Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Will the MRJ fly at Skywest and TSA? >

Will the MRJ fly at Skywest and TSA?

Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Will the MRJ fly at Skywest and TSA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2016, 05:51 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,483
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Not one who parades on the internet claiming to have inside information about the private dealings of an airline when all they are qualified to do is fly airplanes.
Nope. You're just a tool bag who thinks he knows everything. It's pretty common knowledge that our COO has said the MRJ would never fly here. But what do I know, I just fly airplanes, oh, and parade.
word302 is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 06:14 PM
  #62  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by PackPilot View Post
What's to stop Mitsubishi from doing this as well, in order to sell more planes to the US regional market? Also, if they don't do this, and if scope doesn't change for any of the US mainline, what are OO and TSA going to do with their planes on order? Did they order them with the hope/expectation that scope would be relaxed?
Nobody has any real orders for that plane. Non firm orders are allowed by manufacturers because they're better than no orders, make good publicity, and might actually firm up at some point in the future.

It's almost certain that SKW leveraged the MRJ orders to get better terms from embrear, which essentially has become a monopoly since bombardier has essentially resigned from the RJ market due to lack of relevant products going forward..
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 06:39 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,940
Default

Originally Posted by PackPilot View Post
What's to stop Mitsubishi from doing this as well, in order to sell more planes to the US regional market? Also, if they don't do this, and if scope doesn't change for any of the US mainline, what are OO and TSA going to do with their planes on order? Did they order them with the hope/expectation that scope would be relaxed?
The airplane is going to be 2 years late anyway, is there even a binding agreement in that case...
tom11011 is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 07:04 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Default

Originally Posted by word302 View Post
Nope. You're just a tool bag who thinks he knows everything. It's pretty common knowledge that our COO has said the MRJ would never fly here. But what do I know, I just fly airplanes, oh, and parade.
I'm the tool because I called you out for not knowing what you're taking about? Maybe you can tell us which regional's routes mighty Skywest is taking over next?
CBreezy is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 07:16 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 42
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku View Post
That is funny you bring up the Dreamliner and Japanese quality - a huge problem with the Dreamliner was cracks in the wings due to parts made by? Yep, a company in Japan - Mitsubishi. And you don't think a large number of parts in this new plane will be built in China? Unless the US major airlines buy into this project then how do they plan on making money?
gonna have to ask for a link on that, because all I heard about was cracks in the windows and problems with the batteries.
Ordell is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 08:09 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

Originally Posted by Ordell View Post
gonna have to ask for a link on that, because all I heard about was cracks in the windows and problems with the batteries.
Not that hard to find, just Google Dreamliner wing cracks:

Boeing reports wing cracks on 787 Dreamliners in production | Reuters
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 09:28 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,483
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I'm the tool because I called you out for not knowing what you're taking about? Maybe you can tell us which regional's routes mighty Skywest is taking over next?
I'm not really sure where your butthurt is coming from, but it's laughable at best.
word302 is offline  
Old 09-02-2016, 09:48 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,852
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne View Post
That is a tired and RJ pilot myth on why they exist in the industry. Mainline has pay rates and work rules for the RJ. All management needs to do is put them in service at mainline. The big downside is all the RJ pilots that were locked in a bitter life timers that perpetuated the myth that mainline pilots put them in A corner get shown the door.

I highly suspect you were not in the industry when mainline forced RJ on the pilot groups. If you don't really know the history it would behoove you to learn so you don't sound so misinformed.
So tell me, since work rules and pay rates are all in place as you say, what's stopping mainline mgmt from bringing every single RJ to mainline? Hmm?

And tell me, which mainline pilot group voted down pay raises in order to prohibit RJs being flown by regionals? Which vote was that? I don't recall.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 09-03-2016, 04:20 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina View Post
So tell me, since work rules and pay rates are all in place as you say, what's stopping mainline mgmt from bringing every single RJ to mainline? Hmm?

And tell me, which mainline pilot group voted down pay raises in order to prohibit RJs being flown by regionals? Which vote was that? I don't recall.
Why? Because guys like you are willing to do it for a few dollars less than mainline. We have tightened the scope language we have put the rates of pay in the contract. Until guys like you stop lining up to fly those shiny jets they won't move to mainline.

Where were you in the late 90's? At my carrier we were sold a contract by our ALPA leaders that had way too many holes in scope. ALPA and the company agreed that the RJ would be used to supplement NOT replace mainline flying. They were give. 1 for 1 block hours of mainline and an ALPA oversight committee to make sure it was all legal. At an airline that operates lots of 13 hour flights that created 13, 1 hour RJ flights for the very one of our long haul segments. As they pulled down 727 and 737-200 flying on one hour segments they were replaced by guys like you jumping at the chance to fly new jet at 1/4 of the cost of a mainline pilot. That was like giving crack to airline management. They loved the whole thing.

So the pilots saw what happened and it took us until the last contact to correct the scope language. The fix is in and the tide has slowly turned in our favor on scope.

You like to paint the major pilots as the bad guys. Unless you have been at a regional since the days of all turboprop Ops then you are a big part of the problem. You had a big hand in continuing the use of RJ's. If you had said I'm not going to do that job for that wage it wouldn't have been as useful to management to kill mainline flying. If you have been at a regional since the turboprop days then you either failed major interviews or sat on the sidelines while the largest hiring boon post 1978 took place. I agree the major pilots contracts allowed for the use of RJ's but not in the manner they were implemented. However, when you look in the mirror realize you are a part of the problem also.
Lambourne is offline  
Old 09-03-2016, 07:09 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

This threads gone to plaid.
WesternSkies is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lovellrt
SkyWest
15181
02-25-2016 05:47 PM
Gundam
Career Questions
8
09-03-2014 10:00 PM
LivinTheDream28
Regional
92
02-25-2010 03:21 AM
328dude
GoJet
628
03-24-2009 09:33 AM
Koolaidman
Regional
20
12-27-2006 04:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices