rocksteady 06-23-2017 09:27 AM
Originally Posted by elmetal (Post 2383899)
We have an FOIB regarding. All of them are getting 2 fms' and an adsb light. Some are out there already

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Thank you! I will check that out

rickair7777 06-23-2017 04:33 PM
Originally Posted by Rocksteady (Post 2383898)
Anyone heard anything about what OO's plans are regarding the CRJ 200 and making them ADSB compliant by 2020? I feel like there is no way from a cost/benefit perspective that it would make sense. Also, I assume the ERJ's are already fully compliant, is that correct?
Yes, they're getting them. The cost may be a bit high in relation to value of the airframe itself, but it's nothing compared to the revenue SKW can continue to generate by flying them for years to come.

amcnd 06-23-2017 04:52 PM
The 200's are cheap. And were "power by hour" with GE. Were there largest engine user, that equals cheap... i think will continue to pick up used ones to cover the ones timing out.. so pretty much a flat CRJ200 fleet over the next 10 years..

MidnightHauler 06-24-2017 03:45 PM
Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 2384217)
The 200's are cheap. And were "power by hour" with GE. Were there largest engine user, that equals cheap... i think will continue to pick up used ones to cover the ones timing out.. so pretty much a flat CRJ200 fleet over the next 10 years..
When they retire the E-175s to the "boneyard", they'll fly the crews home on the CRJ-200s. Haha!

elmetal 06-24-2017 03:48 PM
We said that same thing about flying home crj crews taking 200s to the desert in a Brasilia... That didn't happen sadly :(

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

PilotBrandon07 06-25-2017 11:40 AM
Originally Posted by Rocksteady (Post 2383898)
Anyone heard anything about what OO's plans are regarding the CRJ 200 and making them ADSB compliant by 2020? I feel like there is no way from a cost/benefit perspective that it would make sense. Also, I assume the ERJ's are already fully compliant, is that correct?
The 200 is the most profitable airplane for OO right now. They will update them. From what I understand they've already started on the 700s.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 AM.
Page 781 of 1111
« First
281
681
731
771
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
791
831
881
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands