![]() |
Originally Posted by AR1978
(Post 3501552)
With Spirit losing over half of it’s new hires to legacies as well as things like the regionals and Alaska Airlines increasing their pay there appears to be pressure to come up with something. I’m not sure what that “something” would be though.
|
Bendo generated “something” will probably surprise even in this pressured environment. Guy is a toxic 1990’s trained union busting relic.
Question is does he sue us before Christmas or after. |
Originally Posted by trd270
(Post 3501332)
Good for you. Surplus of pilots, but the operation is still a dumpster fire. (Don’t deny it. I have friends that are colleagues of yours) enjoy that and go troll somewhere else
Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Directautogroup
(Post 3501837)
Bendo generated “something” will probably surprise even in this pressured environment. Guy is a toxic 1990’s trained union busting relic.
Question is does he sue us before Christmas or after. |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 3502039)
PTSD is strong around here between Bendo and Frankie sheesh.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3502046)
Rule #1- If you haven’t been here for a previous negotiation, shut thy mouth.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3502046)
Rule #1- If you haven’t been here for a previous negotiation, shut thy mouth.
|
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 3502039)
PTSD is strong around here between Bendo and Frankie sheesh.
|
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3502081)
I think he's in for a rude awakening in about two months
We can all fill a trash can with what he doesn’t know about Spirit management and it’s history with negotiations. |
Where’s my effin’ quid!!!
|
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 3502039)
PTSD is strong around here between Bendo and Frankie sheesh.
|
Originally Posted by Tranquility
(Post 3502120)
Where’s my effin’ quid!!!
MCDU, what you know about quid? About 1000 of us are owed some big time quid! |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3502112)
He is the same one who said “people posting on the internet won’t cause any issues” or some crap like that.
We can all fill a trash can with what he doesn’t know about Spirit management and it’s history with negotiations. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3502138)
To be fair, this is a different environment. We’re competing with Mesa for pilots.
It’s just the arrogance of some to tell sailors who have been to sea a few times “waves arent that bad, looks calm from the docks”. |
You act like this is my first rodeo…it ain’t
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3502046)
Rule #1- If you haven’t been here for a previous negotiation, shut thy mouth.
No one cares about battle stars on union pins, the room isn’t going to fall silent when I enter because the company sued me. The junior guys don’t care about who has been furloughed nearly 15 years ago. And I wouldn’t either if I were them. Hate to break it to you sailor, none of that matters, the only important thing is the next contract, the one they do have a voice in. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3502112)
He is the same one who said “people posting on the internet won’t cause any issues” or some crap like that.
We can all fill a trash can with what he doesn’t know about Spirit management and it’s history with negotiations. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3502262)
It’s really going to ruin your day when you figure out your opinion (read: vote) is worth exactly the same as his.
No one cares about battle stars on union pins, the room isn’t going to fall silent when I enter because the company sued me. The junior guys don’t care about who has been furloughed nearly 15 years ago. And I wouldn’t either if I were them. Hate to break it to you sailor, none of that matters, the only important thing is the next contract, the one they do have a voice in. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3502262)
It’s really going to ruin your day when you figure out your opinion (read: vote) is worth exactly the same as his.
No one cares about battle stars on union pins, the room isn’t going to fall silent when I enter because the company sued me. The junior guys don’t care about who has been furloughed nearly 15 years ago. And I wouldn’t either if I were them. Hate to break it to you sailor, none of that matters, the only important thing is the next contract, the one they do have a voice in. I believe what Cinco is referring to, is this management team (specifically Bendo) is historically known for games and bs of getting our hopes up. Don’t for a second believe Bendo is going to hand out a TA without getting “his”. He’s ruthless and his past speaks for itself. Hopefully, I’m proven wrong. Like you said, our votes are equal no matter how long you’ve been here. I just hope we have something to vote on sooner rather than later. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3502262)
It’s really going to ruin your day when you figure out your opinion (read: vote) is worth exactly the same as his.
No one cares about battle stars on union pins, the room isn’t going to fall silent when I enter because the company sued me. The junior guys don’t care about who has been furloughed nearly 15 years ago. And I wouldn’t either if I were them. Hate to break it to you sailor, none of that matters, the only important thing is the next contract, the one they do have a voice in. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3502292)
I don't get you. Nobody said anything about votes. They were talking about experience with your management team, and what can likely be expected from them.
As for what we can expect from management? It’s not really some secret: The absolute least amount of ground they have to concede to keep the metal moving. In the history of airline negotiations there has never been a management group who have come to the table with empathy and concern that pilots will feel validated and appreciated. Any gains they concede will be solely out of recognition of pilot market scarcity, and not one single dollar more. Anything above that will require pilot unity, which is where his opinion and vote means the same as the noob he told to keep their mouth shut. |
Originally Posted by sioux8ships
(Post 3502286)
Once again, I’m pretty sure you’re missing the point. Nobody is talking about battle stars(which maybe you should have a bit more respect for the guys that walked the line), TRO’s and furloughs.
I believe what Cinco is referring to, is this management team (specifically Bendo) is historically known for games and bs of getting our hopes up. Don’t for a second believe Bendo is going to hand out a TA without getting “his”. He’s ruthless and his past speaks for itself. Hopefully, I’m proven wrong. Like you said, our votes are equal no matter how long you’ve been here. I just hope we have something to vote on sooner rather than later. Now it’s simply a numbers game. They know a pay raise is inevitable, but each day it’s put off is found money as payroll is the most controllable expense. The other side of that scale is gambling on attrition, combined with examples of other airlines pay raises. They make decisions based on balance sheets and projections, not based on how they think pilots will feel vs their peers. You don’t have to be a grizzled Spirit veteran to understand this is a zero sum game. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3502342)
Unless he was on the negotiating committee (he wasn’t) then he has no more “experience with the management team” than anyone else.
As for what we can expect from management? It’s not really some secret: The absolute least amount of ground they have to concede to keep the metal moving. In the history of airline negotiations there has never been a management group who have come to the table with empathy and concern that pilots will feel validated and appreciated. Any gains they concede will be solely out of recognition of pilot market scarcity, and not one single dollar more. Anything above that will require pilot unity, which is where his opinion and vote means the same as the noob he told to keep their mouth shut. You are like the more intelligent version of our Bandwagon/Softpayman. That's not a compliment. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3502374)
They know a pay raise is inevitable, but each day it’s put off is found money as payroll is the most controllable expense.
|
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 3502400)
Which is why we need 100% retro pay!
we’re in early opener now. |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 3502187)
You act like this is my first rodeo…it ain’t
|
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3502419)
Well that is fantastic. Hopefully this means you've learned to manage your expectations and won't be disappointed when they start playing games with us.
GMAFB! |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 3502400)
Which is why we need 100% retro pay!
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3502386)
It's pretty clear to those with more experience the other guy was exhibiting undue optimism and naivete. He wasn't demonstrating the realities you present, and they were pointing that out. Nothing about votes...
You are like the more intelligent version of our Bandwagon/Softpayman. That's not a compliment. |
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3502411)
retro to when, exactly?
we’re in early opener now. Period. And yet when I mention it to CAs and FOs I'm usually met with "What's retro pay mean?" And if you think we're going to get a contract accomplished in early openers... well... I hope you're right, but I highly doubt it. I expect nothing less than the last contract series of events to play out long term, only to get thrown in the trash once the merger is complete. I hope I'm wrong. Listen to, or read in your email, the latest Podcast talking about contract 2018. (IDK if you were here or not, but it's the one I was here for.) That's the sugarcoated version. It was way worse. And then read about Contract 9000, which I was not here for, and ask someone who was. |
Man is everyone stuck living in the past at spirit? You’re probably all the same captains that completely lose their **** when one item is changed on a checklist….
|
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 3502535)
Retro always. With every new contract signed. With every airline.
Period. And yet when I mention it to CAs and FOs I'm usually met with "What's retro pay mean?" And if you think we're going to get a contract accomplished in early openers... well... I hope you're right, but I highly doubt it. I expect nothing less than the last contract series of events to play out long term, only to get thrown in the trash once the merger is complete. I hope I'm wrong. Listen to, or read in your email, the latest Podcast talking about contract 2018. (IDK if you were here or not, but it's the one I was here for.) That's the sugarcoated version. It was way worse. And then read about Contract 9000, which I was not here for, and ask someone who was. Haha, 2017 we had a bad attrition problem. Heck, we couldn’t get guys to show up to class!! I agree with Ed- gonna be 2018 all over again. Company is playing chess and we’re stuck on Shoots and Ladders! |
Originally Posted by sioux8ships
(Post 3502566)
But.. but…, this time is different! We’ve got record attrition and this is the best bargaining environment we’ve ever seen! AC are coming and I’m sure Teddy needs keep the operation afloat! Bendo said we’d get a fast TA!!
Haha, 2017 we had a bad attrition problem. Heck, we couldn’t get guys to show up to class!! I agree with Ed- gonna be 2018 all over again. Company is playing chess and we’re stuck on Shoots and Ladders! |
Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
(Post 3502580)
Though how concerned management is about our attrition is debatable.
I think screwing the newbies is starting to screw the whole pilot group. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3502610)
Why should they be worried? They aren’t losing any great number of senior CAs. The senior FOs they are losing are easily replaced by newbies who will only cost them an Airbus type rating and maybe $50k the first year - H€||, they probably make money on the deal, especially when you consider the non vested DC forfeited by the departing FOs and junior CAs. And every departing CA opens up an upgrade slot to convince another senior FO to stick around for awhile and, being junior to the departed guy, will be doing the same job for less money.
I think screwing the newbies is starting to screw the whole pilot group. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3502453)
By that measure you have exactly zero experience with NK management/negotiations, which means when it comes to anything related to a TA you should dutifully follow Cinco’s opinion about keeping your mouth shut :)
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3502610)
Why should they be worried? They aren’t losing any great number of senior CAs. The senior FOs they are losing are easily replaced by newbies who will only cost them an Airbus type rating and maybe $50k the first year - H€||, they probably make money on the deal, especially when you consider the non vested DC forfeited by the departing FOs and junior CAs. And every departing CA opens up an upgrade slot to convince another senior FO to stick around for awhile and, being junior to the departed guy, will be doing the same job for less money.
I think screwing the newbies is starting to screw the whole pilot group. |
Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
(Post 3503331)
Possibly a strain on the training department is the issue. Being maxed out and not being able to keep up with staffing the incoming planes. Time will tell, you could be right though.
|
Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
(Post 3503331)
Possibly a strain on the training department is the issue. Being maxed out and not being able to keep up with staffing the incoming planes. Time will tell, you could be right though.
|
What's the cliff notes from the ALPA call today?
Unfortunately I wasn't able to tune in. I've been shook up since this morning when I had a virtual accident in my DriveSim driving simulator at home. Was off today so I like to do casual Sunday afternoon drives in the sim to relax. I was driving the Blue Ridge Parkway in Virginia and had just gone through a 4 way stop when I was T boned from a car running the stop sign. Wasn't in the frame of mind to listen in but I'm guessing it's something along the lines of "good progress was made but we're still far apart on many issues" along with they can't divulge the details of the negotiations due to NDA as well as to keep the upper hand in negotiating position. Similar to the Town Halls I would guess. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:22 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands