New TSA Thread
12-23-2016, 08:06 PM
#1411
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 996
Originally Posted by DegeReguard
No kidding its a silly idea. There is speculation bassed on some semblance of logic and creative interpretation and then there is stuff like this.
Why are people so eager to buy into it and were the crap did it come from?
Why are people so eager to buy into it and were the crap did it come from?
12-23-2016, 08:39 PM
#1412
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Originally Posted by Flyhayes
I agree that United is a little late to the game with the wholly owned situation. And eventually will be in UA's best interest to evolve the CPP into something better. Although I don't think that it will happen anytime soon since there is no slowdown of new hires both at UA and C5 (depending on why you think the CPP is meant to accomplish).
12-23-2016, 08:41 PM
#1413
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Originally Posted by DegeReguard
Well yay, I guess my career is made now, lottery won. Ill be a 777 captain in no time.
Time to throw out my logbook.
Time to throw out my logbook.
I say we hold out for DOH integration...senior guys go from the ERJ to a 777
12-23-2016, 08:42 PM
#1414
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Originally Posted by No Lies
UA already put money into and has a large ownership in C5 (just under 50%). A couple of C5 board members are from UA (2 of 5) and you will never see anything official from either company. That's the reason for the under 50% ownership by UA. A lot of key players at C5 are from UA or CO.
We were also told by the boss that UA will not outright buy a regional. It appears that was done once before under the CO name and it did not turn out very well. They seem to want something that they can wash their hands of if they need to.
We were also told by the boss that UA will not outright buy a regional. It appears that was done once before under the CO name and it did not turn out very well. They seem to want something that they can wash their hands of if they need to.
12-24-2016, 05:29 AM
#1416
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 511
Originally Posted by FlyingKat
C5 may be private, but UAL is not, and any significant investment in another entity would have to be disclosed to the stockholders. And C5 wouldn't be the first regional to have mainline management on its board of directors. Its happened many times before.
12-24-2016, 06:04 AM
#1417
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,126
Originally Posted by jacburn
That's why 40ish% is not significant and why they chose that amount.
12-24-2016, 01:26 PM
#1418
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Originally Posted by jacburn
That's why 40ish% is not significant and why they chose that amount.
12-24-2016, 07:33 PM
#1419
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: EMB145 Captain
Posts: 193
Originally Posted by FlyingKat
I say we hold out for DOH integration...senior guys go from the ERJ to a 777
Oh yeah totally. Good call, I mean pilot shortage right. Thats just around the corner. Legacy tsa captains will be picking airplanes like a guy picks a sandwich. Just gotra hold on to the ole medical.
#worththewait
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
