![]() |
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 3605209)
None international. All gone. Operation is now less than half of the launch size.
21 direct flights from DFW now, domestic and international. This is a base they shrank and displaced. Genius |
How is it possible international didn’t succeed in MIA when it prints money in FLL
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3605222)
16 direct flights from MIA now, all domestic as you mentioned. This is a location they made a hub and a crew base.
21 direct flights from DFW now, domestic and international. This is a base they shrank and displaced. Genius |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3605222)
16 direct flights from MIA now, all domestic as you mentioned. This is a location they made a hub and a crew base.
21 direct flights from DFW now, domestic and international. This is a base they shrank and displaced. Genius |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3605251)
How is it possible international didn’t succeed in MIA when it prints money in FLL
|
Originally Posted by king10pin02
(Post 3605285)
mia and fll serve the same market, so flying mia-south to routes we already fly fll-south doesnt add new passengers it dilutes the route
Which makes sense, it’s obvious, why do MIA when you can have easy FLL. So why did they attempt to make MIA something it isn’t? Can’t say it enough, this management team is clueless and checked out |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3605357)
Ted, or one of his lackeys, had their excuse for this on the last investor call. Basically “our market is so strong in FLL, our passengers are wanting to fly from FLL vs MIA”
Which makes sense, it’s obvious, why do MIA when you can have easy FLL. So why did they attempt to make MIA something it isn’t? Can’t say it enough, this management team is clueless and checked out |
At the same time I'm counting about 30 flights a day at Newark, which is a highly disruption-prone airport, and would make perfect sense for a base.
|
Originally Posted by BusBoi
(Post 3605376)
At the same time I'm counting about 30 flights a day at Newark, which is a highly disruption-prone airport, and would make perfect sense for a base.
|
Originally Posted by king10pin02
(Post 3605285)
mia and fll serve the same market, so flying mia-south to routes we already fly fll-south doesnt add new passengers it dilutes the route
I think it has more to do with airport user costs than anything. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:22 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands