Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Ya, I know it's not going to change, but... >

Ya, I know it's not going to change, but...

Search

Notices

Ya, I know it's not going to change, but...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2021, 02:50 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,695
Default

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
Wow RJS, for once, I agree with most everything you said. Blue moon?
We agree on a lot more than you think, brother.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 11-10-2021, 07:30 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,886
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
The issue isn't necessarily "portable seniority" but rather pay portability and how pay is determined, structured and banded. Why is there so much difference between the top and bottom FO and then captain and FO, especially in today's age of CRM where if the captain screws up, the FO is also on the hook. There is also an arguable difference in relevant experience between say an F-teener and a regional airline captain. Not to take away anything from F-teeners, but their learning curve tends to be substantially more vertical than say a regional airline captain. Why are they both getting paid the same starting out?!

I've always maintained that seniority should reward loyalty, but it shouldn't be the end-all-be-all. For example, schedules and vacations should absolutely be by seniority. Pay should be more about experience. Lumping it all together doesn't benefit the pilots. It actually hurts us because 1) unlike other unionized sectors, we already can't strike when our contract is up and 2) we can't vote with our feet if we have any sort of longevity because of how we structured our compensation. And finally, watch this thread... you'll have pilots defending the very system that hurts their ability to make more money and enhance their profession.
Keeping longevity would be awesome. Start at the bottom and go to the 12 yr pay scale…or whatever you get tossed on the street at.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 11-10-2021, 08:46 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 91
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
professors do well to make as much as a regional captain

attorneys largely build a local client base and, if successful, are very tightly bound to that one place

doctors likewise build a reputation and it is difficult to move - certainly difficult to make a big move up

all of these professions have better mobility than pilots but it’s rare that someone can make a major forward leap mid-career
This. Pilots can’t really distinguish themselves much from their peers. The reward system is purely based on persistence, resilience, and mostly luck. It’s by design and I feel a National seniority list would be less fair than an ALPA minimum wage so we don’t lose our shirt as a preferred hire from a defunct ALPA carrier.
YangGang2020 is offline  
Old 11-11-2021, 01:19 AM
  #14  
Spikes the Koolaid
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: 737
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
Keeping longevity would be awesome. Start at the bottom and go to the 12 yr pay scale…or whatever you get tossed on the street at.
in a perfect world this is exactly how it should be. I'll even go one step further and say you should keep ALL longevity benefits like pay, vesting, retirement benefits, LoL benefits, duration (not bidding) of vacations, etc.

The problem I see with it, though, is that it will create a real disincentive for hiring departments to hire fellow experienced pilots who are out of work due to no fault of their own. Could there be a way around that? Maybe. But that's the sticking point I think.
waterskisabersw is offline  
Old 11-11-2021, 02:06 AM
  #15  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,697
Default

Seems like pay is the main issue.

The only way to do this would be if all pilots were employed by a single entity and were then offered out as contractors so to speak.

All 121 carriers would have to agree to a single set of work rules.

Not all carriers have the same aircraft, size, or financial capabilities, so how could a company like Breeze afford the same as Delta? Would the list be just the big four?

Just spitballing here.
at6d is offline  
Old 11-11-2021, 02:29 AM
  #16  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,797
Default

Every few years this comes up, and every few years it recedes. It’s often suggested during periods of stagnation or layoffs and then quickly forgotten when all of the airlines are hiring like crazy. I’m not dismissing the idea, but the logistics of getting the airlines to all agree to it would be a massive challenge - and then, would it only apply to ALPA pilots from ALPA carriers? Which ALPA DOH would apply - your current company, or your first ALPA DOH? Would it be instituted for existing pilots, or for all pilots hired after the date of signing? Let’s say there’s a Mesa Captain who has been at Mesa for 25 years, never able to move on because he has no degree, 3 DUIs, several checkride busts, and was briefly detained during an unfortunate incident on an overnight in El Paso during which he ventured across the border to by pharmaceuticals… can he take his 25 years of seniority and step right into the left seat at United?

For better or for worse we are married to the companies we work for. (Unless you want to be like me and bounce around for a couple of decades between furloughs and chasing greener pastures, but I don’t recommend this technique).

Negotiating capital is better spent getting the company to agree to pay retro for retirees who left during lengthy negotiations, and for continued cost of living increases during negotiations that continue beyond the amendable date of the CBA. There have to be financial disincentives for the company to string along negotiations for years and years. And maybe agreements between unions to establish a floor for compensation, work rules, retirement and ancillary benefits that no pilot group can sign an agreement that goes below that floor. (Looking at you Breeze…)
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 11-11-2021, 03:44 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,524
Default Ya, I know it's not going to change, but...

National seniority? Terrible idea.

We aren't doctors or lawyers or corporate managers. There are schools to go to if you want to be part of those career fields. I have family and friends that practice law and work in a corporate setting. They hate their jobs but make great money.

Sorry, but the sooner pilots stop comparing ourselves to those professions, the better. It's only hurting us as a group.

The best thing we can all do is to fight for good contracts at our respective carriers. The labor market will work its way out.

Otherwise, roll the dice and choose wisely. That, and turn your head forward and quit looking back. Plenty of SkyWest and Envoy lifers that I am sure are much happier people and more enjoyable to be around than some of the miserable dooshes in both seats that I run across from time to time at work.

If you want to make a lateral move in this career, it's a financial and qol kick in the junk. Just accept it as a part of doing business.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 11-11-2021, 04:36 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,695
Default

Here's the crux of the problem. 1st year FO makes 44% of what the topped out 12th year FO makes and 31% of what the topped out captain makes. Why? Experience? BS!

Having spent time flying overseas, you don't see this type of pay disparity. The pay structure is much flatter and seniority, while it does have a role, does not define your entire existence.

As for airlines "not having incentives to hire experienced pilot", I'll call BS on that too, especially these days. Think insurance carriers would have a thing or two to say about that one.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 11-11-2021, 04:52 AM
  #19  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,558
Default

The segment of industry where this concept applies is private business aviation...not collectively bargained, seniority-based airlines.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 11-11-2021, 08:23 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,886
Default

Originally Posted by waterskisabersw
in a perfect world this is exactly how it should be. I'll even go one step further and say you should keep ALL longevity benefits like pay, vesting, retirement benefits, LoL benefits, duration (not bidding) of vacations, etc.

The problem I see with it, though, is that it will create a real disincentive for hiring departments to hire fellow experienced pilots who are out of work due to no fault of their own. Could there be a way around that? Maybe. But that's the sticking point I think.
That, and you’re effectively creating a B/C scale where new hires in the same class are being paid differently for pay and benefits. Interesting concept, but not sure how it’d play out in the real world.
flyguy81 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigTuna607
PSA Airlines
6
02-13-2019 12:20 AM
Bellanca
Flight Schools and Training
32
02-26-2011 02:18 PM
sellener
Flight Schools and Training
2
01-11-2011 03:24 PM
hair-on-fire
Union Talk
25
05-11-2010 05:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices