Search
Notices
Trans States Airlines Regional Airline

Trans States

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2015, 12:36 PM
  #8121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Isn't SAP contingent upon reserve coverage?
Depends on how you negotiate it.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 05-20-2015, 12:43 PM
  #8122  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat View Post
The key part of that statement is COULD. I'm more interested in what I can get now for PBS. A minimum day is a big one as a 4 hour minimum day would have given me 20 more hours of credit last month. Right now we are negotiating for PBS. If people decide they want to explore something else in the next contract that's fine.
If 14 days off per month is the most you can get, how does a 4 hour min day help you? Are you willing to trade pbs for a 4 hour day provision 1 for 1?

Trying to figure a scenario where a 4 hour day minimum helps you? Dead head?
FirstClass is offline  
Old 05-20-2015, 12:49 PM
  #8123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass View Post
If 14 days off per month is the most you can get, how does a 4 hour min day help you? Are you willing to trade pbs for a 4 hour day provision 1 for 1?

Trying to figure a scenario where a 4 hour day minimum helps you? Dead head?
That is how our pairings are built. In my mock PBS bid I had 15 days off.

Really? A 4 hour min day gets me more pay on days when I fly one or two legs for an hour or two hours of credit. It also forces the company to make our days more efficient because they are paying us the minimum day if they build inefficient pairings.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 05-20-2015, 02:00 PM
  #8124  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat View Post
It also forces the company to make our days more efficient because they are paying us the minimum day if they build inefficient pairings.
Yeah that's a good point.
FirstClass is offline  
Old 05-20-2015, 06:01 PM
  #8125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 294
Default

How many aircraft are planned for the Denver Operation and what is the time frame on having it 100% up and running? Is it going pretty senior so far?
Planedrive is offline  
Old 05-20-2015, 06:04 PM
  #8126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
IlliniPilot99's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 577
Default

Originally Posted by Planedrive View Post
How many aircraft are planned for the Denver Operation and what is the time frame on having it 100% up and running? Is it going pretty senior so far?
18 a/c

i believe over the next 18 months and it is going senior right now, that will change over the next few months
IlliniPilot99 is offline  
Old 05-20-2015, 06:10 PM
  #8127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by IlliniPilot99 View Post
18 a/c

i believe over the next 18 months and it is going senior right now, that will change over the next few months
Unless something changes all the new aircraft after May are going to Denver until it gets to 18, then the rest go to Dulles
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 05-20-2015, 07:19 PM
  #8128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: CFI/II/MEI
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass View Post
If 14 days off per month is the most you can get, how does a 4 hour min day help you? Are you willing to trade pbs for a 4 hour day provision 1 for 1?

Trying to figure a scenario where a 4 hour day minimum helps you? Dead head?
For whatever reason there seems to be a lot of trips that look something like this:

Day 1: 5.5 hours
Day 2: 2.5 hours
Day 2: 2.5 hours
Day 4: 4.5 hours

4 hour per day would force them to use us more efficiently or pay up.
Bellanca is offline  
Old 05-21-2015, 12:57 AM
  #8129  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 67
Default

I hope the best for TSA on negotiations but let's be clear. There's a reason TSA was awarded other carriers AC and it's not based on looks.

As a 9.5 year pilot at XJT (8 of that as an FO) I was able to stack $93,000 in my 401k and never even thought about what my Healthcare cost EPO90 BCBS. I know it's a reality of the industry but it hurts that companies like Comair and XJT try to hold a higher standard and pilots continue to hurt the profession, is that mindset so far removed?

I don't blame any one individual so don't take it personal but I'm trying to wrap my head around this quick upgrade/movement concept at PSA, MESA, and TSA?

Again I hope for the sake of the profession that TSA can turn this situation into a win for ALL pilots but I'm not very confident.

I think as far as a career goes getting an upgrade and gaining experience is awesome just not at the expense of other pilots jobs. I am proud that a high number of my XJT comrades are making their way to United in big numbers but as stated not everyone will be as fortunate.

Remember there are 10k CAs already in line for mainline; not saying you can't get out sooner but it's not as easy 1 2 3...

Keep us posted on negotiations and remember, management will always play dumb and act poor when it comes time to pay!

Letu
LeTourneauAlumn is offline  
Old 05-21-2015, 04:27 AM
  #8130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by LeTourneauAlumn View Post
I hope the best for TSA on negotiations but let's be clear. There's a reason TSA was awarded other carriers AC and it's not based on looks.
It really doesn't have as much to do with your contract as it does with your longevity. Trans States already has equal or higher pay rates than XJT but a lot lower longevity. Yes, TSA doesn't have as good of soft pay and health insurance but again not what really hurts XJT.

On average at TSA, you have a first/second year CA flying with a first year FO which is a combined hourly rate of $86.91/$89.34 versus XJT flying the same aircraft with a 12 year CA and a 7 year FO of $128/hr. Not to mention more XJT CAs are likely to be older with a family which means higher insurance costs even if you had the exact same plan. If you raised TSA first year pay for CA to $70 and FO to $40, you would still be cheaper than XJT by $18 in a combined hourly rate.

Compass' hourly pay is much higher than RAHs but I bet you will find they are much cheaper flying the same aircraft. Compass has first/second year FOs flying with 3-4 year CAs while RAH has 7 year FOs flying with 12 year CAs. Even if you give RAH more new flying, you will still have a higher longevity than Compass as the FOs that will upgrade will immediately jump to the 7 year CA payscale. Its the reason BB is dragging his feet on a new contract as he can't figure out how to give the pilots a raise without still being more expensive than Compass.

Too high of an average longevity at a regional will always make it too expensive compared to a regional with a large number of first year pilots. Its the reason you shouldn't make a career out of a regional because once too many pilots do, the whipsaw starts again.
flyingreasemnky is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
forgot to bid
Major
37
02-27-2020 08:58 PM
rballTy
Part 135
5
02-17-2020 02:21 PM
fastmulti
GoJet
129
07-08-2010 06:20 PM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices