![]() |
[
They never offered me too. Without that and a a nominal raise paid for by for by work rules you'll never catch up. Constantly towing the anchor. It's too late for me too now. They could've offered that when united did but they chose not to. We have proven our reasonableness. Management proved they were unreasonable in 2008-2010 and they are doing it again. They are the ones making the huge mistake I assure you |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2424815)
Instead of dragging your feet for years it would've been a lot smarter to take the 30% raise with current book and make it a three year deal with a me too clause after that point to take the average of your peers if they have increased by then.
It's far better to negotiate incremental improvements then swinging for the fences which rarely ever results in a home run if history is any indicator. It's also beyond laughable to include legacy pay in your calculations and it will be laughed at. You'll never get released with unrealistic expectations and actually you'll play right into management hands - the longer you hold out for a home run the longer they stockpile cheddar. As for not being able to staff that is also laughable as your classes are running nonstop and are full, so clearly compensation is not an issue attracting new hires. Wrong on multiple levels but it is interesting how you are bothered by us trying to achieve reaching Industry Standard. It's like the rednecks who supported slavery even though they could never afford one, as long as they are "better than someone". Pretty fng sad...... |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 2424981)
Wrong on multiple levels but it is interesting how you are bothered by us trying to achieve reaching Industry Standard. It's like the rednecks who supported slavery even though they could never afford one, as long as they are "better than someone". Pretty fng sad......
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Squeaky banana
(Post 2424992)
Totally agree. How does this kind of talk help anyone, except management?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk You know what else doesn't help anyone? Going to work for a company that you openly admit pays half the prevailing wage since at least 2013. Under cutting your ALPA brothers and sisters. You were willing to work subpar wages when you took the job and now it's all of a sudden no no? Hey, I guess ain't nothing wrong with going to work for Norwegian either making 10K/month as an 787 CA either as long as you complain about how you should be paid more. |
Originally Posted by Feng
(Post 2425016)
You know what else doesn't help anyone? Going to work for a company that you openly admit pays half the prevailing wage since at least 2013. Under cutting your ALPA brothers and sisters. You were willing to work subpar wages when you took the job and now it's all of a sudden no no?
Hey, I guess ain't nothing wrong with going to work for Norwegian either making 10K/month as an 787 CA either as long as you complain about how you should be paid more. Try again |
..............
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 2425024)
When Spirit Pilots signed their contract Airways TOP AIRBUS PAY was $125/hr., CALs first year pay was $29/hr with no healthcare........
Try again I mean, is that a gross exaggeration on my part? |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2424815)
Instead of dragging your feet for years it would've been a lot smarter to take the 30% raise with current book and make it a three year deal with a me too clause after that point to take the average of your peers if they have increased by then.
It's far better to negotiate incremental improvements then swinging for the fences which rarely ever results in a home run if history is any indicator. It's also beyond laughable to include legacy pay in your calculations and it will be laughed at. You'll never get released with unrealistic expectations and actually you'll play right into management hands - the longer you hold out for a home run the longer they stockpile cheddar. As for not being able to staff that is also laughable as your classes are running nonstop and are full, so clearly compensation is not an issue attracting new hires. I'll leave this to my Reps at the table, advised by some of the smartest minds in the game. |
Originally Posted by FML666
(Post 2424739)
Problem not solved. The ignore list only hides the original post but has no effect when the post is quoted.
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 2425024)
When Spirit Pilots signed their contract Airways TOP AIRBUS PAY was $125/hr., CALs first year pay was $29/hr with no healthcare........
Try again |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands