Notices

New Displacement Out

Old 07-08-2017 | 01:14 PM
  #21  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

Originally Posted by EjetTaxi
Pepperdine Farms remembers
(almost) for the win...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
wshzz.jpg (28.9 KB, 419 views)
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 02:15 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Revisionist history at its finest and please remind me which airline was receiving their pre-merger, previously ordered airframes at the same time?
Where were these airframes being deployed? Who was gonna pay for them? No matter. I know first hand that Bumpity Bumps are the great equalizer. They put you EXACTLY where you wanna be. No vacancy needed. Bring em on. Keep em coming. 👍 😎
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 04:29 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Where were these airframes being deployed? Who was gonna pay for them? No matter. I know first hand that Bumpity Bumps are the great equalizer. They put you EXACTLY where you wanna be. No vacancy needed. Bring em on. Keep em coming. 👍 😎
im not a big fan of massive displacements. They disadvantage the pilots that are not in closing BES whom are patiently awaiting upgrade or wb. For instance, the junior position on sfo 787 ca is 3000 (due to fence). The junior position on the 777 sfo is 2000. 2000 is realistic number for holding wb Capt in sfo. You will see a lot of 2000-3000 seniority pilots bump into sfo. The end result is that more pilots who are too junior for the position will be taking wb Capt slots thus keeping the more senior pilots whom aren't subject to displacement from being awarded in a future vacancy.
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 06:18 PM
  #24  
davessn763's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by untied
Remember when all those junior CAL guys got 787 Captain due to the fences?

That's about to be fixed.
L-CAL scabs will be bumping into widebody positions throughout the system. This hasn't "fixed" anything. There probably won't even be bumps from SFO and LAX 787 CA due to retirements and the expanding SFO 777 base.

We, you know UCH pilots, are losing widebody jobs and hulls and you are cheering?

This is a systemwide shrinkage of our fleet and flying. The stagnation that LAX, ORD, and IAH have seen will now be the reality for SFO, welcome to the club.

We are screwed as a pilot group because of this kind of attitude. This type of shortsidedness resulted in two contracts with the 767-300 paying narrow body rates, pure genius!
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 06:59 PM
  #25  
Yak02's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: B-787 Captain
Default

Maybe it is time for a Longevity based pay system and ditch the archaic Weight based system we have had for decades. Then nobody chases airplanes and bases which destroys their QOL for money.

Also, who cares what airplanes the company buys, fly the airplane that fits your butt. The company spends the same amount of money on pilot payroll and buys the correct airplane for their mission and doesn't have to figure in the pilot Drama.

Of course, this would be a big change for ALPA and it wouldn't fit into their Pattern Bargining scheme so it will never be discussed.

Stay the Course and hold the line!
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 07:11 PM
  #26  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Yak02
Maybe it is time for a Longevity based pay system and ditch the archaic Weight based system we have had for decades. Then nobody chases airplanes and bases which destroys their QOL for money.

Also, who cares what airplanes the company buys, fly the airplane that fits your butt. The company spends the same amount of money on pilot payroll and buys the correct airplane for their mission and doesn't have to figure in the pilot Drama.

Of course, this would be a big change for ALPA and it wouldn't fit into their Pattern Bargining scheme so it will never be discussed.

Stay the Course and hold the line!

Spoken like someone junior trying to hold onto their seat.
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 07:12 PM
  #27  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by davessn763
L-CAL scabs will be bumping into widebody positions throughout the system. This hasn't "fixed" anything. There probably won't even be bumps from SFO and LAX 787 CA due to retirements and the expanding SFO 777 base.

We, you know UCH pilots, are losing widebody jobs and hulls and you are cheering?

This is a systemwide shrinkage of our fleet and flying. The stagnation that LAX, ORD, and IAH have seen will now be the reality for SFO, welcome to the club.

We are screwed as a pilot group because of this kind of attitude. This type of shortsidedness resulted in two contracts with the 767-300 paying narrow body rates, pure genius!

How do you figure system wide shrinkage there Dave? Also how are we losing WB jobs?
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 07:16 PM
  #28  
davessn763's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
How do you figure system wide shrinkage there Dave? Also how are we losing WB jobs?
Look at the active pilot totals on the last 4 vacancy bids. We are shrinking.
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 07:41 PM
  #29  
Yak02's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: B-787 Captain
Default

Yup, are we all not trying to hold on to our seats? Some of us have been around for a lot longer than others, and have seen have fast the money losing airplanes can disappear in a heartbeat.

Oscar made an interesting comment in the Pacific a few weaks ago. "We have way more International Widebody airplanes than we have profitable wide body routes, and not enough domestic airplanes for all the profitable domestic flying." He doesn't see that changing in the very near future. Way too much competition from foreign carriers.

We need to follow the money, not the airplane.
Reply
Old 07-08-2017 | 08:11 PM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 305
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
Pepperidge?
Damn auto correct lol
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andy
United
238
06-19-2017 10:44 AM
Birddog
United
55
08-15-2014 11:46 AM
withthatsaid182
Regional
92
03-16-2009 09:28 PM
coldpilot
Regional
59
01-02-2009 08:46 AM
Luckydawg
Cargo
38
11-14-2007 04:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices