In the Boston Courtroom.
01-16-2024 | 09:38 AM
#122
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
01-16-2024 | 09:42 AM
#123
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 44
01-16-2024 | 09:59 AM
#127
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 115
From: Joystick Operator
01-16-2024 | 09:59 AM
#128
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 228
From: UNA
as a guess, the judge’s premise to shoot down the merger seemed to revolve around NK’s business model. F9 has the same one and might get past the DOJ. On the flip side the DOJ was just emboldened to attack any and every merger with this ruling.
01-16-2024 | 10:01 AM
#129
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
"Indeed, the Defendant Airlines and others in the
market, in the context of the unique and dynamic market forces
of the airline industry may decide to take another run at a
merger at any time. The Government will no doubt make its
determination –- as it is duty-bound to do -- as to whether such
a proposed merger sufficiently protects competition. Of course,
while the Court always encourages parties to resolve their
differences without judicial intervention, the courthouse doors
remain open should the Defendant Airlines decide to try again"
Doesnt sound promising for the future either.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
