![]() |
[QUOTE=RJSAviator76;2545802]Once the bonus check is gone, your new work rules are in full gear, only then will you know if it was the right thing to do.
NMB will always tell any group they’ll “never release” them as long as the parties are negotiating. But once the TA is voted down, it’s a different ball game. Loss of pay going forward is only the case if you don’t *require* the full retro. There’s plenty of recent precedent for it. By accepting a fraction of a bonus, you provide the company with greater savings on dragging their feet. The fact that you got the largest percentage increase means your pay rates were grossly subpar and outdated and shouldn’t be considered too radical or special. You have no skin in the game in day to day operations because you don’t get profit sharing. Given the industry trends, you left a very big chunk of change on the table, likely to the tunes of tens of thousands of dollars per pilot. But in the end, I’m just an outside observer. You folks voted your conscience. It’s as simple as that. Congratulations on your new contract. Onto bigger and better things! That profit sharing is working out really well for B6 right now. Your argument is full of holes. |
Originally Posted by Flyondawall
(Post 2545816)
[That profit sharing is working out really well for B6 right now.
Your argument is full of holes. Ours is 11.3% for last year and is getting paid next week. It’s nice to have a skin in the game.... |
Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
(Post 2545802)
Once the bonus check is gone, your new work rules are in full gear, only then will you know if it was the right thing to do.
NMB will always tell any group they’ll “never release” them as long as the parties are negotiating. But once the TA is voted down, it’s a different ball game. Loss of pay going forward is only the case if you don’t *require* the full retro. There’s plenty of recent precedent for it. By accepting a fraction of a bonus, you provide the company with greater savings on dragging their feet. The fact that you got the largest percentage increase means your pay rates were grossly subpar and outdated and shouldn’t be considered too radical or special. You have no skin in the game in day to day operations because you don’t get profit sharing. Given the industry trends, you left a very big chunk of change on the table, likely to the tunes of tens of thousands of dollars per pilot. But in the end, I’m just an outside observer. You folks voted your conscience. It’s as simple as that. Congratulations on your new contract. Onto bigger and better things! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Wrong. No skin in the game? How about getting paid pretty well to do your job effectively without scratching the airplane? There’s your skin in the game. Go buy some stock if you need more. I’ve worked at places that profit sharing has easily disappeared and turned into a performance bonus that turned out to be nothing if the performance goals weren’t met. |
Originally Posted by Douglas9
(Post 2545891)
Wrong. No skin in the game? How about getting paid pretty well to do your job effectively without scratching the airplane? There’s your skin in the game. Go buy some stock if you need more.
I’ve worked at places that profit sharing has easily disappeared and turned into a performance bonus that turned out to be nothing if the performance goals weren’t met. |
Originally Posted by Douglas9
(Post 2545891)
Wrong. No skin in the game? How about getting paid pretty well to do your job effectively without scratching the airplane? There’s your skin in the game. Go buy some stock if you need more.
I’ve worked at places that profit sharing has easily disappeared and turned into a performance bonus that turned out to be nothing if the performance goals weren’t met. LOL! Well... when you don’t know, you just don’t know. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2545912)
That can’t happen if the formula for calculating the profit sharing is contractually mandated.
Of course management always complies with what’s in the contract. I must have been dreaming when it happened to the pilot group I was working with. |
Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
(Post 2545822)
Ours is 11.3% for last year and is getting paid next week. It’s nice to have a skin in the game....
For now you can use it to offset your ginormous healthcare costs. |
Looks like we have at least one more month of paid transition conflicts.
|
Originally Posted by Flyondawall
(Post 2546076)
Well, let’s see what happens to it during negotiations. For now you can use it to offset your ginormous healthcare costs.
Uh... what? I’m on our Regular Plan and pay exactly $0 in monthly premium, $200 individual deductible or $300 for the family and max out of pocket for the year is $2500. |
Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
(Post 2546083)
Uh... what? I’m on our Regular Plan and pay exactly $0 in monthly premium, $200 individual deductible or $300 for the family and max out of pocket for the year is $2500.
|
[QUOTE=Flyondawall;2545797]
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 2541382)
This ta doesn’t raise the bar for anything, there isn’t one single item in it that’s “industry leading” only reason folks voted for this is because of the bonus they offered (IMO). I do feel for the guys at Frontier and JB as this won’t help them at all, considering we voted in basically JB rates
You are ill informed. No one voted yes to this because of the signing bonus. This was voted yes because this is the best we could get. We were told by the NMB we will never get released to strike. The company never met with the union outside mediation. With what we did get, the company’s profitability will be well below the industry now and the NMB felt that this is as far as they wanted to go without negatively affecting the financial health of Spirit. We got the largest increase in pay in a single contract cycle in ALPA history. So I think the reason we voted yes is because if we didn’t, the NMB was going to ice us for an undetermined amount of time while they went on to Frontier, JB and railroads. Losing $5,000 a month,no scope, no DC, no LTD (own occupation) just to vote no is a very poor financial decision. Most captains in the middle of the pack will have higher career earnings than going anywhere else at this point other than Delta. |
Originally Posted by Gjn290
(Post 2546082)
Looks like we have at least one more month of paid transition conflicts.
|
[QUOTE=lowandslow;2546153]
Originally Posted by Flyondawall
(Post 2545797)
Please just stop posting arguments for this thing. I'm moving on so I'd appreciate it if you do as well. Thank you. |
Originally Posted by Flyondawall
(Post 2546110)
You talking about B6 or SWA?
I’m at SWA. |
Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
(Post 2546200)
I’m at SWA.
|
Originally Posted by Flyondawall
(Post 2546204)
Oh, no wonder the confusion. I just thought you were another B6 guy. My apologies.
No sweat... cheers! |
[QUOTE=Flyondawall;2546183]
Originally Posted by lowandslow
(Post 2546153)
Um, ok. Didn’t realize you were forced to read these posts. If I were here voicing my thoughts on how we were screwed (BTW-Of course it was voted in for the money it sure wasn't to get PBS) I'm pretty sure everyone would say "dude move on, let's work together and make things better." Your repeating of the Yes voter's mantra of "NMB..., best we can do..." sucked before ratification and it sucks now so enjoy your bonus and your not quite industry standard pay and move on. |
Originally Posted by a2cbus
(Post 2546165)
And it looks like pay rates aren’t effective until March 2nd now....
|
[QUOTE=lowandslow;2546220]
Originally Posted by Flyondawall
(Post 2546183)
Great response! If I were here voicing my thoughts on how we were screwed (BTW-Of course it was voted in for the money it sure wasn't to get PBS) I'm pretty sure everyone would say "dude move on, let's work together and make things better." Your repeating of the Yes voter's mantra of "NMB..., best we can do..." sucked before ratification and it sucks now so enjoy your bonus and your not quite industry standard pay and move on. |
Originally Posted by a2cbus
(Post 2546165)
And it looks like pay rates aren’t effective until March 2nd now....
|
[QUOTE=Flyondawall;2546325]
Originally Posted by lowandslow
(Post 2546220)
I’m guessing you were a no vote. Makes perfect sense. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2546329)
Does anyone else have a problem with this? I know I do. We were told in writing that it was March 1st. All of us essentially lose the difference on 1/30th of our February guarantee and those that worked 3/1 lose even more. Some picked up JRM on the 1st because we were told rates were effective then.
|
[QUOTE=lowandslow;2546331]
Originally Posted by Flyondawall
(Post 2546325)
Quite the sleuth. What does my position say under my name? RJS has been openly SWA here for over a month yet you jumped on him/her as a B6 pilot. |
Reference the X and Y list. Which one are you able to say no to once you talk to them?
|
Originally Posted by squawkoff
(Post 2546400)
Reference the X and Y list. Which one are you able to say no to once you talk to them?
|
Originally Posted by YourMom
(Post 2546422)
X. Are you all seeing it on flica?
|
[QUOTE=Flyondawall;2546389]
Originally Posted by lowandslow
(Post 2546331)
Lol, ok buddy. I did apologize to him for the confusion. We were talking about B6 then SWA and I thought he was B6. My admitted error. It doesn’t change the fact that you are the kind of person that likes to constantly complain and be a miserable prick. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2546329)
Does anyone else have a problem with this? I know I do. We were told in writing that it was March 1st. All of us essentially lose the difference on 1/30th of our February guarantee and those that worked 3/1 lose even more. Some picked up JRM on the 1st because we were told rates were effective then.
Yes! I have over 300 problems with it! |
Originally Posted by a2cbus
(Post 2546165)
And it looks like pay rates aren’t effective until March 2nd now....
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2546995)
I will grieve this, we had it in writing, and DOS is the first. I credited 8:25 on the first, so I lose over $600...
|
Be careful what you ask for. Apparently as part of the negotiating that got the Mar 2 pay rate changeover, the company agreed to old transition conflict rules for April and May.
Read the email, see what really happened, and then decide if you've been injured. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2546995)
I will grieve this, we had it in writing, and DOS is the first. I credited 8:25 on the first, so I lose over $600...
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2546995)
I will grieve this, we had it in writing, and DOS is the first. I credited 8:25 on the first, so I lose over $600...
Keep us posted on your fight; it'd be nice to see some accountability. |
Originally Posted by Dukeuno
(Post 2547434)
The grievance will get shot down. ALPA agreed to the March 2nd, and they are also the ones that determine if a grievance will get heard or not. You only other source is outside counsel.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2547506)
I'm not hopeful, but I am mad, and I feel I should at least point out they promised and didn't deliver.
|
What was the ultimate goal/desire of the pilot group for this contract? What was left out that should be fought for in 2023? Is another 2-3 year delay in negotiations likely when the contract becomes amendable?
I get that a bit more pay would have been welcome, but a cursory look at the DOS+4 CA rates show that your new rates are competitive with A319/320 CA rates at the legacy carriers and they destroy the rates at Allegiant, Frontier, and JetBlue (for now). The FO rates lag behind the legacies, but with upgrade potential at 5 years given continued growth, that is a huge difference in total lifetime compensation for an older "initiate" to the 121 world who goes to Spirit early on, given 12-15 year upgrades at the Legacies and timing/age that will prevent ever being a widebody CA. My calculations yield a result of $1 million in favor of going to Spirit after about 3 years at a regional over waiting to flow to American from one of their WO regionals. I'd like to have seen a bump in training pay and a slightly stronger 1st year FO rate, but I can see how retaining a barrier to entry will weed out candidates that aren't serious about a long-term career move to Spirit. Management will always be the thorn in the side of the flight crews, but aside from that is the work enjoyable and are the people good to work with? Is Spirit somewhere you could see yourself finishing your career after the "improvements" in this TA? |
Dear god, please stop.
|
Originally Posted by WhiteMorpheus
(Post 2567450)
What was the ultimate goal/desire of the pilot group for this contract? What was left out that should be fought for in 2023? Is another 2-3 year delay in negotiations likely when the contract becomes amendable?
I get that a bit more pay would have been welcome, but a cursory look at the DOS+4 CA rates show that your new rates are competitive with A319/320 CA rates at the legacy carriers and they destroy the rates at Allegiant, Frontier, and JetBlue (for now). The FO rates lag behind the legacies, but with upgrade potential at 5 years given continued growth, that is a huge difference in total lifetime compensation for an older "initiate" to the 121 world who goes to Spirit early on, given 12-15 year upgrades at the Legacies and timing/age that will prevent ever being a widebody CA. My calculations yield a result of $1 million in favor of going to Spirit after about 3 years at a regional over waiting to flow to American from one of their WO regionals. I'd like to have seen a bump in training pay and a slightly stronger 1st year FO rate, but I can see how retaining a barrier to entry will weed out candidates that aren't serious about a long-term career move to Spirit. Management will always be the thorn in the side of the flight crews, but aside from that is the work enjoyable and are the people good to work with? Is Spirit somewhere you could see yourself finishing your career after the "improvements" in this TA? |
Originally Posted by WhiteMorpheus
(Post 2567450)
What was the ultimate goal/desire of the pilot group for this contract? What was left out that should be fought for in 2023? Is another 2-3 year delay in negotiations likely when the contract becomes amendable?
I get that a bit more pay would have been welcome, but a cursory look at the DOS+4 CA rates show that your new rates are competitive with A319/320 CA rates at the legacy carriers and they destroy the rates at Allegiant, Frontier, and JetBlue (for now). The FO rates lag behind the legacies, but with upgrade potential at 5 years given continued growth, that is a huge difference in total lifetime compensation for an older "initiate" to the 121 world who goes to Spirit early on, given 12-15 year upgrades at the Legacies and timing/age that will prevent ever being a widebody CA. My calculations yield a result of $1 million in favor of going to Spirit after about 3 years at a regional over waiting to flow to American from one of their WO regionals. I'd like to have seen a bump in training pay and a slightly stronger 1st year FO rate, but I can see how retaining a barrier to entry will weed out candidates that aren't serious about a long-term career move to Spirit. Management will always be the thorn in the side of the flight crews, but aside from that is the work enjoyable and are the people good to work with? Is Spirit somewhere you could see yourself finishing your career after the "improvements" in this TA? |
Originally Posted by YourMom
(Post 2567650)
There are many many staying at Spirit for a career. Crews are awesome! Lots of 5 year pilots that don't even have apps in at the others. Lots of negativity on APC but try asking a pilot in person and it won't seem so bad.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:17 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands