![]() |
Originally Posted by Bluediver
(Post 3707629)
Yes that is how it works.
Obviously like anything in this business, doesn't always work. |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3707612)
I think it’ll come down to QOWL. Not knowing how pairings would be constructed and reserve utilized is a challenge when trying to decide how we want a contract to be.
One way to meet in the middle is to maybe have a window for reserve to drop after line holders? Maybe we some sort of no-fly lines where some pilots get to stay home for MMG or 50 hours and not get called at all and no need for reserve (great for slower months and maybe busy months too). Just a few ideas off the top of my head. I do think there’s a way for all of us to win though. As much as I, and many other NK pilots that I talk to/fly with, are nervous about our QOL in the JCBA, we are hopeful and excited for the merger |
Originally Posted by Bluediver
(Post 3707629)
Yes that is how it works.
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 3707606)
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe reserve is much longer at JB on the 320 out of FLL and MCO? I would assume that’s why JB spent time negotiating certain reserve rules?
I think it’s about 2-3 years after upgrade on the NK side (at best) to a line. So something like 5-6 year seniority at the company in total for a junior line? At the moment, our junior CAs get used a ton in the FL bases so they regularly credit 100+ a month. Some super senior guys bud reserve and don’t generally don’t fly at all (RAP dependent). I think the challenge for both pilot groups is trying to agree on a JCBA when we have no idea what the pairings will be constructed and how reserve pilots would be utilized within their buckets/silos In fact not nearly as many from the NE bases chose to go to FL bases, much less than the company wanted. So they will be hiring into the FL bases in my opinion. And looking backwards at NK's historical reserve times is not very useful. Even as a standalone company, movement at Spirit (especially to and within the left seat) is slowing. This isn't a 50 jet new ULCC anymore. The bigger the pilot group gets, the longer it will take to reach 50% or 40% etc... The size vs growth rate just isn't the same anymore as it was when it was smaller. Your airline, our airlines are maturing, and your airline especially doesn't have the retirements to even partially offset that. All of that means pilots hired today, or upgrading in the next few years, will experience longer reserve times when they transition to the left seat, and even in the right seat in some bases. Reserve should be, and now must be a humane and viable choice for pilots across the entire seniority spectrum. Our union should create as many desirable positions as possible, not allow some to get fat by eating the reserves QOL. |
Originally Posted by ftaba1
(Post 3707637)
Thank you! Looks like your reserve rules are already better than NK’s. Although i suppose it really depends on how green your grid is.
Shifting gears, What do you guys get for PTO hours (outside of vacation accrual) and sick time? |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3707640)
From a flexibility standpoint of dropping or moving days around, yes. But we still need improvement, particularly in long call rules. Specifically escalation from LCR to SCR. Should pay a lot more for escalations, and should provide a hotel room.
Shifting gears, What do you guys get for PTO hours (outside of vacation accrual) and sick time? |
Originally Posted by ftaba1
(Post 3707658)
We don’t have PTO time per se, we only accrue sick time, 5 hours/month. But we can use vacation hours to cover drops. Our vacation accrual is better than JB’s though.
|
Originally Posted by ftaba1
(Post 3707658)
We don’t have PTO time per se, we only accrue sick time, 5 hours/month. But we can use vacation hours to cover drops. Our vacation accrual is better than JB’s though.
|
Originally Posted by Forward lav
(Post 3707665)
No it’s not.
|
Originally Posted by ftaba1
(Post 3707669)
Yes it is, according to the Contract comparison guide that our MEC put together. Take a look at the ‘annual vacation days per longevity year’ slide. It clearly shows NK’s is better. For example, JBs acrrual goes to 21 days of vacation at year 10 longevity, NK at year 6, etc.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands