Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Boeing studies pilotless planes... >

Boeing studies pilotless planes...

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Boeing studies pilotless planes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2017, 07:20 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 209
Default

The pilot is still in the loop somewhere, just not in the cockpit.

I wouldn't mind turning a room in my house to a UAV office. Fly 2 PHL-BOS round trips in the morning then head to my hangar, pull the bug smasher out and fly to lunch. Yeah, I'd be interested. No driving to a big airport, no hotels etc.
Sam York is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 07:25 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by Sam York View Post
The pilot is still in the loop somewhere, just not in the cockpit.

I wouldn't mind turning a room in my house to a UAV office. Fly 2 PHL-BOS round trips in the morning then head to my hangar, pull the bug smasher out and fly to lunch. Yeah, I'd be interested. No driving to a big airport, no hotels etc.
So where would the cost savings be if you're still paying for the pilot!? There would be zero economic or safety advantage to this. Give it a rest conspiracy theorists!
C130driver is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 07:33 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse View Post
"Pilotless planes is unpossible! Because eveeel Haxx0rs!"

So, they forgot to encrypt it?

"EVEEL HAXX0RS!!!!!
Not "unpossible", but for passenger airliners, unwise.
You commit the hyperbole of which you accuse others.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 07:47 AM
  #14  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse View Post
"Pilotless planes is unpossible! Because eveeel Haxx0rs!"

So, they forgot to encrypt it?

"EVEEL HAXX0RS!!!!!
Well considered and articulate counterpoint.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 09:20 AM
  #15  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
So where would the cost savings be if you're still paying for the pilot!? There would be zero economic or safety advantage to this. Give it a rest conspiracy theorists!
You are looking at this completely wrong. There will never be a pilotless passenger aircraft. However, the automation will be such that a skilled pilot is no longer necessary, just a technician with a few weeks training. Pay will crater, as management can replace you the same way Northwest did with its mechanics.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 09:42 AM
  #16  
Last To Know First To Go
 
TurboFanMan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 604
Default

The ATC system is not setup to even deal with this technology. I highly doubt they would even sign it, do to the liability. Many many years before this would be seen imo.
TurboFanMan is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:54 AM
  #17  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by Sam York View Post
The pilot is still in the loop somewhere, just not in the cockpit.

I wouldn't mind turning a room in my house to a UAV office. Fly 2 PHL-BOS round trips in the morning then head to my hangar, pull the bug smasher out and fly to lunch. Yeah, I'd be interested. No driving to a big airport, no hotels etc.
This is actually more likely than pure autonomous airliners. Some cost savings since pilots could work more than one flight at a time. Perhaps instead of two pilots on one flight, you could have one pilot doing two flights (staggered departure/arrival times of course).

But the cost of a "secure" comms infrastructure would be vast and epic. It would be hard to get over that initial hump (who's going to make the investment) given the relatively small savings, which would only add up over a very long period.

All things considered, not any time soon.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-19-2017, 01:59 PM
  #18  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by TurboFanMan View Post
The ATC system is not setup to even deal with this technology. I highly doubt they would even sign it, do to the liability. Many many years before this would be seen imo.
A self driving car is orders of magnitude more complicated than an autonomous aircraft. That said, you will still need some kind of pilot on board for security, and data integrity monitor. I would put the odds of single pilot aircraft in the next ten years at 99%, the odds of a pilot-less aircraft is 0% in the next 50 years.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 06-20-2017, 06:27 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

The airline executives said they wanted to operate it. They did not say they would be caught dead as a passenger on board. When one augers in their public relations firm will tell us how sorry they really are.
F4E Mx is offline  
Old 06-20-2017, 07:00 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 461
Default

Originally Posted by TurboFanMan View Post
The ATC system is not setup to even deal with this technology. I highly doubt they would even sign it, do to the liability. Many many years before this would be seen imo.
Privatize it then automate it.

It's the American way!
CrimsonEclipse is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BMEP100
United
109
01-19-2016 02:41 PM
SkyHigh
Major
109
04-12-2006 09:00 AM
Was That For Us?
Major
0
10-20-2005 09:55 PM
Sir James
Major
1
10-09-2005 06:08 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
09-14-2005 10:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices