![]() |
Good to know we have at least 900 pilots with a back bone.
|
Originally Posted by fumeevented
(Post 3568210)
Good to know we have at least 900 pilots with a back bone.
** 900 pilots with brain damage |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3568169)
Interesting…
A few moments ago as soon as this TA passed my pay is now higher than that of a NB American, United or Southwest pilot in the same seat and longevity. This is very interesting because according to all those no voters I am now the lowest paid airbus operator. And in about another year or two we are going back to contract negotiations for an even higher pay raise. moral of the story is; #Dont_Listen_To_DBs |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 3568223)
No offense but absolutely not paid more than United FOs OR captains on current contract. Certainly nowhere even close to delta's new deal. Should I also bring up JB?
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3568228)
I’m going off of APC with our A321 override. Not sure what you are going off of?
For example: 2nd year FO on the 320/321 is $147 and change. 2nd year 320/321 CA is $275 and change. |
Originally Posted by B200 Hawk
(Post 3568184)
This isn’t a contract lol. By definition we are operating on an old contract ourselves with a pay bump until JCBA or a full blown CBA. I’m not pleased with the rates offered but people need to stop being so dramatic.
|
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 3568232)
add 5% to any numbers on the apc table. that's outdated.
For example: 2nd year FO on the 320/321 is $147 and change. 2nd year 320/321 CA is $275 and change. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3568182)
And a good thing we will be right back at the table to build on those contracts for our next.
This vote was exactly like 2018, as I said it would be. Reminds me of UGA and TCU last night. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3568294)
for what airline?
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3568182)
And a good thing we will be right back at the table to build on those contracts for our next.
. |
Originally Posted by I was inverted
(Post 3568298)
Right back at the table, lol. You’ll be living under your new contract for probably 4-5 years. Enjoy.
Be a good boy and vote in that TA, daddy wants that snap up in the JCBA when we become a happy family. Run along, make it happen. |
Originally Posted by I was inverted
(Post 3568293)
It is an absolutely a contract. It may not be a completely negotiated new CBA, but it is most definitely a contract.
|
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3568309)
Company isn’t coming back to the table the only reason they came in the first place is because they wanted to raise first year pay and couldn’t. Now they can do it unilaterally, they aren’t coming back now.
Ever? We will never bargain for another contract like it says we have to in two years or when the JB merger fails? Good. It will be easier to prove to a mediator the company isn’t bargaining in good faith and we can get released. I’m also hoping they do raise first year pay, so when we do bargain again that will be the new bottom. |
Originally Posted by Conquistador27
(Post 3568335)
Ever? We will never bargain for another contract like it says we have to in two years or when the JB merger fails? Good. It will be easier to prove to a mediator the company isn’t bargaining in good faith and we can get released. I’m also hoping they do raise first year pay, so when we do bargain again that will be the new bottom.
|
Originally Posted by onedolla
(Post 3568394)
What’s to say year 1 and 2 pay can’t be within 2% of each other as a new standard going forward forever and they treat it the same they did for this new contract? Would that really be a “gain” for us?
|
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 3568168)
Sad. Really sad.
|
Originally Posted by B200 Hawk
(Post 3568332)
sorry meant. This is a 2 year deal with a stipulation of right back to the table if b6 falls through. This isn’t a 5 year stuck behind the industry type deal. It might take others a year before a TA, who knows what happens with the economy in the meantime. This contract is crap as a 5 year standard deal but it isn’t. We will be mid cycle now and have great leverage for a JCBA or standalone NK.
|
Originally Posted by FLYBOYMATTHEW
(Post 3568418)
The only way they'll be rushing back to the table in 2 years is to ask for concessions on industry-trailing rates if this merger doesn't happen. This management group has shown they can't run a consistently profitable airline, and somehow that is supposed to justify our underwhelming ask. This could easily be a 5-year deal in the case the merger falters.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3568311)
Sorry you guys won’t be able to use Spirit 2018 rates against us as leverage in the SLI or by your management for TPA/JCBA.
Be a good boy and vote in that TA, daddy wants that snap up in the JCBA when we become a happy family. Run along, make it happen. no your are right. We will instead use the fact you knowingly approved an inferior contract while we had a better offer on the table. thank you for solidifying your career expectations. If you expect our MEC to put forth any effort at all to bring you guys up during the TPA negotiations you are insane. You had your chance 2 months ago. Your union leadership sold you a bill of goods and I would put a paycheck bet on no financial gains during TPA. |
Originally Posted by DrDHD
(Post 3568424)
your beloved spirit is out of business if your merger with JetBlue fails. If it wasn’t for b6, the next airline in the USA to go bankrupt will be Spirit. Ulcc doesn’t work with your leadership team.
|
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3568429)
no your are right. We will instead use the fact you knowingly approved an inferior contract while we had a better offer on the table.
thank you for solidifying your career expectations. If you expect our MEC to put forth any effort at all to bring you guys up during the TPA negotiations you are insane. You had your chance 2 months ago. Your union leadership sold you a bill of goods and I would put a paycheck bet on no financial gains during TPA. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3568429)
no your are right. We will instead use the fact you knowingly approved an inferior contract while we had a better offer on the table.
thank you for solidifying your career expectations. If you expect our MEC to put forth any effort at all to bring you guys up during the TPA negotiations you are insane. You had your chance 2 months ago. Your union leadership sold you a bill of goods and I would put a paycheck bet on no financial gains during TPA. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3568429)
no your are right. We will instead use the fact you knowingly approved an inferior contract while we had a better offer on the table.
thank you for solidifying your career expectations. If you expect our MEC to put forth any effort at all to bring you guys up during the TPA negotiations you are insane. You had your chance 2 months ago. Your union leadership sold you a bill of goods and I would put a paycheck bet on no financial gains during TPA. 100% correct. Everyone here cheering crappy pay rates and thinking it will somehow help in a merger must not realize these new *fantastic* pay rates are still less than what JB’s will be. |
Originally Posted by onedolla
(Post 3568394)
What’s to say year 1 and 2 pay can’t be within 2% of each other as a new standard going forward forever and they treat it the same they did for this new contract? Would that really be a “gain” for us?
|
Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
(Post 3568451)
100% correct. Everyone here cheering crappy pay rates and thinking it will somehow help in a merger must not realize these new *fantastic* pay rates are still less than what JB’s will be.
|
Leverage.
You gave up leverage. |
Originally Posted by 680crewchief
(Post 3568631)
Leverage.
You gave up leverage. But what is done is done. Crying over spilt milk is fruitless. One way or another, we will be back in negotiations in two years or less, either for a JCBA or for a new CBA. For the NK guys voting no, you lost this time. Get your arguments, proposals, and wants to the MEC for the next go around. Same for the NK yes voters. This doesn’t stop here. For the non-NK guys, vote your own contracts any way you want. This one’s done. |
He said he gave up nothing for $50k.
I pointed out that is false. Carry on. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3568636)
Every contract that is ratified someone gives up leverage. Usually both parties.
But what is done is done. Crying over spilt milk is fruitless. One way or another, we will be back in negotiations in two years or less, either for a JCBA or for a new CBA. For the NK guys voting no, you lost this time. Get your arguments, proposals, and wants to the MEC for the next go around. Same for the NK yes voters. This doesn’t stop here. For the non-NK guys, vote your own contracts any way you want. This one’s done. |
Originally Posted by 680crewchief
(Post 3568631)
Leverage.
You gave up leverage. |
You're right. The training department gave up nothing. My bad.
|
Originally Posted by 680crewchief
(Post 3568650)
You're right. The training department gave up nothing. My bad.
|
Originally Posted by Tranquility
(Post 3568655)
The training department has had their golden goose and eggs for too long! I’m glad that they have to bid their own seniority….
|
Originally Posted by SlimBob
(Post 3568661)
And getting junior manned into LCKA duties is ok when you just what to bid a non-training line with your seniority? The LCKA will take all the 'good' trips with their bidding now not wondering what training will give them. What side are you on anyway? We can all apply to be training pilots too.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3568636)
Every contract that is ratified someone gives up leverage. Usually both parties.
But what is done is done. Crying over spilt milk is fruitless. One way or another, we will be back in negotiations in two years or less, either for a JCBA or for a new CBA. For the NK guys voting no, you lost this time. Get your arguments, proposals, and wants to the MEC for the next go around. Same for the NK yes voters. This doesn’t stop here. For the non-NK guys, vote your own contracts any way you want. This one’s done. 🙄 |
Originally Posted by 680crewchief
(Post 3568650)
You're right. The training department gave up nothing. My bad.
filler |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3568429)
no your are right. We will instead use the fact you knowingly approved an inferior contract while we had a better offer on the table.
thank you for solidifying your career expectations. If you expect our MEC to put forth any effort at all to bring you guys up during the TPA negotiations you are insane. You had your chance 2 months ago. Your union leadership sold you a bill of goods and I would put a paycheck bet on no financial gains during TPA. Good luck on that TPA snap up, ya know.....the 2nd "bite at the apple" I'll be sure to eat my words if it happens. See y'all at the JCBA table, I mean that sincerely. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3568311)
Sorry you guys won’t be able to use Spirit 2018 rates against us as leverage in the SLI or by your management for TPA/JCBA.
Be a good boy and vote in that TA, daddy wants that snap up in the JCBA when we become a happy family. Run along, make it happen. |
I just stop by to see if the No voters are still crying
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3569153)
I just stop by to see if the No voters are still crying
filler |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands