Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Training pay, days off, DFW? >

Training pay, days off, DFW?


Notices

Training pay, days off, DFW?

Old 04-01-2018 | 08:06 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal
Newhire pay is a recruiting tool that the company needs to pony up. The MEC doesn't represent people before they're hired, and to negotiate pay for those not on property would be doing a disservice to the pilots they actually represent.
Yea, I heard this one. It's almost as good as the "everyone on property will upgrade in 3 years with the current aircraft order" one.
Reply
Old 04-01-2018 | 10:19 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyjbh
I wouldn’t bash the 91/135 guys as much. I think that’s a bit ignorant to label them as second class. I was both (121/135) before I came to NK and my training was great. Most of the failures come from previous 121.... the one that didn’t make it in our class was 121. I think it boils down to how prepared you are when you show up and how serious you take training. It’s not hard if you study....




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can certainly have poor candidates from all backgrounds, I agree.

The program itself is not great. However, when other airlines were not hiring or hiring very slowly Spirit hired very few corporate pilots because they showed a pattern of having issues with the program. When the other airlines started hiring, Spirit entered the backside of the growth curve, and management showed their colors in negotiations, Spirit hired many corporate pilots and lower time 121 pilots and training failures skyrocketed.

I’m not saying all are bad because many are great but there is a pattern.

I recommended an all 91/135 guy. I gave him all the advice and help if he wanted to be successful in the program. He was shown the door and really never took responsibility for it.
Reply
Old 04-02-2018 | 07:46 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 24
From: Airplanes
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
Guys with a background of customer training MAY have issues. Real deal 135 operators or 91k? Hardly.
Straight from our CP's mouth: corporate guys have the highest failure rate of all new hires.
Reply
Old 04-03-2018 | 02:40 AM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Macjet
Straight from our CP's mouth: corporate guys have the highest failure rate of all new hires.
You’re mixing the two liberally. There’s vendor training and small 91 operators/ corporate flight departments, and then there are guys who fly in very structured 135/91k environs with excellent in house training and procedures.

I’m sorry, the Spirit training program is difficult because it is condensed and has very few sims. It is not difficult because of the material covered.
Reply
Old 04-03-2018 | 08:42 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
You’re mixing the two liberally. There’s vendor training and small 91 operators/ corporate flight departments, and then there are guys who fly in very structured 135/91k environs with excellent in house training and procedures.

I’m sorry, the Spirit training program is difficult because it is condensed and has very few sims. It is not difficult because of the material covered.
That’s why they struggle. Of course it’s not the material. Most corporate pilots are used to a relaxed pace with little consequence.
Reply
Old 04-03-2018 | 08:50 AM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 24
From: Airplanes
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
You’re mixing the two liberally. There’s vendor training and small 91 operators/ corporate flight departments, and then there are guys who fly in very structured 135/91k environs with excellent in house training and procedures.

I’m sorry, the Spirit training program is difficult because it is condensed and has very few sims. It is not difficult because of the material covered.
You're telling me nothing bro. I'm former 91, 91k, 135, and I was a TCE for a large 142 training company. The deficiencies of the above are vast.
Reply
Old 04-03-2018 | 09:59 AM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

And I was a check pilot for a large 135/91k operator. I’m not worried about any of my former colleagues coming here and struggling with the training. No one was taking 50 minute coffee breaks there, and you had better know your stuff in the oral, in the sim, on the line and during line checks. Frankly, that training is among the best I’ve been through, and that’s a common refrain for former coworkers who’ve moved on to the 121 world at all manner of operators.

121 isn’t special. It sure as heck isn’t hard. Spirit’s training is difficult because of its footprint, but pilots coming here with a history of non-vendor training won’t have a problem. Ones who flew 100 hours a year with a nodding acquaintance with flows and procedures might.

Flows, memory items/limitations and familiarity with normal procedures isn’t some majic dope reserved for the airlines. In fact, the burden is considerably less now that you don’t have to deal with all the ancillary stuff that large corporate operators consider common.
Reply
Old 04-03-2018 | 10:01 AM
  #48  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 24
From: Airplanes
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
And I was a check pilot for a large 135/91k operator. I’m not worried about any of my former colleagues coming here and struggling with the training. No one was taking 50 minute coffee breaks there, and you had better know your stuff in the oral, in the sim, on the line and during line checks. Frankly, that training is among the best I’ve been through, and that’s a common refrain for former coworkers who’ve moved on to the 121 world at all manner of operators.

121 isn’t special. It sure as heck isn’t hard. Spirit’s training is difficult because of its footprint, but pilots coming here with a history of non-vendor training won’t have a problem. Ones who flew 100 hours a year with a nodding acquaintance with flows and procedures might.

Flows, memory items/limitations and familiarity with normal procedures isn’t some majic dope reserved for the airlines. In fact, the burden is considerably less now that you don’t have to deal with all the ancillary stuff that large corporate operators consider common.
I don't disagree. But the fact remains that our 91/135 hires have the highest failure rate of all new hires. Period. So, if a guy or gal is coming from that background then they had better show day 1 with their **** together.
Reply
Old 04-03-2018 | 10:06 AM
  #49  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Macjet
I don't disagree. But the fact remains that our 91/135 hires have the highest failure rate of all new hires. Period. So, if a guy or gal is coming from that background then they had better show day 1 with their **** together.
Again, you’re mixing them liberally.

Everyone better show up with their ******* together. That’s called professionalism and being ready for training. Guys being coddled in the vendor process probably need to up their game, but not all. I’d love to see the failure rate of NJ/FJ etc. vs those of Mom and Pop’s Jet Charter, Hair Care and Tire Center. Because to my knowledge my former colleagues are batting .1000.
Reply
Old 04-03-2018 | 03:03 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 24
From: Airplanes
Default

Originally Posted by FNGFO
Again, you’re mixing them liberally.

Everyone better show up with their ******* together. That’s called professionalism and being ready for training. Guys being coddled in the vendor process probably need to up their game, but not all. I’d love to see the failure rate of NJ/FJ etc. vs those of Mom and Pop’s Jet Charter, Hair Care and Tire Center. Because to my knowledge my former colleagues are batting .1000.
Either 135/91 guys suck as aviators or their previous training hasn't prepared them for the airline world. My bet in on the latter. But the fact remains that they don't do as well. And, right or wrong, that weighs heavily with our recruitment team.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sink r8
Delta
42
08-19-2016 01:09 PM
BTDTB4
Major
29
02-14-2012 12:27 PM
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
Pinchanickled
Regional
11
12-21-2010 03:58 PM
iflyatnite
Cargo
75
05-03-2010 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices