Notices

Side Letter Rumor?

Old 05-26-2025 | 05:40 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 162
Default Side Letter Rumor?

Anyone have the details on the rumor our BoD voted to try and have are vacation overlap changed?
Reply
Old 05-26-2025 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
mulcher's Avatar
gets time off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 98
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio
Anyone have the details on the rumor our BoD voted to try and have are vacation overlap changed?
Go to FB NCR page or the swapull forum. It’s all on those two.
Reply
Old 05-27-2025 | 07:47 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 654
Likes: 132
From: 737CA
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio
Anyone have the details on the rumor our BoD voted to try and have are vacation overlap changed?
As always, the skeptics come out but don’t have the full picture. Anytime you can put language that codifies what is already in practice is a good thing. SWAPA comm should have done a better job explaining. In the end, a nothing burger. SRC Chairman did a good job explaining what they were trying to do.
Reply
Old 05-27-2025 | 07:52 AM
  #4  
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 836
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by REF 5
As always, the skeptics come out but don’t have the full picture. Anytime you can put language that codifies what is already in practice is a good thing. SWAPA comm should have done a better job explaining. In the end, a nothing burger. SRC Chairman did a good job explaining what they were trying to do.
What he said. Inserting language to codify what has been past practice. The BoD understands giving away VOD would have been very, very bad.
Reply
Old 05-27-2025 | 08:55 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 282
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL
What he said. Inserting language to codify what has been past practice. The BoD understands giving away VOD would have been very, very bad.

But they weren’t giving anything away I read the language! What did I miss ? It all started with some guy on Facebook posting BS
Reply
Old 05-27-2025 | 09:42 AM
  #6  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 484
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by REF 5
As always, the skeptics come out but don’t have the full picture. Anytime you can put language that codifies what is already in practice is a good thing. SWAPA comm should have done a better job explaining. In the end, a nothing burger. SRC Chairman did a good job explaining what they were trying to do.
then why did that fail? There has to be more to it.
Reply
Old 05-27-2025 | 09:55 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 654
Likes: 132
From: 737CA
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
then why did that fail? There has to be more to it.
I don’t pretend to know but the intent of what SRC Chairman explained was clear. Something that is practiced by the company and is agreement with SWAPA should be codified in language. Fix it.
Reply
Old 05-27-2025 | 10:34 AM
  #8  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 484
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by REF 5
I don’t pretend to know but the intent of what SRC Chairman explained was clear. Something that is practiced by the company and is agreement with SWAPA should be codified in language. Fix it.
I agree the language should be codified but maybe this language wasn't correct and that's why 17 -10 NO .
Or maybe they did a bad job of educating the BOD.
sure would be nice if we got more than " what's being said on FB is false".
Reply
Old 05-27-2025 | 11:15 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,590
Likes: 434
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
I agree the language should be codified but maybe this language wasn't correct and that's why 17 -10 NO .
Or maybe they did a bad job of educating the BOD.
sure would be nice if we got more than " what's being said on FB is false".
Yep. Comm on this was horrible. I don't mean to interrupt the full time trip pull pilots that we are paying 400k plus to do this stuff, but maybe don't peace out for a 4 day weekend and not tell anyone what happened with this side letter.
It didn't help that they became super defensive when challenged on it.
Reply
Old 05-27-2025 | 11:20 AM
  #10  
mulcher's Avatar
gets time off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 98
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
I agree the language should be codified but maybe this language wasn't correct and that's why 17 -10 NO .
Or maybe they did a bad job of educating the BOD.
sure would be nice if we got more than " what's being said on FB is false".
So we already had language that worked so then we wanted to change it. When we did it created a hole for SWA to try and exploit. Would they? I trust swapull very little and SWA less. Why the change and why was it voted down. Questions swapullies don’t want to answer for some reason. They just say it was fine and RM wanted clicks. That was a stupid comment. I’m no RM fan but if he can read it a certain way so can SWA.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ottolillienthal
United
93
05-02-2012 07:07 AM
SheriffWydell
Cargo
153
04-12-2012 03:16 PM
Low & Slow
Major
7
05-26-2009 07:41 PM
ladesaparecida
Flight Schools and Training
5
12-07-2008 11:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices