Search

Notices

Type required

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2017 | 05:19 PM
  #11  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 449
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by fandango
https://www.southwest.com/html/about...ns/pilots.html

So It took so long. Looks like you beat me to it....
Dude you already work there, what's the deal stiring stuff up?
Reply
Old 02-03-2017 | 06:02 PM
  #12  
fandango's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: various and various
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
Dude you already work there, what's the deal stiring stuff up?
Guys in my class were asking each other because everyone has people trying to come here. That's all. Not stirring anything up. That's reason I asked a question. ..
Reply
Old 02-04-2017 | 04:50 AM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 80
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu
I think it is an old link. Look at the pilot bases listed, no Denver base listed and it has been around for nearly 5 years I believe.
I don't doubt its old info. But the link is active on their website. That was what the original question was referencing.
Reply
Old 02-04-2017 | 07:28 AM
  #14  
saturn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 41
From: Supreme Allied Commander
Default

SW recently did a presentation at a job fair and was asked this type rating question. It was then asked back, "how many here have a 737 type rating?", a few hands go up, then "how many have experience flying the 737?", nearly all hands go down. They then went on to say they'd been working to get rid of the emphasis on getting the type. Noted that having a lot of 737 experience makes it hard to fly the SW way, and that its easy to revert to old habits. That most paying for the type get them in sims with different variants and procedures than SW, creating a negative transfer of learning. They worked on adjusting their training curriculum since they removed the type rating for those without it. In short, no isn't needed, and becoming less and less preferred if at all. My personal take is it may say something about your commitment, but outside of that they kinda like to train from a clean slate.

Last edited by saturn; 02-04-2017 at 07:57 AM.
Reply
Old 02-04-2017 | 08:52 AM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

No it's not an old link. The type is going to be required again since new hires with out it are having difficultly getting through the training-their program wasn't designed for people with out the 73 type. Should be interesting to see where they're going to get these applicants.
Reply
Old 02-04-2017 | 09:40 AM
  #16  
Ohlsan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G650
No it's not an old link. The type is going to be required again since new hires with out it are having difficultly getting through the training-their program wasn't designed for people with out the 73 type. Should be interesting to see where they're going to get these applicants.
Where did you get that information, not trying to call you out, but it goes against a lot of info out there, I just need to know if I need to go get the type or not...
Reply
Old 02-04-2017 | 09:47 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 396
Default Type required

Originally Posted by G650
No it's not an old link. The type is going to be required again since new hires with out it are having difficultly getting through the training-their program wasn't designed for people with out the 73 type. Should be interesting to see where they're going to get these applicants.


False. Completely false.
No type required nor will it be. It is an old link and it does not surprise me that our IT people have left it up.
Reply
Old 02-04-2017 | 11:57 AM
  #18  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
False. Completely false.
No type required nor will it be. It is an old link and it does not surprise me that our IT people have left it up.
I figured some one would argue otherwise. This came down directly from the base chief pilot. Perhaps, he's wrong?
Reply
Old 02-04-2017 | 12:48 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 396
Default

Yes. If that info came from a Chief then he is wrong. It doesn't really shock me based on how out of touch most of the guys in the CPO are.
The type is not required now nor will it be. Period. That webpage was dug up and discussed already months ago on the union forum and the TA Facebook page. It is old hence the no Denver crew base. The current website says nothing about the type.
Email Rocky if you want to settle it. He is great about answering questions.
Reply
Old 02-04-2017 | 03:32 PM
  #20  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Email Rocky if you want to settle it. He is great about answering questions.
Would anybody be able to PM me Rocky's email address? Do you think he would answer someone who doesn't work for the company?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommuteAir
5416
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
nozzlebox
Flight Schools and Training
0
09-27-2015 07:42 AM
SkyHigh
GoJet
179
02-09-2009 07:14 AM
flyboyjake
Part 135
40
12-19-2008 12:20 PM
Sperl0863
Regional
20
12-27-2007 08:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices