![]() |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2910771)
It wouldn’t be a “fill in the gap left by the grounded MAX’s” move. It would be a fleet diversification to limit the exposure to any future such issues move. With a dollop of picking off a competitor on top, and a few sprinkles of 321LXR that will do what a MAX10 cannot.
|
After today's announcement a lot of you are wrong! Way off! No Boeings. If it's a Boeing I'm not going!
|
Originally Posted by YourMom
(Post 2911384)
After today's announcement a lot of you are wrong! Way off! No Boeings. If it's a Boeing I'm not going!
|
Never happen...DoJ will never allow it. Consumer protection laws will never allow it.
|
Originally Posted by MO4SHO
(Post 2914760)
Never happen...DoJ will never allow it. Consumer protection laws will never allow it.
|
Originally Posted by MO4SHO
(Post 2914760)
Never happen...DoJ will never allow it. Consumer protection laws will never allow it.
They'll allow anything for the right money in their pockets don't kid yourself |
They'll allow anything for the right money in their pockets don't kid yourself[/QUOTE]
Exactly..... |
When was the last time the DOJ blocked a merger?
|
If folks at the tippy top project money will fill their pockets; they force those with approval stamps to pick them up and slam them down.
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 2915163)
When was the last time the DOJ blocked a merger?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands