Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Biden and Buttg are to blame for furloughs >

Biden and Buttg are to blame for furloughs

Search

Notices

Biden and Buttg are to blame for furloughs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2024 | 05:24 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 729
Likes: 22
From: Bus CA
Default

Originally Posted by PositiveRate20
Please correct me if I'm wrong here. Didn't Spirit shareholders vote in favor of the JB merger over the F9 merger? Didn't NK management warn shareholders that they were not confident that a JB merger would be approved? So if NK mgmt warned against a JB merger and the shareholders voted for the JB merger anyway, is there not an argument here that the NK shareholders have a large share of the responsibility for the current situation?
Yes. And it went exactly as they had told the shareholders. As soon as JetBlue had the bigger shareholders salivating, Spirit was in for some hurt. But the shareholders are okay, because they had their ticking fees and other assurances. In it for the short term bucks, the shareholders risked a good airline for a long shot and a little bit of cash.

i still think there’s a path for survival for the airline currently know as Spirit, whether it be a merger (that doesn’t involve little Robin) or restructuring.
Old 04-09-2024 | 07:30 AM
  #22  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,120
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by texas1970
The Biden administration can hardly be blamed for finally enforcing an antitrust law that should have been enforced for decades. By a plain reading of the Clayton Act, the merger was illegal. The judge agreed. Plain and simple. JetBlue could have appealed, but they chose not to. They wanted out, or they didn’t think they could win on appeal. Spirit management warned the shareholders about this. They knew too.

Especially in conservative circles, claims are made that judges are “activists” seeking results and need to instead follow the “text” of the law. Well… that’s exactly what both the DOJ and the judge did in this case. They followed the text of the law.

I agree that the best outcome would’ve been for the merger to be approved and I feel awful for you guys, but let’s be real about where the blame lies.
Good perspective here...

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...itrust/677192/
Old 04-09-2024 | 12:04 PM
  #23  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by texas1970
The Biden administration can hardly be blamed for finally enforcing an antitrust law that should have been enforced for decades. By a plain reading of the Clayton Act, the merger was illegal. The judge agreed. Plain and simple.
Plain and simple, federal anti-trust laws are unconstitutional.
Old 04-09-2024 | 12:30 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 354
Likes: 13
From: NYC Based 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8
I think it is a reach to blame this administration. If you want to blame someone for this merger not going through, I would blame JetBlue management. I truly believe that they started looking for the quickest and fastest escape offramp to get out of the merger once they got cold feet. Their arguments in court for the merger didn't do them any favors and then filing for the appeal and then shortly pulling the plug afterward was in my opinion a half-assed effort on their part to fight for the merger.

Bottomline, Spirit management is to blame for the position that Spirit is in today, having to rely on a merger to bail them out. It is unfortunate too.
JetBlue tried, the DOJ blocked it, they went to court, lost, appealed, and then decided that NK at its current value wasn't worth the significant multiple they were paying for it. It wasn't cold feet, it was a smart business decision.
Old 04-09-2024 | 12:38 PM
  #25  
PineappleXpres's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 131
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Plain and simple, federal anti-trust laws are unconstitutional.
How do you feel about the power of Apple and Google?
Old 04-09-2024 | 12:45 PM
  #26  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 198
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Plain and simple, federal anti-trust laws are unconstitutional.
then spirit/JetBlue should appeal and the Supreme Court should overturn them. Until that happens, judges and the DOJ are bound by the law as written.
Old 04-09-2024 | 01:39 PM
  #27  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by JayRalstonSmith
JetBlue tried, the DOJ blocked it, they went to court, lost, appealed, and then decided that NK at its current value wasn't worth the significant multiple they were paying for it. It wasn't cold feet, it was a smart business decision.
Smart decision, cold feet, call it what you want... I firmly believe JetBlue management wanted out of this deal before the judges ruling in all honesty..... They started a bidding war with Frontier like they did with Alaska back in the day to jack up the price for Spirit hoping Frontier would wreck its balance sheet to overpay. Only this time, they got caught holding the bag..

My point was, folks are wrongly trying to place blame at DOJ and Biden in reality that blame be placed with Spirit management/shareholders and JetBlue management....
Old 04-09-2024 | 02:56 PM
  #28  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Plain and simple, federal anti-trust laws are unconstitutional.
Isn't it kind of strange that the Supreme Court disagrees with you?

You seem to disagree with the Supreme Court and most constitutional scholars, maybe you should leave the aviation scene and become a federal judge.
Old 04-09-2024 | 03:42 PM
  #29  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 5
From: In the pipe in the upstairs water closet
Default

Not for nothing, but the judge who ruled on this case was a Reagan appointee. To argue that this horrible situation is purely political is nonsensical.
Old 04-09-2024 | 03:46 PM
  #30  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Isn't it kind of strange that the Supreme Court disagrees with you?

You seem to disagree with the Supreme Court and most constitutional scholars, maybe you should leave the aviation scene and become a federal judge.
Because 99% of what the federal government does is unconstitutional. Ever read the Constitution? It's pretty clear.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices