Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3058192)
Professors are as weird as they come. I have a few that live in my neighborhood. Every HOA meeting they make stupid liberal comments. It’s like there just pandering to impress people.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3058231)
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...s-in-disgrace/
The PhD that destroyed the world economy and the chica that forced his resignation: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...igns-breaking/ Plane Coffee |
Originally Posted by galleycafe
(Post 3058197)
It's very important for academics to parrot each other properly and never challenge each other's 'findings'.
That way they can keep their government subsidized gravy train rolling. Plane Coffee |
Originally Posted by Dised101
(Post 3058245)
As a Ph.D. and an airline pilot, I would remind all my colleagues of the old saying, “it is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”
It was refreshing. Plane Coffee |
I remember when I was younger my grandpa saying that the college degrees were:
BS- Bull Sh-t MS- More Sh-t PhD- Piled High and Deep We always just laughed and thought he was a little bit crazy, but as I get older I realize more and more that he may have actually been on to something. |
Originally Posted by SAABoroowski
(Post 3058238)
Originally Posted by Halon1211 View Post Professors are as weird as they come. I have a few that live in my neighborhood. Every HOA meeting they make stupid liberal comments. It’s like there just pandering to impress people. this is the most accurate thing I may have ever read on APC, lol. Nailed it ;) |
What a joke. That original model assumed 2-3 million deaths if we did nothing. Reality is, we as a population wouldn't have done nothing. We could have simply worn masks, been more careful with hand washing, not touching the face, and social distancing to the extent practicaly, and that 2-3 millin death number goes out the window. Instead, we used his model and shut down an economy of trillions.
I really hope when this is all said, done, and over, that there is a major investigative report that looks at the virus, its origination, and how WE reacted to it. Far too many people will look back and say "see we made a difference it was only 400k dead instead of 2-3 million." The question that needs to be answered is if that model was really accurate to begin with and how many deaths would we have had if we just let simple practices take place (in previous paragraph) and kept the economy open, except maybe the epicenter hotspot like NYC. Shutting the economy has other consequences. Police across the country have reported they have far less child abuse calls. Many of them come from schools and daycare centers. With those closed, kids are still being abused, but now not being reported. Doctors in the ER are concerned the stroke and heart patients have stopped coming. These people will die soon since their fear of Covid19 kept them home and didn't address their heart/brain condition. And once they die, it'll probably be counted as a Covid death. It's all gotten so out of hand. Virus deaths aren't even virus deaths but still being counted as such. OTOH, you have real risks and lives in danger that aren't getting help because of the fear response to Covid. |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3058568)
What a joke. That original model assumed 2-3 million deaths if we did nothing. Reality is, we as a population wouldn't have done nothing. We could have simply worn masks, been more careful with hand washing, not touching the face, and social distancing to the extent practicaly, and that 2-3 millin death number goes out the window. Instead, we used his model and shut down an economy of trillions.
I really hope when this is all said, done, and over, that there is a major investigative report that looks at the virus, its origination, and how WE reacted to it. Far too many people will look back and say "see we made a difference it was only 400k dead instead of 2-3 million." The question that needs to be answered is if that model was really accurate to begin with and how many deaths would we have had if we just let simple practices take place (in previous paragraph) and kept the economy open, except maybe the epicenter hotspot like NYC. Shutting the economy has other consequences. Police across the country have reported they have far less child abuse calls. Many of them come from schools and daycare centers. With those closed, kids are still being abused, but now not being reported. Doctors in the ER are concerned the stroke and heart patients have stopped coming. These people will die soon since their fear of Covid19 kept them home and didn't address their heart/brain condition. And once they die, it'll probably be counted as a Covid death. It's all gotten so out of hand. Virus deaths aren't even virus deaths but still being counted as such. OTOH, you have real risks and lives in danger that aren't getting help because of the fear response to Covid. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...navirus-deaths this has nothing to do with safety. |
What the heck it OTOH now?
|
Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
(Post 3058859)
six. Six pure covid deaths.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...navirus-deaths this has nothing to do with safety. Arguing that we should only count 6 of those deaths in San Diego is incredibly disingenuous. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3059544)
If you have diabetes and get run over by a bus, its the bus that killed you.
Arguing that we should only count 6 of those deaths in San Diego is incredibly disingenuous. having diabetes, obesity, heart disease, COPD etc is proven to exacerbate covid. |
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3059589)
that’s apples to oranges. Having diabetes doesn’t exacerbate a bus. Making a comparison like that is disingenuous
having diabetes, obesity, heart disease, COPD etc is proven to exacerbate covid. Plane Coffee |
Obviously preexisting conditions exacerbate covid.
Pretending that only 6 people died of Covid is just ridiculous. Go talk to the family member of someone who has died of Covid and tell them about your little theory. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3059544)
If you have diabetes and get run over by a bus, its the bus that killed you.
Arguing that we should only count 6 of those deaths in San Diego is incredibly disingenuous. 'Excess deaths' will be telling. In18 months; the difference between statically expected deaths and absolute deaths will paint a clearer picture of the diseases true impact to society. There is strong indication that Covid has been hastening the demise of the weak; and that will be reflected in excess deaths. If less people die than expected in 6 months, because they we're 'cleared out' by covid, those numbers will be captured. We'll likely see that Covid caused a huge number of 'early deaths', but the expected deaths won't be nearly as high. Obviously; any 'early death' hastened by the disease is tragic, and any definition of 'early' is subjective, biology & statistics are science. |
Originally Posted by Punkah Louvre
(Post 3059666)
<snip> Obviously; any 'early death' hastened by the disease is tragic, and any definition of 'early' is subjective, biology & statistics are science.
Not necessarily! I saw my mother die of complications from decades of diabetes. The last couple years were horrendous, and the last few months were in and out of ICUs. It was my own mother - and if she had died of Corona - I would have been livid - because I was emotionally vested. However, rationally, looking back, hindsight, Monday morning etc. - It may have been a kinder outcome. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3059635)
Obviously preexisting conditions exacerbate covid.
Pretending that only 6 people died of Covid is just ridiculous. Go talk to the family member of someone who has died of Covid and tell them about your little theory. Did they all get hit by a bus? Plane Coffee |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3059544)
If you have diabetes and get run over by a bus, its the bus that killed you.
Arguing that we should only count 6 of those deaths in San Diego is incredibly disingenuous. Out of 333 million Americans there are an awful lot that are walking around with one foot in the grave and the other on a cake of soap. No possible societal actions we could do can keep these people alive very long. |
Originally Posted by Punkah Louvre
(Post 3059666)
There will never be a true consensus over how many people in the US have died of Covid. The reporting standards aren't strict or prescriptive enough and different organizations define cause of death in different ways.This is one of the downsides of a sprawling privatized and Balkanized heath care system.
'Excess deaths' will be telling. In18 months; the difference between statically expected deaths and absolute deaths will paint a clearer picture of the diseases true impact to society. There is strong indication that Covid has been hastening the demise of the weak; and that will be reflected in excess deaths. If less people die than expected in 6 months, because they we're 'cleared out' by covid, those numbers will be captured. We'll likely see that Covid caused a huge number of 'early deaths', but the expected deaths won't be nearly as high. Obviously; any 'early death' hastened by the disease is tragic, and any definition of 'early' is subjective, biology & statistics are science. |
Originally Posted by spirited
(Post 3059712)
NOT PC - skip this post if you need Politically correct statements
Not necessarily! I saw my mother die of complications from decades of diabetes. The last couple years were horrendous, and the last few months were in and out of ICUs. It was my own mother - and if she had died of Corona - I would have been livid - because I was emotionally vested. However, rationally, looking back, hindsight, Monday morning etc. - It may have been a kinder outcome. |
Everyone’s so worried about deciding who died of covid that you missed the good news. We’re going to be running 80 flights a day now instead of 50! For those bad at math we need to be running around 375 a day to just “only” furlough half our pilots come October.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3060010)
Everyone’s so worried about deciding who died of covid that you missed the good news. We’re going to be running 80 flights a day now instead of 50! For those bad at math we need to be running around 375 a day to just “only” furlough half our pilots come October.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3060166)
Outsider of course, has Spirit said anything yet? Eg, any displacement bid, vacancy, etc?
|
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3060010)
Everyone’s so worried about deciding who died of covid that you missed the good news. We’re going to be running 80 flights a day now instead of 50! For those bad at math we need to be running around 375 a day to just “only” furlough half our pilots come October.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk umm yeah it doesn’t work that way... |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 3060254)
umm yeah it doesn’t work that way...
Very true my numbers are no doubt off, my point was everyone should be concerned about what’s going on here. Sure we increased to 80 flights a day but that’s not enough flights to keep most of us employed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3060377)
Very true my numbers are no doubt off, my point was everyone should be concerned about what’s going on here. Sure we increased to 80 flights a day but that’s not enough flights to keep most of us employed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by onedolla
(Post 3060380)
Or more importantly, the airline in business for long.
Very good point. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3060377)
Very true my numbers are no doubt off, my point was everyone should be concerned about what’s going on here. Sure we increased to 80 flights a day but that’s not enough flights to keep most of us employed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by onedolla
(Post 3060380)
Or more importantly, the airline in business for long.
|
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
(Post 3060616)
Agreed. I’d rather be furloughed for years than have this place going under, or have the pilot group taking concessions if you ask me.
|
Five weeks post-bottom, 22% average weekly throughput growth. Did not solve for the probability of continuing averages, only averages. With current 22% weekly passenger growth, industry will hit 50% of 2019 sometime in mid to late July, this is of course barring any major negative disease trends. Given the lack of international flights for the foreseeable future, i wonder how far these numbers can actually go, and will the numbers skew more heavily toward WN and NK initially?
|
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 3060758)
Five weeks post-bottom, 22% average weekly throughput growth. Did not solve for the probability of continuing averages, only averages. With current 22% weekly passenger growth, industry will hit 50% of 2019 sometime in mid to late July, this is of course barring any major negative disease trends. Given the lack of international flights for the foreseeable future, i wonder how far these numbers can actually go, and will the numbers skew more heavily toward WN and NK initially?
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 3060890)
what percentage of our 700 ish flights are international
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 3060890)
what percentage of our 700 ish flights are international
|
Man it’s a shame reserves can’t participate in daily open time.
|
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
(Post 3061173)
Man it’s a shame reserves can’t participate in daily open time.
Oooops.🤣 |
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
(Post 3061173)
Man it’s a shame reserves can’t participate in daily open time.
I’ve been saying since this all went down that the MOUs should have allowed reserves to drop and pick up open time. For the Orlando reserve grid on the CA side the lowest day of net reserves is 62. No reason they shouldn’t be able to drop. |
Originally Posted by TrojanCMH
(Post 3061325)
I’ve been saying since this all went down that the MOUs should have allowed reserves to drop and pick up open time. For the Orlando reserve grid on the CA side the lowest day of net reserves is 62. No reason they shouldn’t be able to drop.
There's no reason in having a CBA if we're going to amend it every month. |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3061351)
Of course there's a reason, and 70% of the pilot group approved of it.
There's no reason in having a CBA if we're going to amend it every month. This is a once in a hundred years event, hardly an “every month” type of MOU. |
Originally Posted by putzin
(Post 3061177)
Most thought they'd never be back on reserve.
Oooops.🤣 |
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
(Post 3061173)
Man it’s a shame reserves can’t participate in daily open time.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands