Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
When will First Officer training restart? >

When will First Officer training restart?

Search

Notices

When will First Officer training restart?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2025 | 07:14 AM
  #501  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 622
Likes: 108
From: 737CA
Default

Originally Posted by Proximity
The PDEW restrictions, especially for the Atlantic region, seem very restrictive (which is a good thing). Even with just Iceland Air, how long before we start to exceed the 375 daily PDEW restriction? Looks like they average 20 flights per day to United States, however, some of these flights arrive at cities where we are unlikely to capture interline pax (ORD, JFK, MIA).
Thats a great question. I would assume SWAPA came up with that through it's EFA guys. I would bet though it will be a long time before those numbers are breached. The transition to something like this, will take years. SWA maybe a big domestic carrier, but it's non existent outside of CONUS. The near international we do just compliments the domestic network without much complexity in the big scheme of things. Even with ETOPS, those birds do both mainland and ETOPS. Natural extension of the domestic network. Especially on the p2p front. The majority of POS to Europe on the big three is the US. I would assume the same for the Pacific side. Since SWA is the largest domestic airline, partnerships just create an opportunity to extend the network without much risk. If it gets to that point, well, thats a good problem to have.
Reply
Old 05-31-2025 | 07:25 AM
  #502  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 44
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Proximity
The PDEW restrictions, especially for the Atlantic region, seem very restrictive (which is a good thing). Even with just Iceland Air, how long before we start to exceed the 375 daily PDEW restriction? Looks like they average 20 flights per day to United States, however, some of these flights arrive at cities where we are unlikely to capture interline pax (ORD, JFK, MIA).
Why are you ruling out ORD? MDW is maxed out until the city buys out nearby homes to expand (which will likely never happen). The only logical way to expand in an already large Chicago market is to grow ORD. Add another codeshare partner (or 2) and you'll have lots of intl feed coming to ORD to fill planes.

Add to the rumor that Delta might get the boot from their gate positions at Terminal 5 so we could move back into those better located gates and there's a strong likelihood it'll happen sooner than later.
Reply
Old 05-31-2025 | 07:44 AM
  #503  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 622
Likes: 108
From: 737CA
Default

Originally Posted by OverUnderDone
Why are you ruling out ORD? MDW is maxed out until the city buys out nearby homes to expand (which will likely never happen). The only logical way to expand in an already large Chicago market is to grow ORD. Add another codeshare partner (or 2) and you'll have lots of intl feed coming to ORD to fill planes.

Add to the rumor that Delta might get the boot from their gate positions at Terminal 5 so we could move back into those better located gates and there's a strong likelihood it'll happen sooner than later.
SWA will never have a European gateway or any real international presence out of Chicago. That geography is already taken and well established by others. MDW is a great connect point for the SWA network. It works well for what it was intended for. ORD just compliments what SWA has in MDW.
Reply
Old 05-31-2025 | 07:48 AM
  #504  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 994
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by OverUnderDone
Why are you ruling out ORD? MDW is maxed out until the city buys out nearby homes to expand (which will likely never happen). The only logical way to expand in an already large Chicago market is to grow ORD. Add another codeshare partner (or 2) and you'll have lots of intl feed coming to ORD to fill planes.

Add to the rumor that Delta might get the boot from their gate positions at Terminal 5 so we could move back into those better located gates and there's a strong likelihood it'll happen sooner than later.
I’m actually a big proponent of ORD and was disappointed they pulled back there. MDW is inconvenient for much of the Chicago area, doesn’t have good approaches, and as you say it is totally maxed out. The gate situation isn’t great either with the shared gates.

I’m just being realistic that with limited ORD service we won’t capture much international traffic from Iceland Air with the current schedule. Good news is that we have our foot in the door there unlike JFK. Service could be increased. I’m also hoping with the complete ORD overhaul going on we can get more gates in a more convenient location.

However, BWI, BNA, and STL make more sense in the Southwest network to connect international.
Reply
Old 05-31-2025 | 08:30 AM
  #505  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 44
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by REF 5
SWA will never have a European gateway or any real international presence out of Chicago. That geography is already taken and well established by others. MDW is a great connect point for the SWA network. It works well for what it was intended for. ORD just compliments what SWA has in MDW.
I hear ya. Never implied we'd start any international service of our own out of ORD, but there's no doubt that large international feed will fill planes. Furthermore - we have a hard enough time lifting out of MDW on longer flights with full loads in the MAX. A shift to ORD for some of the more popular routes would make sense and attract more of the NW suburb crowd.

Originally Posted by Proximity
I’m actually a big proponent of ORD and was disappointed they pulled back there. MDW is inconvenient for much of the Chicago area, doesn’t have good approaches, and as you say it is totally maxed out. The gate situation isn’t great either with the shared gates.

I’m just being realistic that with limited ORD service we won’t capture much international traffic from Iceland Air with the current schedule. Good news is that we have our foot in the door there unlike JFK. Service could be increased. I’m also hoping with the complete ORD overhaul going on we can get more gates in a more convenient location.

However, BWI, BNA, and STL make more sense in the Southwest network to connect international.
Completely agree. I live very close to ORD and was looking forward to the chance to bid lines out of there. Wishful thinking but still jump at the LRF trips whenever they pop up!

When more international partnerships are announced - the traffic at ORD will undoubtedly increase. Throw in better gate locations and it only increases traffic and convenience. The only intl airlines at MDW are Volaris and Porter. Would be a joke to partner with either at this stage so let's rule them out. Throw in a large Asia and South America feed and load factors are going to jump significantly.

No doubt there will be future intl expansion at BWI and BNA, and I could see it at STL as well if you target it as future base. All have the infrastructure to handle the larger aircraft - unlike MDW. In any case - I was happy to see the TPA route return and increased routes out of ORD this spring and summer. Hoping the trend continues.
Reply
Old 05-31-2025 | 09:41 AM
  #506  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 622
Likes: 108
From: 737CA
Default

SWA has a market share of 91% out of MDW. Frontier is next with 5% and Delta is 2%. SWA does almost 25% of the total Chicago market. Its huge. Of the top 10 O&D city pairs that SWA flies in its whole system, three of them are out of Chicago. It is a very important part of the network. Yields are definitely above the system average. If you drive north to ORD, UAL has 30%, AAL is 23% and Skywest is next at 8%. SWA doesn't even register in the top 5. They lumped in as "others". When ATA gave up those gates to SWA in MDW, that airport became a very important piece of the network and still is to this day. Of the five largest carriers, only Delta flies into MDW. It's a pain in the a** sometimes going in and out there from a aviators point of view but it's a money maker. If SWA had their way, their would be a 8000-9000 ft runway. It would be ideal for a gateway. We all know that won't happen. So the next best thing is pretty much a monopolistic airport. ORD is another spoke in the system. When you listen to BJ talk partnerships and airports, its the mega's that have dominate market share where SWA controls the market. Other than Love Field, which is forbidden, all the other mega's is where partnerships will make the most sense.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ESQ702
Allegiant
11
12-12-2022 10:25 AM
RNO Flyer
Career Questions
44
05-27-2022 05:41 PM
docav8tor
Safety
7
08-18-2019 04:04 PM
TonyC
FedEx
27
01-23-2019 06:06 PM
NoHaz
Cargo
6
04-04-2010 09:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices