First Week Openers
#21
Unless we get substantial raises across the board AND significant contract/QoL improvements there is no reason to be first.
#22
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 35
From: baller, shot caller
There's no reason to try to get others hyped up over the prospect of a TA by years end. Now if these wild circumstances make that happen then great, I'd love to be wrong but I certainly wouldn't put money on it. You should seriously consider searching this forum back to 2016-17 to get a better idea of who we're dealing with.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
A me too could also be added in case we do get leap frogged in short order.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
They can by providing a real QOL and paying WB pay on a narrow body. And yes I’m serious
#26
That/It/Thang
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 367
But at a certain point, "money talks and bs walks." I think 90% of us couldnt care less if the call sign had "heavy" in it, as long as the money and qol is right.
#27
We don't have to solve ALL attrition and never will as long as there is 15k retirements at AA, etc, etc we just have to just have to be XX% of what we expect the new legacy rates to be, or wait to see what the legacy rates are. Though... in our unique situation, I reckon a stop gap LOA until a merger contract could possibly work too.
#28
Sure, but that will never happen under this management team.
#30
That/It/Thang
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 367
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



