Spirt filed for Chapter 11 again
#721
On Reserve
Joined: Jul 2025
Posts: 44
Likes: 18
From: In the gym
I am also starting over and trying to explain to people what is actually happening always leaves them what a strange look of concern on their face.
They (the customer) would much rather prefer to have the more experienced pilot sitting in the left seat.
I know I know, seniority and all, but the rest of the world in every other industry heavily weighs experience.
Maybe it's time we change that before another lesson is learned in blood.
#722
Almost there
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 109
Yeah, I hear ya. Can't argue that. Definitely can't have a lot of time off and make a lot a money the first year or two but beyond that I think it's pretty doable. I only point these things out because for years I buried my head in the sand thinking everyone at DAL/AA/UAL/SWA was lying or stretching the truth and leaving NK would be the hardest thing in the world (both QOL & Financially. ) and it just wasn't that bad
#723
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 335
I'm pretty sure that you are *never* required to take any employees in 363... that's the whole point, it's a BK mechanism.
If somebody buys a big chunk of planes and gates, would they maybe want the employees too so as to continue operations? Possibly, but that's their choice.
Also, when push comes to shove union contract provisions do not supersede bankruptcy proceedings.
If somebody buys a big chunk of planes and gates, would they maybe want the employees too so as to continue operations? Possibly, but that's their choice.
Also, when push comes to shove union contract provisions do not supersede bankruptcy proceedings.
#724
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
According to Federal Law (McCaskill Bond) if over 50% of an airline is purchased in any way including 363 sales, and they have unionized employees, the acquiring airline is required by law to do a seniority integration. Once that is done those employees have a right to work at the acquiring company because of their seniority.
363 exists for the express purpose of transferring stuff unencumbered. A carve out would defeat the whole purpose.
You can't just read 363 into the MB language. I think it would need to be stated specifically.
#725
I don't know man, I think the other poster has a point.
I am also starting over and trying to explain to people what is actually happening always leaves them what a strange look of concern on their face.
They (the customer) would much rather prefer to have the more experienced pilot sitting in the left seat.
I know I know, seniority and all, but the rest of the world in every other industry heavily weighs experience.
Maybe it's time we change that before another lesson is learned in blood.
I am also starting over and trying to explain to people what is actually happening always leaves them what a strange look of concern on their face.
They (the customer) would much rather prefer to have the more experienced pilot sitting in the left seat.
I know I know, seniority and all, but the rest of the world in every other industry heavily weighs experience.
Maybe it's time we change that before another lesson is learned in blood.
what is your definition of experienced and at what point do the industry pilots adorne you with your “experienced” members only jacket?
Yesterday I rode on a United 321 with a VERY junior CA and it was one of the most professional flight decks I had ever sat in. He was former military then JetBlue for a couple years (FO) then United. If I had been line Checking him it would have been significantly above average. He mentored his new hire FO well and I am glad he is a United Captain.
One of my best friends was a 5 year Spirit CA then came to United and upgraded on the Airbus within 2 years. He has told me the stories of the **** he has been given about being unsafe and inexperinced because of his seniority number not his background.
you know who is also not experienced? The 25 year 777 FO who no thinks it’s time to be a 777 CA……or is he experienced because of his seniority number?
So are you basing experience off of a seniority number when you talk you your friends that give you a funny look? Or do you follow that up with Many of United’s new hires have been CAs at regionals or other airlines they are just new to United?
Probably not the second one because that would just show your jealousy and ego flaws.
#726
weekends off? Nope...
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 131
I don't know man, I think the other poster has a point.
I am also starting over and trying to explain to people what is actually happening always leaves them what a strange look of concern on their face.
They (the customer) would much rather prefer to have the more experienced pilot sitting in the left seat.
I know I know, seniority and all, but the rest of the world in every other industry heavily weighs experience.
Maybe it's time we change that before another lesson is learned in blood.
I am also starting over and trying to explain to people what is actually happening always leaves them what a strange look of concern on their face.
They (the customer) would much rather prefer to have the more experienced pilot sitting in the left seat.
I know I know, seniority and all, but the rest of the world in every other industry heavily weighs experience.
Maybe it's time we change that before another lesson is learned in blood.
The only FO I’ve had to ask to stop doing something (unsafe and not procedurally correct) had been at the regionals for 15+ years.
Seniority isn’t everything you make it out to be.
#727
Banned
Joined: Dec 2025
Posts: 22
Likes: 6
this post is ignorant and rife with jealousy.
what is your definition of experienced and at what point do the industry pilots adorne you with your “experienced” members only jacket?
Yesterday I rode on a United 321 with a VERY junior CA and it was one of the most professional flight decks I had ever sat in. He was former military then JetBlue for a couple years (FO) then United. If I had been line Checking him it would have been significantly above average. He mentored his new hire FO well and I am glad he is a United Captain.
One of my best friends was a 5 year Spirit CA then came to United and upgraded on the Airbus within 2 years. He has told me the stories of the **** he has been given about being unsafe and inexperinced because of his seniority number not his background.
you know who is also not experienced? The 25 year 777 FO who no thinks it’s time to be a 777 CA……or is he experienced because of his seniority number?
So are you basing experience off of a seniority number when you talk you your friends that give you a funny look? Or do you follow that up with Many of United’s new hires have been CAs at regionals or other airlines they are just new to United?
Probably not the second one because that would just show your jealousy and ego flaws.
what is your definition of experienced and at what point do the industry pilots adorne you with your “experienced” members only jacket?
Yesterday I rode on a United 321 with a VERY junior CA and it was one of the most professional flight decks I had ever sat in. He was former military then JetBlue for a couple years (FO) then United. If I had been line Checking him it would have been significantly above average. He mentored his new hire FO well and I am glad he is a United Captain.
One of my best friends was a 5 year Spirit CA then came to United and upgraded on the Airbus within 2 years. He has told me the stories of the **** he has been given about being unsafe and inexperinced because of his seniority number not his background.
you know who is also not experienced? The 25 year 777 FO who no thinks it’s time to be a 777 CA……or is he experienced because of his seniority number?
So are you basing experience off of a seniority number when you talk you your friends that give you a funny look? Or do you follow that up with Many of United’s new hires have been CAs at regionals or other airlines they are just new to United?
Probably not the second one because that would just show your jealousy and ego flaws.
#728
No one is arguing low seniority on a list is an indicator of inexperience. But damn dude, if people are telling this pilot he is unsafe, I doubt that has anything to do with having a low seniority number. If other pilots are concerned with the safety of their flying and they’re not understanding this is a problem maybe it’s time for pro standards. Second post by a United pilot concerning the competence of their pilots.
look in the mirror buddy YOU are the one that needs a pro standards call.
#729
Banned
Joined: Dec 2025
Posts: 22
Likes: 6
Your fellow pilots are calling him out for being unsafe, how does this have anything to do with seniority?
#730
it’s the dense jealous damaged ego senior pilots who wish their careers had been better. Like yourself!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



