Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Will the MRJ fly at Skywest and TSA? >

Will the MRJ fly at Skywest and TSA?

Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Will the MRJ fly at Skywest and TSA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2016, 05:22 PM
  #31  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by Bobman80 View Post

Just an afterthought but it seems fairly obvious you have no desire to move on to a mainline legacy carrier. Is that correct? It's not an insult, just a question. Allowing SkyWest MRJs helps no one except SkyWest and people planning making a career at SkyWest.
No in all honesty I just don't understand that weight limit. If you're concerned with "jobs", it doesn't make a difference in the MRJs case as it's the equivalent of a CRJ9 or 175 in seats and pretty much weight but slightly over.
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 05:26 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,373
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4 View Post
Fair enough but I don't know any 90k pound 737 or Airbus.
The original DC-9 was right around 86K lbs, for what it's worth. Damn fine airplane at that weight too
KSCessnaDriver is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 05:31 PM
  #33  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver View Post
The original DC-9 was right around 86K lbs, for what it's worth. Damn fine airplane at that weight too
Haha that's how they came up with that number then! The DC9.
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 05:50 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: DL
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4 View Post
No in all honesty I just don't understand that weight limit. If you're concerned with "jobs", it doesn't make a difference in the MRJs case as it's the equivalent of a CRJ9 or 175 in seats and pretty much weight but slightly over.
I don't think we are going to agree on this. Good luck.
Bobman80 is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 07:17 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,373
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4 View Post
Haha that's how they came up with that number then! The DC9.
It's a better RJ than the CRJ ever can be, for what it's worth...
KSCessnaDriver is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 08:24 PM
  #36  
spin 2
 
stillcantfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: the big one
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4 View Post
might as well bring the CRJ9 and 175s on board at mainline at that point.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^Brightest thing I've seen anyone say on here!
stillcantfly is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 08:33 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 382
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4 View Post
No in all honesty I just don't understand that weight limit. If you're concerned with "jobs", it doesn't make a difference in the MRJs case as it's the equivalent of a CRJ9 or 175 in seats and pretty much weight but slightly over.
If you want to argue that the MTOW limit makes no sense wouldn't it follow that you think the 76 seat scope limit is arbitrary too? Why not put CRJ 1000s and E195s at regionals?
BrewCity is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 08:38 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,852
Default

Originally Posted by stillcantfly View Post
^^^^^^^^^^^^^Brightest thing I've seen anyone say on here!
Well for that to happen, mainline pilots would have to change their minds and elect to fly those aircraft. And mainline management would have to be willing to pay mainline wages to fly those aircraft. Neither of these two conditions has been true for a very long time.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 09-01-2016, 08:38 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

Did Alaska get scope? Hopefully. Probably needed that yesterday if they didn't.
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 03:18 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
Well for that to happen, mainline pilots would have to change their minds and elect to fly those aircraft. And mainline management would have to be willing to pay mainline wages to fly those aircraft. Neither of these two conditions has been true for a very long time.
That is a tired and RJ pilot myth on why they exist in the industry. Mainline has pay rates and work rules for the RJ. All management needs to do is put them in service at mainline. The big downside is all the RJ pilots that were locked in a bitter life timers that perpetuated the myth that mainline pilots put them in A corner get shown the door.

I highly suspect you were not in the industry when mainline forced RJ on the pilot groups. If you don't really know the history it would behoove you to learn so you don't sound so misinformed.
Lambourne is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lovellrt
SkyWest
15181
02-25-2016 05:47 PM
Gundam
Career Questions
8
09-03-2014 10:00 PM
LivinTheDream28
Regional
92
02-25-2010 03:21 AM
328dude
GoJet
628
03-24-2009 09:33 AM
Koolaidman
Regional
20
12-27-2006 04:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices