![]() |
First Week Openers
Will we get any info from our NC about this week’s negotiations, or do we not hear anything until all is said and done and it’s time for a vote?
|
Originally Posted by BlueSideUp85
(Post 3492217)
Will we get any info from our NC about this week’s negotiations, or do we not hear anything until all is said and done and it’s time for a vote?
|
Originally Posted by sioux8ships
(Post 3492226)
You’ll most likely hear “progress was made in the areas we’re focused on”. That’s about it.
|
Last time around the NC would put out a com towards the end of the day. And as Sioux8 said, it often had “progress was made, but significant differences remain”…
|
Originally Posted by Tranquility
(Post 3492240)
Last time around the NC would put out a com towards the end of the day. And as Sioux8 said, it often had “progress was made, but significant differences remain”…
|
Originally Posted by sioux8ships
(Post 3492226)
You’ll most likely hear “progress was made in the areas we’re focused on”. That’s about it.
“Although progress was made, significant differences remain” (Haha. Just saw Tranquility had the same quote) |
So with 27 more meetings schedule until December does that mean we will see nothing until after December and possibly March? Or is there any remote possibility of a temporary change to things like compensation to slow the bleeding?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by W6TRP
(Post 3494717)
So with 27 more meetings schedule until December does that mean we will see nothing until after December and possibly March? Or is there any remote possibility of a temporary change to things like compensation to slow the bleeding?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Bendo usually likes to be away from Miramar for the holiday meltdown. |
Originally Posted by W6TRP
(Post 3494717)
So with 27 more meetings schedule until December does that mean we will see nothing until after December and possibly March? Or is there any remote possibility of a temporary change to things like compensation to slow the bleeding?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3494733)
I would love to be wrong, but if history is any indicator we won't see anything by December or even March of next year.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3494736)
Eventually, even the CAs on reserve will be gone and the wet-ink ATPs and Aussies they are recruiting won’t have enough 121 time to upgrade. At that point they either raise pay or start downgrading CAs.
|
Originally Posted by W6TRP
(Post 3494717)
So with 27 more meetings schedule until December does that mean we will see nothing until after December and possibly March? Or is there any remote possibility of a temporary change to things like compensation to slow the bleeding?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3494877)
I'm a new hire and haven't been through any TA or CBA negotiation...
|
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3494909)
And that is where I stopped reading.
|
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3494909)
And that is where I stopped reading.
new-hires Have opinions too. And as a non new hire I agree with him. Pay hikes coming. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3494921)
And you popped out of the womb as a little Jimmy Hoffa, union/contract genius. You’ve been through negotiations.. great .. perhaps you wear your merit badge on your Karbon ? That and $2.50 will get you a bus fare.
new-hires Have opinions too. And as a non new hire I agree with him. Pay hikes coming. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2002
(Post 3494921)
And you popped out of the womb as a little Jimmy Hoffa, union/contract genius. You’ve been through negotiations.. great
|
I could be wrong but I think anyone that knows spirit management would be extremely surprised to see anything before a JCBA w JetBlue. These guys will literally pass outlandish proposals on things they don’t even care about just to waste our time for months on the topic. And then they will get restraining orders on us. This is a marathon and we are asking what happened in the first meeting?
|
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3494915)
Literally couldn't care any less.... Please tell me about the last time you were in these circumstances while the company and union attempted to negotiate a TA. We'll all sit here and wait patiently.
|
Let them play their old school games. If Alaska or a big 4 get a pay raise first it will just raise the bar. I almost don’t want to be the first Airbus pilot to get a pay raise….
|
Originally Posted by GrumpyCaptain
(Post 3495241)
Let them play their old school games. If Alaska or a big 4 get a pay raise first it will just raise the bar. I almost don’t want to be the first Airbus pilot to get a pay raise….
Unless we get substantial raises across the board AND significant contract/QoL improvements there is no reason to be first. |
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3494915)
Literally couldn't care any less.... Please tell me about the last time you were in these circumstances while the company and union attempted to negotiate a TA. We'll all sit here and wait patiently.
There's no reason to try to get others hyped up over the prospect of a TA by years end. Now if these wild circumstances make that happen then great, I'd love to be wrong but I certainly wouldn't put money on it. You should seriously consider searching this forum back to 2016-17 to get a better idea of who we're dealing with. |
Originally Posted by GrumpyCaptain
(Post 3495241)
Let them play their old school games. If Alaska or a big 4 get a pay raise first it will just raise the bar. I almost don’t want to be the first Airbus pilot to get a pay raise….
A me too could also be added in case we do get leap frogged in short order. |
The biggest obstacle is that people aren’t leaving for pay only. It’s a factor, but people are leaving for seniority progression and to fly wide bodies eventually. Spirit can’t solve those problems.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3495288)
The biggest obstacle is that people aren’t leaving for pay only. It’s a factor, but people are leaving for seniority progression and to fly wide bodies eventually. Spirit can’t solve those problems.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3495288)
The biggest obstacle is that people aren’t leaving for pay only. It’s a factor, but people are leaving for seniority progression and to fly wide bodies eventually. Spirit can’t solve those problems.
But at a certain point, "money talks and bs walks." I think 90% of us couldnt care less if the call sign had "heavy" in it, as long as the money and qol is right. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3495374)
I agree, and thats a lump that Spirit, SWA and the like have to deal with.
But at a certain point, "money talks and bs walks." I think 90% of us couldnt care less if the call sign had "heavy" in it, as long as the money and qol is right. We don't have to solve ALL attrition and never will as long as there is 15k retirements at AA, etc, etc we just have to just have to be XX% of what we expect the new legacy rates to be, or wait to see what the legacy rates are. Though... in our unique situation, I reckon a stop gap LOA until a merger contract could possibly work too. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3495374)
I agree, and thats a lump that Spirit, SWA and the like have to deal with.
But at a certain point, "money talks and bs walks." I think 90% of us couldnt care less if the call sign had "heavy" in it, as long as the money and qol is right. |
Are the early open discussions solely focused on a TA or are they also talking about a mou for the short term?
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3495407)
Sure, but that will never happen under this management team.
|
Originally Posted by 93Sierra
(Post 3495409)
Are the early open discussions solely focused on a TA or are they also talking about a mou for the short term?
We only know what the Union tells us. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by GrumpyCaptain
(Post 3495241)
Let them play their old school games. If Alaska or a big 4 get a pay raise first it will just raise the bar. I almost don’t want to be the first Airbus pilot to get a pay raise….
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3495450)
Only airbus? I would want to include Southwest and other Boeing operators.
|
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3494909)
And that is where I stopped reading.
|
Originally Posted by OneplusF
(Post 3495657)
Except he makes more sense than you do. I’m guessing an AIP in 90 days or less.
After 2 years in formal Section 6 negotiations without "any meaningful headway" Southwest Airline's pilot union has voted in favor of federal mediation. - From Thursday |
Originally Posted by YellowBus
(Post 3496148)
Just one of the many examples against everyone's "shortage will fix everything quickly" line of thinking.
After 2 years in formal Section 6 negotiations without "any meaningful headway" Southwest Airline's pilot union has voted in favor of federal mediation. - From Thursday |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3495412)
Go to any subforum and its pilots talking about how their management is the worst and how inept they are.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3496186)
A better comp for us are the regional airlines, which like us, are stepping stones currently.
This is verbatim coming from a current Spirit FO who has a CJO with Delta to me. “Just come to Spirit and get the type rating. The training pay and first year pay is crap, but you’ll get picked up by a major in your first year anyway.” |
Originally Posted by Flyboy68
(Post 3496558)
This is true coming from a regional pilot.
This is verbatim coming from a current Spirit FO who has a CJO with Delta to me. “Just come to Spirit and get the type rating. The training pay and first year pay is crap, but you’ll get picked up by a major in your first year anyway.” |
What's the impression that with these negotiations, the training pay will be fixed?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:05 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands