![]() |
Originally Posted by ropestart
(Post 3812775)
the 100 day turnaround is with new parts. They have to manufacture them first which can take up to two years. The 100 turnaround is very miss leading.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3813031)
Miss Demeanors , Miss Givings , Miss Fortunes, Miss whatever her name was.
|
Originally Posted by ropestart
(Post 3813063)
lol, couldn’t edit my post. Dont drink and post😂
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3813031)
Miss Demeanors , Miss Givings , Miss Fortunes, Miss whatever her name was.
|
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3812758)
With the 70 down it’ll actually be about 50 less than we have now bc we are still delivering new planes for the time being.
|
Originally Posted by BusBoi
(Post 3813249)
So you're saying we'll actually have more total planes available to fly next year than this year?
Im getting this off of the quarterly call and earnings report where it was described about 25 down now, 40 down at years end, and 70 down next year. I know the situation is very fluid with the Pratts and subject to change quickly. Feel free to correct my numbers if somebody else has something more accurate. |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3813264)
As of the last quarterly call you have 205 with ~ 180 flying. By years end 2024 you should have 215 with ~ 175 flying. By years end 2025 you should have 219 with ~ 149 flying.
Im getting this off of the quarterly call and earnings report where it was described about 25 down now, 40 down at years end, and 70 down next year. I know the situation is very fluid with the Pratts and subject to change quickly. Feel free to correct my numbers if somebody else has something more accurate. |
The point is moot anyway. We lose less money on the planes that are parked than the planes flying. Read that again. We do not make money on the planes we have flying!
Having more unprofitable planes flying doesn’t do us any good which is why Spirit deferred orders for two years. Spirit does not want this Pratt issue solved quickly. Any plane that is fixed and put back in service is another money loser. Spirit is bankrupt because of spirit not bc of Pratt |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3809206)
Who has more bankruptcies? Ted or Trump?
Both personally wealthy somehow "there's a sucker born every minute" |
Originally Posted by Noisecanceller
(Post 3813870)
The point is moot anyway. We lose less money on the planes that are parked than the planes flying. Read that again. We do not make money on the planes we have flying!
Having more unprofitable planes flying doesn’t do us any good which is why Spirit deferred orders for two years. Spirit does not want this Pratt issue solved quickly. Any plane that is fixed and put back in service is another money loser. Spirit is bankrupt because of spirit not bc of Pratt PW covers the cost of the parked planes but not lost revenue. The problem NK is suffering from, is having the staff and facilities for 250 airplanes, and only 180 airplanes actually generating revenue. We are over staffed on crews, middle management and a useless hotel type building and empty sim bay. Just running the AC alone is killing them. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands