![]() |
Originally Posted by dotslash
(Post 2525985)
Thank you Mr Queen of the Scope Age
He can Go(jet) with the flow. Thank you I’ll be here all week. |
Originally Posted by Gjn290
(Post 2525938)
It is apparent you cannot be reasoned with.
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2525970)
Profit sharing????
|
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 2526022)
I think Qotsa is on to something. Lets delay a contract by another 2 years so we can make sure to get profit sharing a lose more money in the process!
you didn't listen to your own advice Lincoln https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pN5XiTUqwM |
Originally Posted by SourGrapes
(Post 2526047)
2 years? no way Jose!!!! one side is very motivated......for many reasons
you didn't listen to your own advice Lincoln https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pN5XiTUqwM |
That's not just hysteria that is a fact. |
Originally Posted by astral
(Post 2526086)
NO that's worse than hysteria, it's lack of commitment, self worth, and B@lls.
|
Originally Posted by Gjn290
(Post 2525973)
I am in no way condoning a codeshare with NAI. I am 100% totally opposed to that.
Your personal lack of condoning will lose to contractual language that condones. Every time. |
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 2526022)
I think Qotsa is on to something. Lets delay a contract by another 2 years so we can make sure to get profit sharing a lose more money in the process!
|
Originally Posted by CMFIC
(Post 2525947)
290- although we don't agree, I appreciate a coherent comment.
If you really believe pilots are naive for thinking this is a cost neutral offer, you may want to review recent comments made by the CFO (soon to be CEO) of Spirit Airlines. Keep in mind, the CFO has the ultimate situational awareness of a company's finances. "Should the tentative agreement with our pilots be ratified, we will gain tools that will allow us to further improve our operational reliability and drive efficiencies, which gives us confidence that we will be able to maintain or grow our relative cost advantage," Pursuant to Securities Act of 1933 (SEC rules), section 4A, it would be illegal for an executive to make such misleading statements to the investment community. Can we agree this is offer is trading QOL for an industry lagging pay rate? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:49 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands