Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
C-Series still a possibility? >

C-Series still a possibility?

Search
Notices

C-Series still a possibility?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2017, 07:06 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash View Post
Do you want them to go to a Regional???
As long as they only have 50 seats, or in limited cases, 76 seats, then I don't care. It doesn't seem like the most efficient way to operate that jet though.

If it's to be operated as designed, that is with about 100 seats, it contractually can't go to the regionals.

Section 6 is coming and never underestimate the stupidity of s crowd. If we relent on scope, it'll be the start of another decades long decline.
awax is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 07:37 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash View Post
Do you want them to go to a Regional???
You do realize if UAL orders some of these it opens the door for more outsourced 76 seaters right? Getting these would be a lose/lose IMHO.
RSRVWINDSURFR is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 07:51 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,807
Default

Originally Posted by CLazarus View Post
It's funny, Flight Global took one little paragraph from this week's Ops Update and spun it into a story. I read the same paragraph the other day and didn't think it said anything substantial whatsoever. That all said, I agree wholeheartedly with Winston that it is total b.s. when folks pass along our internal comms to the media. Tough to negotiate a good price if a seller thinks he has an easy sale, might as well be paying out of our own pockets. Shame.

Meanwhile, I will say one thing for our current management, I am extremely confident they will not pay the $80m sticker price for the C Series if they pursue a purchase. Kirby don't play that (see also - A350 purchase). BA brought up a complaint this Spring against Bombardier with the U.S. Dept of Commerce alleging that Delta is paying less than $20 mil a copy for theirs. Whatever Delta paid, I doubt we'd pay much more than DAL if we decided to buy them.

And now, I am eagerly counting down to David Puddy's latest CS-100/300 sales pitch! 3...2...1...
3...2...1. I'll spare you the normal sales pitch. UAL is considered too close to Boeing, so, I imagine Kirby won't order the CSeries even though it makes TREMENDOUS sense to provide an aircraft type that:

1. Provides the best route flexibility of any aircraft in its class
2. Provides the best passenger ergonomics of any aircraft in its class
3. Is a clean-sheet design that provides unmatched efficiency in its class with the GTFs and improved aerodynamics - the E2 is an E190 with new engines, a few extra rows and a revamped wing - wow!!!!

I doubt anyone pays list price anymore - especially for a volume order. If UAL were to order the CSeries, Delta and Air Canada will be flying CSeries versions and any potential operational kinks would be worked out by then.

Let's hope UAL orders the E2 (to also appease Boeing who is very nervous about a potential bigger CS500 version from Bombardier) and you guys can enjoy flying regional routes in that tight cockpit with those annoying ram horns for the next 2-3 decades. Have fun!
David Puddy is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 07:52 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Half wing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Default

If we bought the cs 100/300 at a 1:1 ratio the blended rate would be about the same as Delta's 717 rate. The Captain CS100/300 blended rate is also about the same as our wide body FO rate. I agree though, let's get the rate up for these in the next contract. At least the CS300 pays what a 319 does. Makes sense because they are about the same size.
Half wing is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 07:57 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,231
Default

Unless they can "Pull a Tesla", and get the Canadian government to subsidize their money losing product, they are going to lose, and lose badly.
They've already done that. Quebec owns 49.5% of the program and they are now actively shopping for another investor and the Chinese state owned COMAC are the most likely suiters.
It's a welfare program at this point.
trip is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 08:11 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 373
Default

This where Boeing is dropping the ball. They need a 737 replacement. Instead of developing one just buy it! Just buy Bombardier and take the Cs100/300 and make a 500,700,900, 900ER (it's going to need a tail wheel!)...,,and then make a Max10,11,12 and so on.
82spukram is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 08:53 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,195
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
As long as they only have 50 seats, or in limited cases, 76 seats, then I don't care. It doesn't seem like the most efficient way to operate that jet though.

If it's to be operated as designed, that is with about 100 seats, it contractually can't go to the regionals.

Section 6 is coming and never underestimate the stupidity of s crowd. If we relent on scope, it'll be the start of another decades long decline.
$1000/hr, 100hr guarantee.... A single inch of scope relief would be an absolute no from me. (I'm sure some here would sell out their own kids for a few more dollars)

What good are payrates without a job?
Grumble is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 09:37 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Default

Heard the Max 11 will require a tail wheel endorsement! 🙄🙄
flightmedic01 is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 12:25 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by CLazarus View Post
It's funny, Flight Global took one little paragraph from this week's Ops Update and spun it into a story. I read the same paragraph the other day and didn't think it said anything substantial whatsoever. That all said, I agree wholeheartedly with Winston that it is total b.s. when folks pass along our internal comms to the media. Tough to negotiate a good price if a seller thinks he has an easy sale, might as well be paying out of our own pockets. Shame.

Meanwhile, I will say one thing for our current management, I am extremely confident they will not pay the $80m sticker price for the C Series if they pursue a purchase. Kirby don't play that (see also - A350 purchase). BA brought up a complaint this Spring against Bombardier with the U.S. Dept of Commerce alleging that Delta is paying less than $20 mil a copy for theirs. Whatever Delta paid, I doubt we'd pay much more than DAL if we decided to buy them.

And now, I am eagerly counting down to David Puddy's latest CS-100/300 sales pitch! 3...2...1...
Or maybe Mgmt leaks it itself to apply a bit more pressure on Boeing/Airbus to sharpen their pencils for a deal.
full of luv is offline  
Old 08-22-2017, 01:18 PM
  #20  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash View Post
Do you want them to go to a Regional???
Not really but when Deltas guys are making $40/hour more than we are flying the exact same aircraft, they suck. The 737 order would have been just fine and paid us at, gasp, industry average rates.
757Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
harlanfreedman
Hiring News
16
11-14-2016 12:42 AM
shoelu
Hangar Talk
14
11-19-2011 04:10 PM
stbloc
Regional
95
04-28-2010 08:45 AM
fireman0174
Major
5
02-19-2007 04:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices