![]() |
Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa
(Post 4025914)
Yes! God I miss when the “stewardesses” were openly objectified.
/s |
Is this like when I tell my kids “I’ll think about it”
|
Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa
(Post 4025914)
Yes! God I miss when the “stewardesses” were openly objectified.
/s We all use what we got to get ahead in life. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 4025950)
Is this like when I tell my kids “I’ll think about it”
https://www.reuters.com/business/sav...ad-2026-04-21/ |
Originally Posted by LNAVVNAVPATH
(Post 4026011)
Looks like the writing is on the wall. |
Originally Posted by LNAVVNAVPATH
(Post 4026011)
"What would someone buy?" Duffy asked. "If no one else wants to buy them, why would we buy them? "By the way if you do do *Spirit, who comes next? Who is the third?" He added: "I care about the employees at Spirit... We also have to be good stewards of the tax dollar. We can't make dumb investments, we can't put taxpayer money that is going to be lost or just forestall the inevitable." "If Spirit goes away, it's better for JetBlue," Duffy said. "If we bail out Spirit, I can't imagine that JetBlue would love that." He is correct on all points. Does it suck, yup. But spending tax dollars to bail out an airline that cant show any direction to correct course is such waste. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 4026033)
"What would someone buy?" Duffy asked. "If no one else wants to buy them, why would we buy them?
"By the way if you do do *Spirit, who comes next? Who is the third?" He added: "I care about the employees at Spirit... We also have to be good stewards of the tax dollar. We can't make dumb investments, we can't put taxpayer money that is going to be lost or just forestall the inevitable." "If Spirit goes away, it's better for JetBlue," Duffy said. "If we bail out Spirit, I can't imagine that JetBlue would love that." He is correct on all points. Does it suck, yup. But spending tax dollars to bail out an airline that cant show any direction to correct course is such waste. |
Originally Posted by LNAVVNAVPATH
(Post 4026011)
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 4026033)
"What would someone buy?" Duffy asked. "If no one else wants to buy them, why would we buy them?
"By the way if you do do *Spirit, who comes next? Who is the third?" He added: "I care about the employees at Spirit... We also have to be good stewards of the tax dollar. We can't make dumb investments, we can't put taxpayer money that is going to be lost or just forestall the inevitable." "If Spirit goes away, it's better for JetBlue," Duffy said. "If we bail out Spirit, I can't imagine that JetBlue would love that." He is correct on all points. Does it suck, yup. But spending tax dollars to bail out an airline that cant show any direction to correct course is such waste. |
Originally Posted by BlueJuicer17
(Post 4026123)
I guess he is right, why burden the tax payers on a product that does not generate revenue. ULCC is dead.
Don't forget, U.S. commercial aviation is the least free market, most regulated industry in this country. Government involvement isn't uncommon. |
Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa
(Post 4025914)
Yes! God I miss when the “stewardesses” were openly objectified.
/s |
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026143)
The role of the Federal Government is to not necessarily maximize financial return. The argument that jetBlue greatly benefits actually might work in Spirit's favor. Spirit's best argument is the downward pressure on airfare they create when they enter a market. jetBlue losing a key competitor won't drive down prices. Helping the little guy has rarely been bad politics.
Don't forget, U.S. commercial aviation is the least free market, most regulated industry in this country. Government involvement isn't uncommon. |
Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa
(Post 4026193)
Dude, I would quit the industry before I willingly flew with you.
😂😂 meanwhile I bet if you guys unknowingly flew together you’d have a blast. APC is funny |
Whack youll pick up your FO when you get to the gate. If you don't, give me a call. Ill fly with you
|
$475 DIP financing due to be paid back July 14th.
Cash on hand 2/28 $560 million and shrinking. 83 days until liquidation. Start the countdown. |
Originally Posted by flier320
(Post 4026230)
$475 DIP financing due to be paid back July 14th.
Cash on hand 2/28 $560 million and shrinking. 83 days until liquidation. Start the countdown. |
Originally Posted by flier320
(Post 4026230)
$475 DIP financing due to be paid back July 14th.
Cash on hand 2/28 $560 million and shrinking. 83 days until liquidation. Start the countdown. https://apple.news/A2zRni2z1SlmNtLQVx80yEA |
Originally Posted by HwkrPlt
(Post 4026169)
Hopefully Kirby uses his influence to have Trump tell Spirit to get bent
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 4026163)
ok, I get it but they “bring down fares” because they keep selling tickets at a loss. Not really a good comparison. Selling tickets at a loss is not a business, it’s a charity.
|
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026256)
The business model was wildly successful pre-NEOs and pre-Covid and pre-Ted.
|
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026256)
The business model was wildly successful pre-NEOs and pre-Covid and pre-Ted.
|
Originally Posted by Smooth at FL450
(Post 4026264)
and most importantly, pre-basic eceonomy
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 4026237)
|
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026256)
The business model was wildly successful pre-NEOs and pre-Covid and pre-Ted.
When you add up the cost of traveling with luggage, it was hardly low cost. You might save $20/ticket over the legacies. Which was not worth the hassle in case of delays/cancellations as Spirit didn't have the capacity/frequency/structure to reaccommodate passengers quickly. People wised up and now either travel with no luggage or they travel with someone else. Or pay an extra $20 flying basic economy with a "more reputable" brand. Lastly, have you looked at the pay of the likes of Ryan Air in Europe? It's significantly less than than their "national main brand" counterparts and they skirt labor laws with the way their bases are structured. When Spirit's labor cost creeped up, it was the last straw, it was no longer a low cost airline, just a crappy one. |
Originally Posted by mudpie
(Post 4026278)
It was wildly successful because it was arguably predatory. American consumers were either unfamiliar with the unbundling concept or the market segment was too stupid to pay attention. That's why ancillary fees were a majority percentage of the revenue.
When you add up the cost of traveling with luggage, it was hardly low cost. You might save $20/ticket over the legacies. Which was not worth the hassle in case of delays/cancellations as Spirit didn't have the capacity/frequency/structure to reaccommodate passengers quickly. People wised up and now either travel with no luggage or they travel with someone else. Or pay an extra $20 flying basic economy with a "more reputable" brand. Lastly, have you looked at the pay of the likes of Ryan Air in Europe? It's significantly less than than their "national main brand" counterparts and they skirt labor laws with the way their bases are structured. When Spirit's labor cost creeped up, it was the last straw, it was no longer a low cost airline, just a crappy one. |
Originally Posted by flier320
(Post 4026269)
In line with the rest of his STUPID decisions lately. But it will buy the company another 6 months. Whoptie do
|
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026282)
Why does Sun Country have such large margins?
Also their labor rate is noticeably less than legacy sized airline. My family actually flies Allegiant quite a bit even though at times it costs more than a legacy. It allows direct flights to vacation spots out of my non major hub city. |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 4026237)
|
Originally Posted by Stankhunt42
(Post 4026295)
Great now the taxpayer has to dump more money on the fire. What a waste.
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 4026237)
Originally Posted by Stankhunt42
(Post 4026295)
Great now the taxpayer has to dump more money on the fire. What a waste.
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4026301)
****ed my tax dollars are going to go to this
"Nearing deal" and "advanced discussions" mean diddly until they "sign on the line that is dotted." |
Blue Horseshoe loves Spirit Aviation.
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4026301)
****ed my tax dollars are going to go to this
|
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4026301)
****ed my tax dollars are going to go to this
|
Originally Posted by mudpie
(Post 4026287)
Sun Country is a niche airline with 500 pilots. They're a "hometown" airline in MSP. They're small and know their market and able to quickly pivot in the seasonal vacation market.
Also their labor rate is noticeably less than legacy sized airline. My family actually flies Allegiant quite a bit even though at times it costs more than a legacy. It allows direct flights to vacation spots out of my non major hub city. |
Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
(Post 4026317)
how much tax payers dollars went to 2 years of funding blocking a B6/NK merger? Were you mad about that too? Or was that beneficial to you?
|
Kirby is still wrong and running his mouth has now really now started to annoy very powerful people. It was only a matter of time before his ego got the best of him.
Glad I don’t work for that weirdo. |
Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa
(Post 4026193)
Dude, I would quit the industry before I willingly flew with you.
|
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 4026334)
And I’d rather sell my Miata collection than fly even one leg with you. 😬
|
Originally Posted by Russs
(Post 4026332)
I love all of the comments justifying spending tax payers money to let Spirit live a few more months. It’s nothing against the pilots…nobody wants to see people out of work…it’s against the company…the one who managed the airline like garbage and gave millions to executives while laying people off and slashing pay….and now it’s everyone else’s problem? I don’t think so.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands