Search

Notices

Sfo 777

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2017 | 12:41 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
Did he pass along that the 400 base in ORD would close for 18 months then reopen? Did he tell you about the great plan to grow IAH 787 in winter '15 then redeploy the whole fleet to West Coast 6 months later? With such a stellar track record there is no reason to doubt they have a clear big picture plan indicated by your inside source.
It's not exactly an inside source and it's not exactly a secret that they want to close Guam. Hey, it's not my decision. I don't lose sleep if you don't want to believe it. I hope you're right. It makes no difference to me if you believe it or not.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 12:42 PM
  #22  
Half wing's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 516
Likes: 3
From: 787 right
Default

Gum will stay open along with Iah 777. Cleveland will also stay open. This is from a legit source in the brain trust.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 03:24 PM
  #23  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
My days are always bright. Of course these positions needed to be filled somehow. 30 Captains and no first officers? That means they either expect to staff the FO's by -400 folks bumping to the 777 right seat OR forcing folks there by bumping SFO 787. I'm expecting 787 west coast bumps.

In the next two years these BES's won't exist:

CLE
LAX 777
GUM
IAH 787
IAH 777
CLE and GUM can easily be absorbed by other bases. LAX 777 doesn't really fly anything. IAH 777 is likely next. All of the above makes sense. Its just going to add flying to other bases and more profit sharing.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 03:44 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 985
Likes: 65
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
CLE and GUM can easily be absorbed by other bases. LAX 777 doesn't really fly anything. IAH 777 is likely next. All of the above makes sense. Its just going to add flying to other bases and more profit sharing.
So the 67 will pick up all of IAH international, or is UAL going to cancel all international flying out of the 4th largest city in the US?
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 04:20 PM
  #25  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by jdt30
So the 67 will pick up all of IAH international, or is UAL going to cancel all international flying out of the 4th largest city in the US?
I wouldn't be to worried about some baseless wild rumor.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 04:28 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jdt30
So the 67 will pick up all of IAH international, or is UAL going to cancel all international flying out of the 4th largest city in the US?
Nah W's with zero reserves backup to at least 3 daily long haul markets makes more sense. Just like it does to use int DH's and hotels to acclimate to cover entire Guam operation. These guys are geniuses.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 04:30 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 985
Likes: 65
Default

Sorry, forgot the tongue in cheek emoji.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 09:00 PM
  #28  
HuggyU2's Avatar
Get me outta here...
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Boeing right seat
Default

Speaking of Guam... why do Guam-based United pilots get $3000/month extra?
Because it is that much more expensive to live there than San Francisco or Washington DC?
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 10:21 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2
Speaking of Guam... why do Guam-based United pilots get $3000/month extra?
Because it is that much more expensive to live there than San Francisco or Washington DC?
Because it's in the contract, not because the company just offered it up.
Reply
Old 06-27-2017 | 03:55 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Default

So if GUM closes you think the company is just gonna be eating a ton of 7:45 DH's back and forth from HNL to position crews on both sides of every pairing? No way. There's no way they could get everyone where they need to be by starting and ending everyone via the hopper.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lurchi
United
20
06-26-2017 06:38 AM
vagabond
Technical
1
08-01-2010 11:40 AM
AirbusA320
Cargo
3
08-30-2009 06:10 AM
BOYCAPTAIN
Major
16
04-14-2008 04:52 PM
ryane946
JetBlue
1
01-10-2007 06:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices