Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Could SWA be looking after AA/US ??? >

Could SWA be looking after AA/US ???

Search

Notices

Could SWA be looking after AA/US ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2013 | 07:38 PM
  #31  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rolf
Candide,

You missed my point. If the award was straight relative or a staple, it is water under the bridge. I get their argument and I very much get ours. The point I was trying to make (poorly): WE are going to be facing issues in the future that can easier be won, if we don't **** off any more people on our seniority list than we need. I think we can get more accomplished if we at least hear each others grievances and scratch each others backs. Probably utopian but wine does that. For the record, my objection to this integration isn't so much the list (relative seniority wouldn't have been fair, imo) but the implementation and lack of remedies for those harmed.

Rolf

Rolf,

Your candor and extremely sensible worldview make it difficult for me to remain in character.

I'm glad that we'll be working together by 2015. Go Vikes!
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 04:55 AM
  #32  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Y'all are forgetting Delta. There is no way that they sit on the sidelines and allow a competitor to buy into JFK with out making it extremely expensive. If they don't buy JBU outright, I'd expect them to run up the price for SWA ala Crandell screwing Ron Allen over Pan Am.
Reply
Old 02-21-2013 | 06:14 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

I'll bring my stapler!
Reply
Old 02-22-2013 | 06:30 AM
  #34  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
Y'all are forgetting Delta. There is no way that they sit on the sidelines and allow a competitor to buy into JFK with out making it extremely expensive. If they don't buy JBU outright, I'd expect them to run up the price for SWA ala Crandell screwing Ron Allen over Pan Am.
Like they let SWA waltz into their ATL hub and buy Airtran without any fuss?

I'll put on my aluminum beanie for a moment and say that Gary Kelly and Richard Anderson have a good professional relationship and know they can co-exist together. I've heard the 717 transaction was a sweetheart deal for Delta, and I wouldnt be surprised to see a similar arrangement if SWA bought JB (320/321s and 190s).
Reply
Old 02-22-2013 | 09:33 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: 73 capt
Default

Candide

Step away from the crack pipe.
Reply
Old 02-23-2013 | 04:37 PM
  #36  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Like they let SWA waltz into their ATL hub and buy Airtran without any fuss?
Delta didn't need the AirTran feed into ATL and quite possibly needed a LCC to keep the appearance that there is competition in Atlanta. It's not like SWA has done anything but shrink the AirTran footprint anyway.

JFK is another story. JetBlue offers an instant domestic feed as opposed to LGA, where all the feed is now. Trust RA at your peril. The 717s were a sweetheart deal, but don't expect Delta to look the other way if someone else makes a play to grow in JFK.

Anyway, JetBlue will probably be bought by someone else before SWA has finished choking down the remmnants of AirTran.
Reply
Old 02-23-2013 | 09:22 PM
  #37  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Moby Dick

The problem is, with $1.6B in the bank, a smart arbitrager could figure out how to buy AS with AS's own money.

Either way, there would be fireworks in the board rooms.
Meh. I don't think that airline LBOs similar to those of the 80s are as likely anymore. Could be wrong, but I highly doubt it.


There would be fireworks, dat be true though.
Reply
Old 02-23-2013 | 09:30 PM
  #38  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Like they let SWA waltz into their ATL hub and buy Airtran without any fuss?

I'll put on my aluminum beanie for a moment and say that Gary Kelly and Richard Anderson have a good professional relationship and know they can co-exist together. I've heard the 717 transaction was a sweetheart deal for Delta, and I wouldnt be surprised to see a similar arrangement if SWA bought JB (320/321s and 190s).
And what did SWA do? **** off the business travelers that AirTran had. Good move... and thanks by the way. Hopefully they will be on DAL metal in the coming months/years. We really appreciate their business. Oh, and the 717 deal was a great deal for DAL. We are getting those airplanes practically for a song. GK was in over his head.

But you bring up an interesting theory.

You believe that if.. and it is a really big if... SWA bought JB that GK would then turn around and sell all the Airbusses? What would he then fly the routes with? Would he staple the JB pilots as well? His legacy would definitely be sealed at that point.
Reply
Old 02-24-2013 | 09:07 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Oh, and the 717 deal was a great deal for DAL. We are getting those airplanes practically for a song. GK was in over his head.
Kelly is a numbers guy, to suggest he is "in over his head" is simply not looking at the big picture. SWA has prospered in large part due to the single fleet type. The expense of keeping the 717's until the leases ran out outweighed the cost of getting rid of them quickly. Training pilots, mechanics and F.A.'s on two fleets, carrying spare parts for two fleets, and less revenue from a smaller aircraft in the same mission that a 737 already accomplishes in virtually every market does not make economic sense in the long term. If you think anything other than a serious cost benefit analysis led to the sale of the 717 you don't understand how Kelly operates. SWA will simply slow down retirements of the classic fleet to keep the fleet numbers flat while greatly increasing capacity.
Reply
Old 02-24-2013 | 09:37 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 168
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
if... SWA bought JB that GK would then turn around and sell all the Airbusses? What would he then fly the routes with? Would he staple the JB pilots as well? His legacy would definitely be sealed at that point.
I think he definately would. Operate separately and phase out as fast as 737's could roll off the line. I really don't think he'd nuke his pilot group by giving anything even remotely close to a partial or greater relative integration to an extremely junior pilot group. GK and SWAPA would likely agree to a Guadalupe-on-Steroids arrangement to get what they wanted, and nothing more.

Also, however it went down, it would likely be a 2, 3 or even 4 party deal. There are things many other airlines would want out of something like that. With a certain amount of forced divesture being inevitable to some degree, might as well divvy things up on the front end while further reducing exposure to a relative windfall potential by a young group. Not every airline CEO would care much about that one element of a deal, but I'd bet GK would, and to some extent RA and DP too, if for no other reason than to grease the skids during the next phase of their master plan(s).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brakes Set
Southwest
10
06-25-2012 10:03 PM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
brakechatter
Major
602
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices