Search

Notices

The commuter thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2023 | 10:40 AM
  #51  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 306
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

Why aren’t the FA bases working out?
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 10:49 AM
  #52  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 59
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
Why aren’t the FA bases working out?
Same reason BNA was going to open at the last rally.
Reply
Old 03-12-2023 | 07:35 PM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 101
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
Why aren’t the FA bases working out?

They’re very small. Part of the deal with being on a satellite base is that you have to find your own sick coverage and that works as well as you might imagine. Not the best look during a pandemic, but I’m not the one who decided to open them.
Reply
Old 03-13-2023 | 12:11 PM
  #54  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 306
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

I know they have one in AUS. Where is the other, FLL?
Reply
Old 03-13-2023 | 12:44 PM
  #55  
Mozam's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 128
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
I know they have one in AUS. Where is the other, FLL?



Yes…. Filler
Reply
Old 03-13-2023 | 01:29 PM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 244
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
STL is what it is and will probably stay that way until the city comes to the realization that SWA is the only game in town and will be for some time. STL got burned big time by TWA, so I can't say that I blame them for being risk averse. There used to be a thriving community where the extra runway that they no longer need is located.
Their current plan is to demolish Terminal 2 and consolidate to terminal 1 and renovate it. I actually think that is a solid plan. It is a good connector station and a midway reliever airport. Overnights are cheap. It won't become a crew base.
BNA is just too close to ATL. Most of the growth there in the future isn't SWA related. Unless there is some sort of mini domicile or virtual base plan, I wouldn't be too bullish on it becoming a base either.
KCI I could actually see. Splits the difference between MDW and DEN. The city has made a huge commitment. Better customer experience for connectors. They can play it against STL.

I don't think SWA is opening another traditional crew base for at least 5 more years, if ever. I think the future is growing our network in conus, especially out west, followed by more slow network growth in profitable US markets.

I don't run an airline, though.
Oh, good… we’re gonna grow out west. JFC!
Reply
Old 03-13-2023 | 03:13 PM
  #57  
weekends off? Nope...
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 133
Default

Originally Posted by tanker
In my NH class in 1994 the VP of Schedule Planning said that BNA would never be a base because they could originate a plane on the East Coast and get it to BNA in time to be an originator. Basically getting an extra leg out of it. If they did that with numerous East Coast originators that would make it difficult to justify a base. There, now you have a clue
And AW has recently said those early flights out of BWI dont make any money because what business traveler needs to be in BNA by 0600? It’s too big a base to have that many airplanes/crews originating non-profitable flights, basically.
Reply
Old 03-13-2023 | 04:29 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 396
Default

Originally Posted by KPer
Oh, good… we’re gonna grow out west. JFC!
Southwest makes the majority of its money in the western half of the US. California business travelers have money to spend and love frequency. This next year is pretty much devoted to adding frequency. You can bet the majority of that is going to be in the western United States.
There is a reason that SWA defends that turf with a vengeance.
Reply
Old 03-13-2023 | 07:11 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Puckpilot78
I guess the real question is: does the new MCI terminal have crew lounges?...
Apparently yes the new MCI terminal has crew lounges and already has signs posted for said crew lounges…
Reply
Old 03-13-2023 | 07:28 PM
  #60  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 997
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Southwest makes the majority of its money in the western half of the US. California business travelers have money to spend and love frequency. This next year is pretty much devoted to adding frequency. You can bet the majority of that is going to be in the western United States.
There is a reason that SWA defends that turf with a vengeance.
In the East, Southwest is an airline for flying kids to Orlando to see Mickey or get to a cruise port.

In the West, Southwest is an airline for business people. Including the BUR-LAS flights.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rxsanche
Air Wisconsin
9
07-05-2018 03:09 PM
Cyio
Envoy Airlines
41
06-03-2018 03:20 PM
Pelican
Alaska
820
11-27-2016 04:11 PM
flybynuts
Major
3
01-19-2015 05:53 PM
bluebird
JetBlue
2
08-27-2005 06:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices