Search

Notices

This thing is a NO!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2018 | 09:43 PM
  #51  
Ed Force One's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 778
Likes: 16
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
This is how it is worded in the current contract as well...
Then I guess it's a good thing we haven't merged with anyone yet, now isn't it?
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 09:48 PM
  #52  
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One
Then I guess it's a good thing we haven't merged with anyone yet, now isn't it?
I mean (and I'm not trying to be a jerk I just can't remember) have we ever picketed on a company premise??? Which we should remember does not mean a public street outside of hq.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 09:48 PM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 729
Likes: 22
From: Bus CA
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One
I was a solid NO on page 1. Specifically 1-B-3

And if it's allowed, here's a repost of what I wrote in the "Section 1" thread:

1-D-g and 1-E-6

Protections lost in case of "Circumstance beyond the Company's control"

Now read in Section 2, "Definitions"

2-BE: "Circumstance Beyond The Company's Control" Includes Labor Dispute, Strike or PICKETING OF ANY OF THE COMPANY'S PREMISES


Merger protections lost if we so much as stage a harmless picket!

IMO, this is a hidden gotcha. We may read the phrase "Circumstances...." in the Scope language, but are we reading the definitions just as carefully as the Scope, Scheduling, Vacations, etc?
That is quite the little Easter egg. Any kind of work action (which now apparently includes informational picketing on your days off), and POOF, your section 1 is essentially gone. I’ve never seen anything like it.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 09:49 PM
  #54  
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
Default

Originally Posted by DrJekyll MrHyde
That is quite the little Easter egg. Any kind of work action (which now apparently includes informational picketing on your days off), and POOF, your section 1 is essentially gone. I’ve never seen anything like it.
Except during our previous contract? And it says picketing on THE COMPANY PREMISE. Not picketing at all, that would be dumb. Everyone chill and actually read entire sentences lol.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 09:51 PM
  #55  
Deathwish's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Except during our previous contract? And it says picketing on THE COMPANY PREMISE. Not picketing at all, that would be dumb. Everyone chill and actually read entire sentences lol.
And should be reading the TA with the current contract next to it.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 10:23 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Default

Well, I guess it’ll come down to whether you want the raise or not. Most of the stuff I see y’all complaining about, the legacies have it in one form or another, maybe the wording just need to be cleaned up a bit. It seems like 95% of it is industry standard practice and 5% is possibly worse. It seems to me that the current Spirit contract is written more for an 20 airplane charter outfit than for a large airline operation. This just streamline it to what an large airline needs to run its operation. Like someone else said, everyone on here was saying Spirit work rules is no better than anywhere else, now that the TA takes it away, what say you now?

With all that said, I hope this gets voted down. I’m really curious to see how this plays out. Wonder if they’ll give out an 100K new hire bonus. 30K first year, 30K second, 40K third.

I expect the theme of the union presentation/teleconference will be “yeah section...paragraph..is bad/worse than what we had...but it’s actually what UA/DAL/AA...etc have...blah blah blah.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 10:40 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Well, I guess it’ll come down to whether you want the raise or not. Most of the stuff I see y’all complaining about, the legacies have it in one form or another, maybe the wording just need to be cleaned up a bit. It seems like 95% of it is industry standard practice and 5% is possibly worse. It seems to me that the current Spirit contract is written more for an 20 airplane charter outfit than for a large airline operation. This just streamline it to what an large airline needs to run its operation. Like someone else said, everyone on here was saying Spirit work rules is no better than anywhere else, now that the TA takes it away, what say you now?

With all that said, I hope this gets voted down. I’m really curious to see how this plays out. Wonder if they’ll give out an 100K new hire bonus. 30K first year, 30K second, 40K third.

I expect the theme of the union presentation/teleconference will be “yeah section...paragraph..is bad/worse than what we had...but it’s actually what UA/DAL/AA...etc have...blah blah blah.
Worse than legacy work rules. Worse compensation.

Weak scope. They didn’t even attempt to buy the gutting of work rules. We expected concessions but this is a blood bath.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 10:43 PM
  #58  
Lincoln Osiris's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 164
From: NK CA
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Worse than legacy work rules. Worse compensation.

Weak scope. They didn’t even attempt to buy the gutting of work rules. We expected concessions but this is a blood bath.
Not trying to sell this turd by any means, thats ALPA's job. But worse than legacy work rules? Seriously? A bit dramatic aren't we? Have you even read any other legacies pilot contract before?
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 10:49 PM
  #59  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 495
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

When the Company or the union points to an isolated provision that appears in some Legacy contract, my answer would be “Fine. Let’s just adopt the entire contract.”

Of course they won’t go for that because—as so many so self-righteously point out—a contract is a package of benefits and burdens. Management loves to pull the worst parts out of a whole bunch of contracts while ignoring the fact that adopting the contract in its entirety would cost them waaay more than they are proposing.

This isn’t the menu at some Chinese restaurant. If management wants PBS because they claim it’s industry standard, then they also need to be OK with the industry standard terms that protect against the potential abuses of PBS. 5:15 min day. 3.5 to 1 trip rig. Minimum vacation credit, etc.
Reply
Old 02-02-2018 | 11:20 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
Not trying to sell this turd by any means, thats ALPA's job. But worse than legacy work rules? Seriously? A bit dramatic aren't we? Have you even read any other legacies pilot contract before?
Dramatic? Nope and read them, yes.

United, Delta, and southwest have better as a body of work. Jetblue probably too. Alaska is worse than this. AA on par

AA got industry leading compensation for their regional work rules at DOS.

They lost me at section 1 anyway
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
3
09-26-2012 04:21 PM
bulldog3
Foreign
1
06-20-2008 12:47 PM
АЕРОФЛОТ 214
Regional
28
04-08-2007 08:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices