Search

Notices

Rumor Mill 737-900ER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2012, 07:08 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by captjns
In our part of the world during monsoon season, its not uncommon to experience conditions of ISA +20 to +25. With the 900 one is stuck a couple of thousand feet above turboprop operators... not nearly enough to clear the CBs when at Max Weight.
What turboprops? The last prop plane I flew was certified to FL410 at max weight.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 12-26-2012, 09:28 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,947
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
What turboprops? The last prop plane I flew was certified to FL410 at max weight.
I'll bet wasn't a -900
captjns is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 12:29 AM
  #73  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 36N15
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by mike734
Those who say the -900 is a slug. Are you talking about the -900ER? I haven't flown it yet but with the short field wing and the 27k power I expect it is much better than the early 900s. Anyone? .
I flew 402 back from the East Coast. It's a pig like the old ones. Going to Hawaii in them is going to suck.
Moby Dick is offline  
Old 12-29-2012, 08:37 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: erb
Posts: 646
Default Hope Christmas was Grand...had to fly.

Originally Posted by buzzpat
I think he's kidding Mike. Lighten up.
Thank You Brother! 7 years on the tiller Mike. As always...my Buzz "speaks for me." Cheers...H
Herman is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 03:55 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
yoke jerker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 174
Default

the 900ER handles like a 71 Ford F100 pickup with out of line front end and no power steering... the 800 much smoother
yoke jerker is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 05:48 PM
  #76  
Line Holder
 
sparerib11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: on the street
Posts: 39
Default

Those who say the -900 is a slug. Are you talking about the -900ER? I haven't flown it yet but with the short field wing and the 27k power I expect it is much better than the early 900s. Anyone?
I haven't flown the 900ER yet either but SFP and 27K might help in a few takeoff situations: more thrust, flaps 25. Once the thing is in the air it's just a potentially heavier 900.

On landing the spoilers should stick up higher than a non-SFP. I'm told the 2 position tailskid lowers v-speeds but again I haven't touched the plane yet to see if it is noticeable (it probably isn't due to larger weights).

Can it make $$? Yes.
sparerib11 is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 12:06 PM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
Bobine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 31
Default

Who give a crap how it climbs or what altitude it goes to. Bottom line is How much it pays.
Bobine is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 09:14 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,947
Default

Originally Posted by sparerib11
I haven't flown the 900ER yet either but SFP and 27K might help in a few takeoff situations: more thrust, flaps 25. Once the thing is in the air it's just a potentially heavier 900.

On landing the spoilers should stick up higher than a non-SFP. I'm told the 2 position tailskid lowers v-speeds but again I haven't touched the plane yet to see if it is noticeable (it probably isn't due to larger weights).

Can it make $$? Yes.

SFP, all smoke and mirrors. Just like Reisbeck Stage II Conversions for the 727.

Flaps 40 Autobrake 2, and I still make the same turn off with or whether in a Short Field Performance slug or a normal slug. However I do miss the LEDs to full extend at Flaps 10 for the bit of added for smoother decelaration during the approach.

Be it 26 or the 27k motors, the slug, at max ROTW still can't get out of its own weight on a 42C day.

But at the end of the day, it's the most reliable of the Boeings I've flown with only two Mx departure delays in my 8 years on the slug. One was a false vibration indication after start, and a PSEU light illuminated after start. That problem was cured by rebooting the jet under the adult supervision of MAINTROL.
captjns is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 12:27 PM
  #79  
New boss = Old boss
 
mike734's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Ca B737
Posts: 2,762
Default

Originally Posted by captjns
SFP, all smoke and mirrors. Just like Reisbeck Stage II Conversions for the 727.

Flaps 40 Autobrake 2, and I still make the same turn off with or whether in a Short Field Performance slug or a normal slug. However I do miss the LEDs to full extend at Flaps 10 for the bit of added for smoother decelaration during the approach.

Be it 26 or the 27k motors, the slug, at max ROTW still can't get out of its own weight on a 42C day.

But at the end of the day, it's the most reliable of the Boeings I've flown with only two Mx departure delays in my 8 years on the slug. One was a false vibration indication after start, and a PSEU light illuminated after start. That problem was cured by rebooting the jet under the adult supervision of MAINTROL.
The SFP is not about landing. It is all about better second segment climb. Delaying the full extention of the LEDs until after flaps 25 means you can use flaps 25 for take off and climb better with an engine failure because the LEDs are not sticking all the way out.

I just flew the 900ER and I have to say it did handle too heavy. There was something weird in the roll feel. It felt artificial. Landing speeds were noticeably lower however so that was good. Ours are delivered without an RMI. It turns out I miss it. I never knew how much I looked at that thing until it was gone.
mike734 is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 08:42 AM
  #80  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by captjns
One of the better assests of the slug... .

The "slug" would be the 767-400 with any load and a max TO 767-300.
EWR73FO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
threeighteen
Southwest
48
12-15-2011 08:29 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
vagabond
Technical
4
10-31-2010 01:43 AM
Freight Dog
Major
61
02-26-2007 07:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices