Will the MRJ fly at Skywest and TSA?
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,483
Nope. You're just a tool bag who thinks he knows everything. It's pretty common knowledge that our COO has said the MRJ would never fly here. But what do I know, I just fly airplanes, oh, and parade.
#62
What's to stop Mitsubishi from doing this as well, in order to sell more planes to the US regional market? Also, if they don't do this, and if scope doesn't change for any of the US mainline, what are OO and TSA going to do with their planes on order? Did they order them with the hope/expectation that scope would be relaxed?
It's almost certain that SKW leveraged the MRJ orders to get better terms from embrear, which essentially has become a monopoly since bombardier has essentially resigned from the RJ market due to lack of relevant products going forward..
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,940
What's to stop Mitsubishi from doing this as well, in order to sell more planes to the US regional market? Also, if they don't do this, and if scope doesn't change for any of the US mainline, what are OO and TSA going to do with their planes on order? Did they order them with the hope/expectation that scope would be relaxed?
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
I'm the tool because I called you out for not knowing what you're taking about? Maybe you can tell us which regional's routes mighty Skywest is taking over next?
#65
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 42
That is funny you bring up the Dreamliner and Japanese quality - a huge problem with the Dreamliner was cracks in the wings due to parts made by? Yep, a company in Japan - Mitsubishi. And you don't think a large number of parts in this new plane will be built in China? Unless the US major airlines buy into this project then how do they plan on making money?
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Boeing reports wing cracks on 787 Dreamliners in production | Reuters
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,483
#68
That is a tired and RJ pilot myth on why they exist in the industry. Mainline has pay rates and work rules for the RJ. All management needs to do is put them in service at mainline. The big downside is all the RJ pilots that were locked in a bitter life timers that perpetuated the myth that mainline pilots put them in A corner get shown the door.
I highly suspect you were not in the industry when mainline forced RJ on the pilot groups. If you don't really know the history it would behoove you to learn so you don't sound so misinformed.
I highly suspect you were not in the industry when mainline forced RJ on the pilot groups. If you don't really know the history it would behoove you to learn so you don't sound so misinformed.
And tell me, which mainline pilot group voted down pay raises in order to prohibit RJs being flown by regionals? Which vote was that? I don't recall.
#69
So tell me, since work rules and pay rates are all in place as you say, what's stopping mainline mgmt from bringing every single RJ to mainline? Hmm?
And tell me, which mainline pilot group voted down pay raises in order to prohibit RJs being flown by regionals? Which vote was that? I don't recall.
And tell me, which mainline pilot group voted down pay raises in order to prohibit RJs being flown by regionals? Which vote was that? I don't recall.
Where were you in the late 90's? At my carrier we were sold a contract by our ALPA leaders that had way too many holes in scope. ALPA and the company agreed that the RJ would be used to supplement NOT replace mainline flying. They were give. 1 for 1 block hours of mainline and an ALPA oversight committee to make sure it was all legal. At an airline that operates lots of 13 hour flights that created 13, 1 hour RJ flights for the very one of our long haul segments. As they pulled down 727 and 737-200 flying on one hour segments they were replaced by guys like you jumping at the chance to fly new jet at 1/4 of the cost of a mainline pilot. That was like giving crack to airline management. They loved the whole thing.
So the pilots saw what happened and it took us until the last contact to correct the scope language. The fix is in and the tide has slowly turned in our favor on scope.
You like to paint the major pilots as the bad guys. Unless you have been at a regional since the days of all turboprop Ops then you are a big part of the problem. You had a big hand in continuing the use of RJ's. If you had said I'm not going to do that job for that wage it wouldn't have been as useful to management to kill mainline flying. If you have been at a regional since the turboprop days then you either failed major interviews or sat on the sidelines while the largest hiring boon post 1978 took place. I agree the major pilots contracts allowed for the use of RJ's but not in the manner they were implemented. However, when you look in the mirror realize you are a part of the problem also.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post