Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Spirit (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/spirit/)
-   -   Earnings call (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/spirit/129492-earnings-call.html)

SAABoroowski 05-17-2020 10:55 AM


Originally Posted by Halon1211 (Post 3058192)
Professors are as weird as they come. I have a few that live in my neighborhood. Every HOA meeting they make stupid liberal comments. It’s like there just pandering to impress people.

this is the most accurate thing I may have ever read on APC, lol. Nailed it

galleycafe 05-17-2020 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by Excargodog (Post 3058231)
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...s-in-disgrace/

The PhD that destroyed the world economy

and the chica that forced his resignation:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...igns-breaking/

There are always outliers.

Plane Coffee

Dised101 05-17-2020 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by galleycafe (Post 3058197)
It's very important for academics to parrot each other properly and never challenge each other's 'findings'.

That way they can keep their government subsidized gravy train rolling.

Plane Coffee

As a Ph.D. and an airline pilot, I would remind all my colleagues of the old saying, “it is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

galleycafe 05-17-2020 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by Dised101 (Post 3058245)
As a Ph.D. and an airline pilot, I would remind all my colleagues of the old saying, “it is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

I think I took a class from you.

It was refreshing.

Plane Coffee

turbojet28 05-17-2020 03:47 PM

I remember when I was younger my grandpa saying that the college degrees were:

BS- Bull Sh-t
MS- More Sh-t
PhD- Piled High and Deep

We always just laughed and thought he was a little bit crazy, but as I get older I realize more and more that he may have actually been on to something.

Ed Force One 05-17-2020 08:17 PM


Originally Posted by SAABoroowski (Post 3058238)

Originally Posted by Halon1211 View Post
Professors are as weird as they come. I have a few that live in my neighborhood. Every HOA meeting they make stupid liberal comments. It’s like there just pandering to impress people.

this is the most accurate thing I may have ever read on APC, lol. Nailed it

Except for the "There" part, you mean?

;)

ShyGuy 05-17-2020 10:57 PM

What a joke. That original model assumed 2-3 million deaths if we did nothing. Reality is, we as a population wouldn't have done nothing. We could have simply worn masks, been more careful with hand washing, not touching the face, and social distancing to the extent practicaly, and that 2-3 millin death number goes out the window. Instead, we used his model and shut down an economy of trillions.

I really hope when this is all said, done, and over, that there is a major investigative report that looks at the virus, its origination, and how WE reacted to it. Far too many people will look back and say "see we made a difference it was only 400k dead instead of 2-3 million." The question that needs to be answered is if that model was really accurate to begin with and how many deaths would we have had if we just let simple practices take place (in previous paragraph) and kept the economy open, except maybe the epicenter hotspot like NYC.

Shutting the economy has other consequences. Police across the country have reported they have far less child abuse calls. Many of them come from schools and daycare centers. With those closed, kids are still being abused, but now not being reported. Doctors in the ER are concerned the stroke and heart patients have stopped coming. These people will die soon since their fear of Covid19 kept them home and didn't address their heart/brain condition. And once they die, it'll probably be counted as a Covid death.

It's all gotten so out of hand. Virus deaths aren't even virus deaths but still being counted as such. OTOH, you have real risks and lives in danger that aren't getting help because of the fear response to Covid.

CaptCoolHand 05-18-2020 08:41 AM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 3058568)
What a joke. That original model assumed 2-3 million deaths if we did nothing. Reality is, we as a population wouldn't have done nothing. We could have simply worn masks, been more careful with hand washing, not touching the face, and social distancing to the extent practicaly, and that 2-3 millin death number goes out the window. Instead, we used his model and shut down an economy of trillions.

I really hope when this is all said, done, and over, that there is a major investigative report that looks at the virus, its origination, and how WE reacted to it. Far too many people will look back and say "see we made a difference it was only 400k dead instead of 2-3 million." The question that needs to be answered is if that model was really accurate to begin with and how many deaths would we have had if we just let simple practices take place (in previous paragraph) and kept the economy open, except maybe the epicenter hotspot like NYC.

Shutting the economy has other consequences. Police across the country have reported they have far less child abuse calls. Many of them come from schools and daycare centers. With those closed, kids are still being abused, but now not being reported. Doctors in the ER are concerned the stroke and heart patients have stopped coming. These people will die soon since their fear of Covid19 kept them home and didn't address their heart/brain condition. And once they die, it'll probably be counted as a Covid death.

It's all gotten so out of hand. Virus deaths aren't even virus deaths but still being counted as such. OTOH, you have real risks and lives in danger that aren't getting help because of the fear response to Covid.

six. Six pure covid deaths.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...navirus-deaths

this has nothing to do with safety.

ASAPsafetyGUY 05-18-2020 10:09 AM

What the heck it OTOH now?

Aero1900 05-19-2020 06:11 AM


Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand (Post 3058859)
six. Six pure covid deaths.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...navirus-deaths

this has nothing to do with safety.

If you have diabetes and get run over by a bus, its the bus that killed you.

Arguing that we should only count 6 of those deaths in San Diego is incredibly disingenuous.

CLE to IAH 05-19-2020 06:50 AM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 3059544)
If you have diabetes and get run over by a bus, its the bus that killed you.

Arguing that we should only count 6 of those deaths in San Diego is incredibly disingenuous.

that’s apples to oranges. Having diabetes doesn’t exacerbate a bus. Making a comparison like that is disingenuous

having diabetes, obesity, heart disease, COPD etc is proven to exacerbate covid.

galleycafe 05-19-2020 07:18 AM


Originally Posted by CLE to IAH (Post 3059589)
that’s apples to oranges. Having diabetes doesn’t exacerbate a bus. Making a comparison like that is disingenuous

having diabetes, obesity, heart disease, COPD etc is proven to exacerbate covid.

You stop that rationality, now! This is a cauldron for panic, hysteria, and conspiracies ONLY!

Plane Coffee

Aero1900 05-19-2020 07:26 AM

Obviously preexisting conditions exacerbate covid.

Pretending that only 6 people died of Covid is just ridiculous. Go talk to the family member of someone who has died of Covid and tell them about your little theory.

Punkah Louvre 05-19-2020 08:04 AM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 3059544)
If you have diabetes and get run over by a bus, its the bus that killed you.

Arguing that we should only count 6 of those deaths in San Diego is incredibly disingenuous.

There will never be a true consensus over how many people in the US have died of Covid. The reporting standards aren't strict or prescriptive enough and different organizations define cause of death in different ways.This is one of the downsides of a sprawling privatized and Balkanized heath care system.
'Excess deaths' will be telling. In18 months; the difference between statically expected deaths and absolute deaths will paint a clearer picture of the diseases true impact to society.
There is strong indication that Covid has been hastening the demise of the weak; and that will be reflected in excess deaths.
If less people die than expected in 6 months, because they we're 'cleared out' by covid, those numbers will be captured.
We'll likely see that Covid caused a huge number of 'early deaths', but the expected deaths won't be nearly as high.
Obviously; any 'early death' hastened by the disease is tragic, and any definition of 'early' is subjective, biology & statistics are science.

spirited 05-19-2020 08:50 AM


Originally Posted by Punkah Louvre (Post 3059666)
<snip> Obviously; any 'early death' hastened by the disease is tragic, and any definition of 'early' is subjective, biology & statistics are science.

NOT PC - skip this post if you need Politically correct statements

Not necessarily! I saw my mother die of complications from decades of diabetes. The last couple years were horrendous, and the last few months were in and out of ICUs. It was my own mother - and if she had died of Corona - I would have been livid - because I was emotionally vested. However, rationally, looking back, hindsight, Monday morning etc. - It may have been a kinder outcome.

galleycafe 05-19-2020 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 3059635)
Obviously preexisting conditions exacerbate covid.

Pretending that only 6 people died of Covid is just ridiculous. Go talk to the family member of someone who has died of Covid and tell them about your little theory.


Did they all get hit by a bus?

Plane Coffee

Excargodog 05-19-2020 09:13 AM


Originally Posted by Aero1900 (Post 3059544)
If you have diabetes and get run over by a bus, its the bus that killed you.

Arguing that we should only count 6 of those deaths in San Diego is incredibly disingenuous.

On the other hand, if someone had stage four pancreatic cancer with liver, lung, and brain metastases , and caught a cold and died, blaming it on the cold wouldn’t exactly be reasonable either.

Out of 333 million Americans there are an awful lot that are walking around with one foot in the grave and the other on a cake of soap. No possible societal actions we could do can keep these people alive very long.

ShyGuy 05-19-2020 01:57 PM


Originally Posted by Punkah Louvre (Post 3059666)
There will never be a true consensus over how many people in the US have died of Covid. The reporting standards aren't strict or prescriptive enough and different organizations define cause of death in different ways.This is one of the downsides of a sprawling privatized and Balkanized heath care system.
'Excess deaths' will be telling. In18 months; the difference between statically expected deaths and absolute deaths will paint a clearer picture of the diseases true impact to society.
There is strong indication that Covid has been hastening the demise of the weak; and that will be reflected in excess deaths.
If less people die than expected in 6 months, because they we're 'cleared out' by covid, those numbers will be captured.
We'll likely see that Covid caused a huge number of 'early deaths', but the expected deaths won't be nearly as high.
Obviously; any 'early death' hastened by the disease is tragic, and any definition of 'early' is subjective, biology & statistics are science.

I fully expect that if Biden wins Nov 3rd, the media will change the way they cover Covid19. And even moreso after inauguration.

Punkah Louvre 05-19-2020 02:28 PM


Originally Posted by spirited (Post 3059712)
NOT PC - skip this post if you need Politically correct statements

Not necessarily! I saw my mother die of complications from decades of diabetes. The last couple years were horrendous, and the last few months were in and out of ICUs. It was my own mother - and if she had died of Corona - I would have been livid - because I was emotionally vested. However, rationally, looking back, hindsight, Monday morning etc. - It may have been a kinder outcome.

I'm sorry for the difficult time both of you clearly had. Frankly your experience goes towards a voluntary death option. But I'm European we have that discussion in public.... I certainly wound want suffer like that..

flyingpuma1 05-19-2020 04:38 PM

Everyone’s so worried about deciding who died of covid that you missed the good news. We’re going to be running 80 flights a day now instead of 50! For those bad at math we need to be running around 375 a day to just “only” furlough half our pilots come October.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ShyGuy 05-19-2020 08:49 PM


Originally Posted by flyingpuma1 (Post 3060010)
Everyone’s so worried about deciding who died of covid that you missed the good news. We’re going to be running 80 flights a day now instead of 50! For those bad at math we need to be running around 375 a day to just “only” furlough half our pilots come October.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Outsider of course, has Spirit said anything yet? Eg, any displacement bid, vacancy, etc?

Silver02ex 05-19-2020 09:08 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 3060166)
Outsider of course, has Spirit said anything yet? Eg, any displacement bid, vacancy, etc?

Based on the last flight ops town hall, aircraft are being rotated from being parked and operating, with nothing in long term storage. We will defer some orders next year. I don't think we will find out if there will be displacements until July-August. The latest vacancy is only for those in training or have upcoming class dates. I'm not going to speculate, since it's too early to tell what will happen in the next few months with the demands of travel.

MCDUmanipulator 05-20-2020 05:34 AM


Originally Posted by flyingpuma1 (Post 3060010)
Everyone’s so worried about deciding who died of covid that you missed the good news. We’re going to be running 80 flights a day now instead of 50! For those bad at math we need to be running around 375 a day to just “only” furlough half our pilots come October.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


umm yeah it doesn’t work that way...

flyingpuma1 05-20-2020 07:51 AM


Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator (Post 3060254)
umm yeah it doesn’t work that way...


Very true my numbers are no doubt off, my point was everyone should be concerned about what’s going on here. Sure we increased to 80 flights a day but that’s not enough flights to keep most of us employed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

onedolla 05-20-2020 07:58 AM


Originally Posted by flyingpuma1 (Post 3060377)
Very true my numbers are no doubt off, my point was everyone should be concerned about what’s going on here. Sure we increased to 80 flights a day but that’s not enough flights to keep most of us employed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or more importantly, the airline in business for long.

flyingpuma1 05-20-2020 08:20 AM


Originally Posted by onedolla (Post 3060380)
Or more importantly, the airline in business for long.


Very good point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Meep 05-20-2020 08:43 AM


Originally Posted by flyingpuma1 (Post 3060377)
Very true my numbers are no doubt off, my point was everyone should be concerned about what’s going on here. Sure we increased to 80 flights a day but that’s not enough flights to keep most of us employed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t think anyone disagrees with you. But, increasing flights is a step in the right direction. We’re not magically going to go from 50-700 in a single month. It will be a gradual thing, hopefully we’ll see demand keep increasing and have a bigger increase in July/August.

Slowhawk 05-20-2020 01:10 PM


Originally Posted by onedolla (Post 3060380)
Or more importantly, the airline in business for long.

Agreed. I’d rather be furloughed for years than have this place going under, or have the pilot group taking concessions if you ask me.

flyingpuma1 05-20-2020 01:15 PM


Originally Posted by Slowhawk (Post 3060616)
Agreed. I’d rather be furloughed for years than have this place going under, or have the pilot group taking concessions if you ask me.

Absolutely agree

DrSteveBrule 05-20-2020 04:47 PM

Five weeks post-bottom, 22% average weekly throughput growth. Did not solve for the probability of continuing averages, only averages. With current 22% weekly passenger growth, industry will hit 50% of 2019 sometime in mid to late July, this is of course barring any major negative disease trends. Given the lack of international flights for the foreseeable future, i wonder how far these numbers can actually go, and will the numbers skew more heavily toward WN and NK initially?

Qotsaautopilot 05-20-2020 07:40 PM


Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule (Post 3060758)
Five weeks post-bottom, 22% average weekly throughput growth. Did not solve for the probability of continuing averages, only averages. With current 22% weekly passenger growth, industry will hit 50% of 2019 sometime in mid to late July, this is of course barring any major negative disease trends. Given the lack of international flights for the foreseeable future, i wonder how far these numbers can actually go, and will the numbers skew more heavily toward WN and NK initially?

what percentage of our 700 ish flights are international

FNGFO 05-20-2020 07:58 PM


Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot (Post 3060890)
what percentage of our 700 ish flights are international

15ish.........

Silver02ex 05-20-2020 07:58 PM


Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot (Post 3060890)
what percentage of our 700 ish flights are international

during the flight ops town hall. I thought i heard it was 15%

Slowhawk 05-21-2020 08:30 AM

Man it’s a shame reserves can’t participate in daily open time.

putzin 05-21-2020 08:35 AM


Originally Posted by Slowhawk (Post 3061173)
Man it’s a shame reserves can’t participate in daily open time.

Most thought they'd never be back on reserve.

Oooops.🤣

TrojanCMH 05-21-2020 11:41 AM


Originally Posted by Slowhawk (Post 3061173)
Man it’s a shame reserves can’t participate in daily open time.


I’ve been saying since this all went down that the MOUs should have allowed reserves to drop and pick up open time. For the Orlando reserve grid on the CA side the lowest day of net reserves is 62. No reason they shouldn’t be able to drop.

SSlow 05-21-2020 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by TrojanCMH (Post 3061325)
I’ve been saying since this all went down that the MOUs should have allowed reserves to drop and pick up open time. For the Orlando reserve grid on the CA side the lowest day of net reserves is 62. No reason they shouldn’t be able to drop.

Of course there's a reason, and 70% of the pilot group approved of it.

There's no reason in having a CBA if we're going to amend it every month.

gringo 05-21-2020 02:17 PM


Originally Posted by SSlow (Post 3061351)
Of course there's a reason, and 70% of the pilot group approved of it.

There's no reason in having a CBA if we're going to amend it every month.

We’re not amending the CBA “every month” we’re amending it one time to make sense of this nonsense where 13 out of 250+ get to hold lines and everyone else has no opportunity to make extra money whatsoever, even if they do manage to fly...

This is a once in a hundred years event, hardly an “every month” type of MOU.

MCDUmanipulator 05-21-2020 02:22 PM


Originally Posted by putzin (Post 3061177)
Most thought they'd never be back on reserve.

Oooops.🤣

winner winner chicken dinner.

Meep 05-21-2020 02:26 PM


Originally Posted by Slowhawk (Post 3061173)
Man it’s a shame reserves can’t participate in daily open time.

Agreed, but there’s only so much flying the few lineholder a can do. So, reserves will get some of it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands