![]() |
Originally Posted by azboy
(Post 3563582)
The way I see this, it’s like getting a raise at the start of negotiations while we negotiate real pay rates.
For example, if we weren’t in an impending merger and the company comes to us in March when the contract becomes amendable and say we will offer you a raise now while we negotiate the real pay rates. Instead of being stuck at current pay rates while we negotiate for 2-3 years we get a nice raise, who would say no to that? This is basically what’s happening, we are getting a raise all the while having more rounds of negotiations coming in the next couple years with the merger. And we will be then negotiating with B6 who have at least shown they are willing to pay. And if the merger doesn’t go through we go straight back to the table negotiating. Just my two cents. |
I was shocked reading this. After seeing the JetBlue rates I can’t believe this pilot group would even entertain this TA.
|
Originally Posted by Notarealpilot
(Post 3563785)
I was shocked reading this. After seeing the JetBlue rates I can’t believe this pilot group would even entertain this TA.
|
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3563790)
Spirit will have to go find more money. Not saying they won’t or they can’t but those are possibilities. This TA was put on credit.
|
Originally Posted by Notarealpilot
(Post 3563785)
I was shocked reading this. After seeing the JetBlue rates I can’t believe this pilot group would even entertain this TA.
|
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3563806)
I’m not saying this to be mean but you must be new here. I’m a solid no voter but after 20 years of flying for various airlines I’d honestly be surprised if it doesn’t pass. Pilots will sell their souls for about $1. Right now we actually have leverage and when this mess goes through the company can raise first year pay at will, which is the only reason they are coming to the table right now. If they could raise first year pay whenever they wanted none of the rest of us would be included in that like we are now. After looking at Alaska rates and JB rates this should be an easy No vote for the group but I’m not holding my breath.
I’m looking forward to seeing these huge gains by the F9 guys once NK is gone. Because they make it sound easy enough, “just vote it down” and on comes another truck full of money. |
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3563806)
I’m not saying this to be mean but you must be new here. I’m a solid no voter but after 20 years of flying for various airlines I’d honestly be surprised if it doesn’t pass. Pilots will sell their souls for about $1. Right now we actually have leverage and when this mess goes through the company can raise first year pay at will, which is the only reason they are coming to the table right now. If they could raise first year pay whenever they wanted none of the rest of us would be included in that like we are now. After looking at Alaska rates and JB rates this should be an easy No vote for the group but I’m not holding my breath.
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3563793)
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t they take out a loan for $600 Million? The TA is worth $469 Million over two years. Pretty big piece of the pie.
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3563793)
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t they take out a loan for $600 Million? The TA is worth $469 Million over two years. Pretty big piece of the pie.
|
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3563840)
Assuming the rest is for the FAs but not to say they couldn’t give us the rest and let the FAs spin their wheels for a while. There’s always a wide eyed Walmart greeter with dreams of overnighting in St. Louis ready to fill the void.
|
For everyone so concerned that the company is losing money our ceo wasn’t the 5th highest paid in the industry and spirit is only the 10th largest airline. Teddy is paid more than Frontier, JB, Alaskan, Hawaiian CEO’s give the fact that two of those airlines are larger than spirit he’s overpaid.
|
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3563861)
For everyone so concerned that the company is losing money our ceo wasn’t the 5th highest paid in the industry and spirit is only the 10th largest airline. Teddy is paid more than Frontier, JB, Alaskan, Hawaiian CEO’s give the fact that two of those airlines are larger than spirit he’s overpaid.
CEO compensation has never correlated to the health of a company. Sad, but true. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3563855)
I read somewhere that they used the rest of the money to consolidate debt or something to that effect.
It’s a “rob Peter to pay Paul” move except the new money is almost double interest rate they have on that loan now. So their loan servicing expenses just increased too. Spirit will use some of that to pay off the note and the other is to probably go towards our contract, FAs and I think either the dispatchers or mechanics are up too. They will be in the red this year so this is more debt to keep them afloat. What a fantastically horrible job they are doing. This is some of the reason why many of us feel a bird in the broke ass company hand is worth more today than a chance they come back tomorrow. |
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3563861)
For everyone so concerned that the company is losing money our ceo wasn’t the 5th highest paid in the industry and spirit is only the 10th largest airline. Teddy is paid more than Frontier, JB, Alaskan, Hawaiian CEO’s give the fact that two of those airlines are larger than spirit he’s overpaid.
|
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3563928)
I honestly couldn’t care less what the executives get paid. That’s their business it has zero correlation to what we do or should get paid. I would love for more pilots to think like executives when it comes to negotiating compensation though. The company’s financial status shouldn’t be considered when negotiating the value you bring as an employee.
|
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3563928)
The company’s financial status shouldn’t be considered when negotiating the value you bring as an employee.
|
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3564084)
I absolutely agree with that.
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3564113)
so then they should all pay us $700/hour no problem then?
|
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3564116)
If that’s what the market rate is then yes.
just another reason you can’t have a serious debate with a No voter… |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3564113)
so then they should all pay us $700/hour no problem then?
|
Originally Posted by I was inverted
(Post 3564130)
$300/hr narrowbody rates sounded crazy a few years ago. $380 A320 and $383 A321 rates sounded crazy until Delta AIP’d it. Supply and demand. Inflation. Etc.
|
Originally Posted by Conquistador27
(Post 3563867)
CEO compensation has never correlated to the health of a company. Sad, but true.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/best-pa...ies-1469419262 |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3564137)
Price of eggs has gone up almost 50% in a year, apparently due to low supply. Not saying we are eggs, but still.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3564144)
Inflation has nothing to do with it. This contract cements our place as a bottom tier airbus operator. We are giving up quite a bit of leverage, and they didn’t give us a raise out of the goodness of their hearts. I understand the NC’s position, but we have leverage and squandered it for a contract that’s in line with old legacy contracts.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3564144)
This contract cements our place as a bottom tier airbus operator
a misleading lie you guys keep saying over and over again to scare people…yet it’s not true at all. Not fooling me |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3564137)
Price of eggs has gone up almost 50% in a year, apparently due to low supply. Not saying we are eggs, but still.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3564150)
Not sure about your reading comprehension here. I really thought I said the rates for our TA should have been way higher.....
I don’t agree with the “3 bites at the apple” approach the NC is taking, but oh well. I said my peace with my vote. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3564139)
It actually has. Lower CEO compensation related to higher long term profitability.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/best-pa...ies-1469419262 |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3564113)
so then they should all pay us $700/hour no problem then?
Add all those up and get the operating costs for that particular flight. Now take what you think industry standard compensation would cost them additionally to what you make now per hour for both pilots, multiply that by your block time, and divide it by that total for the other costs. It’s nothing, it’s a rounding error. Paying us the market rate for narrow body crews is NOT what is going to prevent the company from turning a profit. |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3563840)
Assuming the rest is for the FAs but not to say they couldn’t give us the rest and let the FAs spin their wheels for a while. There’s always a wide eyed Walmart greeter with dreams of overnighting in St. Louis ready to fill the void.
|
“Arguably, it is possible that management could decide to return to the bargaining table quickly and offer more money. But throughout negotiations we need to deal with probabilities rather than possibilities. Based on our collective experience, and due to Spirit’s current financial situation, in our opinion this is unlikely. And in the unlikely event they are open to improving the TA, it may not happen on a timetable that is acceptable to our pilot group. We can look to the UAL negotiations as a recent example. The UAL/ALPA TA was put out for pilot ratification in June and then voted down. The parties have returned to the bargaining table, but to date no new TA has been announced and the timetable for one is unclear.” -SPA_ExecSummary
Don’t be unrealistic guys. If I could vote it would be a yes and then come back to the table during the successful or failed merger. Y’all can argue for Delta plus in about two years. |
Originally Posted by AndroidPilot
(Post 3564296)
“Arguably, it is possible that management could decide to return to the bargaining table quickly and offer more money. But throughout negotiations we need to deal with probabilities rather than possibilities. Based on our collective experience, and due to Spirit’s current financial situation, in our opinion this is unlikely. And in the unlikely event they are open to improving the TA, it may not happen on a timetable that is acceptable to our pilot group. We can look to the UAL negotiations as a recent example. The UAL/ALPA TA was put out for pilot ratification in June and then voted down. The parties have returned to the bargaining table, but to date no new TA has been announced and the timetable for one is unclear.” -SPA_ExecSummary
Don’t be unrealistic guys. If I could vote it would be a yes and then come back to the table during the successful or failed merger. Y’all can argue for Delta plus in about two years. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3564308)
They must be realllllly concerned about the current vote tally….
|
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3564308)
They must be realllllly concerned about the current vote tally….
|
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3564349)
I assume this was all pre-planned. They’re putting out information (in favor of their point of view) slowly and consistently to try to sway opinions (disclaimer, I agree with their opinion).
|
Heard an interesting thing on my last trip. Theory that if the JB NE alliance goes through, they'll use it as leverage with the feds to disband it and to rubber stamp the merger faster. If that happens, we'll be locked into whatever we have at the time since we will be under JB control. Not sure what the time line could be with this to happen but an interesting situation if it expedites fed approval, delaying a TA for a few more bucks could really hurt over the next few years.
|
Originally Posted by baseball3792
(Post 3564349)
I assume this was all pre-planned. They’re putting out information (in favor of their point of view) slowly and consistently to try to sway opinions (disclaimer, I agree with their opinion).
|
Originally Posted by AndroidPilot
(Post 3564296)
“Arguably, it is possible that management could decide to return to the bargaining table quickly and offer more money. But throughout negotiations we need to deal with probabilities rather than possibilities. Based on our collective experience, and due to Spirit’s current financial situation, in our opinion this is unlikely. And in the unlikely event they are open to improving the TA, it may not happen on a timetable that is acceptable to our pilot group. We can look to the UAL negotiations as a recent example. The UAL/ALPA TA was put out for pilot ratification in June and then voted down. The parties have returned to the bargaining table, but to date no new TA has been announced and the timetable for one is unclear.” -SPA_ExecSummary
Don’t be unrealistic guys. If I could vote it would be a yes and then come back to the table during the successful or failed merger. Y’all can argue for Delta plus in about two years. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3564365)
We'll get em next time!
|
Originally Posted by AndroidPilot
(Post 3564370)
In this industry you will never “get ‘em next time”, especially when you have a limitless goal post. You in particular will always want more. Let the “yes” voters have a voice and stop canceling peoples opinions that are opposite of yours.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:56 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands