Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Spirit
SPA union doesn’t care about seniority >

SPA union doesn’t care about seniority

Search
Notices

SPA union doesn’t care about seniority

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2019, 10:10 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 211
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSideUp85 View Post
We were taught visual approaches?
You got to this point- and you don’t know how to fly a visual approach?

I imagine there’s a TON of private-pilot stuff that “we weren’t taught...” here at a MAJOR AIRLINE...

Last edited by SG1159; 08-20-2019 at 10:25 PM.
SG1159 is offline  
Old 08-21-2019, 04:48 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 924
Default

I think the reason it's suddenly become a major issue is that combined with the September pullback and PBS it created the perfect storm that wreaked havoc on schedules across the system. The most junior lineholder FO anywhere in the system was around a March 18 hire. The number of FOs on reserve more than doubled in almost every base. This would not have happened even with the September pullback if the trips were not withheld.

This is something the pilot group needs to make clear is a central issue for the next round of negotiations. The company withholding-for-training clause disappears. Check airmen bid their seniority within PBS. If they are bidding for training in that given month, their trips are then bought away from their lineholding FOs when needed. End of story.

Our committees are unlikely to make this a priority because, as previously mentioned, the current system directly benefits many of them.
Flightcap is offline  
Old 08-21-2019, 06:19 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by Omniscient View Post
Exactly

“It's like Lenin said, you look for the person who will benefit... And, uh... You know, you'll, uh... You know what I mean...”
“I am the walrus?”
FollowMe is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 11:55 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

How do you propose we change the system that allows check airman to bid outside seniority and beat EVERY CAPTAIN that isnt a CKA to trips?


They have an LEC Now. its too late.
elmetal is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 12:55 PM
  #55  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post
How do you propose we change the system that allows check airman to bid outside seniority and beat EVERY CAPTAIN that isnt a CKA to trips?


They have an LEC Now. its too late.
Have the CKA bid the same as regular captains, designate their awarded trips training trips, and pull those from the FO trip pool (just like the trips are pulled for no-fly-list-trips). Having PBS makes this easy, FO awards are out a day later already anyway.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 01:17 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: CA
Posts: 299
Default

I agree. I’m a LCKA and not a fan of our bidding system. Personally I would like to PBS bid trips with my specifications and have scheduling buy out my FO. Easy and done!
Originally Posted by symbian simian View Post
Have the CKA bid the same as regular captains, designate their awarded trips training trips, and pull those from the FO trip pool (just like the trips are pulled for no-fly-list-trips). Having PBS makes this easy, FO awards are out a day later already anyway.
ropestart is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 01:44 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
elmetal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

the real is answer is your suggestion except leave pairings for FOs to then be bought off. Of course they won't do that.

What I meant was now the CKA have an LEC and a bigger voice, how do you propose we convince our own union that we should throw check airmen back into real bidding? I agree with you, this is exactly why PBS can be amazing and we're not utilizing the damn system.
elmetal is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 04:02 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ed Force One's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 707
Default

Originally Posted by FollowMe View Post
“I am the walrus?”
Shut the F up Donnie!
Ed Force One is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 05:32 PM
  #59  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal View Post
the real is answer is your suggestion except leave pairings for FOs to then be bought off. Of course they won't do that.

What I meant was now the CKA have an LEC and a bigger voice, how do you propose we convince our own union that we should throw check airmen back into real bidding? I agree with you, this is exactly why PBS can be amazing and we're not utilizing the damn system.
Of course getting FO trips bought would be better, but it would be better than current contract to a degree management would want a quid (to use a loaded word) for. As far as the union, every LEC should get one vote, and every LEC not representing the LCA damn well better vote in the interest of the line pilots.
Getting the company to agree will never be easy because the don't want to be helpful even if it is their own interest.
symbian simian is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 05:54 PM
  #60  
Line Holder
 
Capt Ruby Pubes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Position: I got a sick vendetta to get that chedda
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One View Post
Shut the F up Donnie!
Smokey this isn't Nom, this is bowling there are rules.
Capt Ruby Pubes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
APC225
United
1
02-23-2019 05:16 AM
jsled
United
240
05-23-2017 07:24 PM
lovellrt
SkyWest
15181
02-25-2016 05:47 PM
Turbanpilot
American
1446
12-24-2014 05:31 PM
TruthHurts
United
57
03-22-2012 10:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices