Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Three JS listed, two JS on Airbus >

Three JS listed, two JS on Airbus

Search
Notices

Three JS listed, two JS on Airbus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2018, 05:49 AM
  #21  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 22
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
Can’t tell you how many times I’ve see his happen....

Coulda been right at 1 hour prior, agent was there and the guy just asked to go down.

Had he waited, he would have held a seat in the back. Or worse, on the bus/75 or 76/777 when they used to do more domestic hub to hub and 2 guys go down RIGHT AWAY that could have held seats in the back.

As a nonrev standby, how do you “hold” a seat in the back regardless of seniority? Not sure as to what you’re referring to.
CaptGringo is offline  
Old 05-29-2018, 08:53 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,674
Default

Originally Posted by CaptGringo View Post
As a nonrev standby, how do you “hold” a seat in the back regardless of seniority? Not sure as to what you’re referring to.
Let’s say the flight is showing -5, you see the names on the list and theirs is listed twice.

Once for SA, other for JS.

By the time all the no shows and misconnects were accounted for and the non-revs start getting cleared, and sure as sh1t it got down to where their name WAS on the SA list.

IOW, they could have held a seat in the back, yet just took the JS and sent down without even waiting for it to pan out.
John Carr is offline  
Old 05-29-2018, 09:16 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetBlast77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 661
Default

Originally Posted by Snyper00 View Post
Am I the only one that thinks that our jumpseat rules are complete garbage? Every other airline does FCFS within a time window and we’re the only place where a senior guy can list 10 mins prior to push and bump you off. Which has happened to me more than once already. Glad we’re on the same team! 🙄
I completely agree. We should at least have a cut off time. It’s absolutely ridiculous and stupid IMO
JetBlast77 is offline  
Old 05-29-2018, 03:20 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,029
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77 View Post
I completely agree. We should at least have a cut off time. It’s absolutely ridiculous and stupid IMO
We used to have a 20 minute cut off at s-UAL (should be NLT 20) but just like how we now have with the should requirement to meet in the FPA before the first leg of a trip, there were individuals that argued that it was written as “should, not shall” so they didn’t think it applied to them. Eventually it was dropped.
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 05-29-2018, 04:21 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 66
Default

Another suck is asking a Delta or Southwest pilot if they would mind sitting in the flight attendant jumpseat so you can take their cockpit jump. UA pilots o can not reciprocate because that is the United flight attendant's jumpseat and not United's. The rules do need a visit. This crap is antiquated. Not sure what the argument is on allowing FAs in our jumpseat. They are up there already.
Opelmanta is offline  
Old 05-30-2018, 04:03 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
rightside02's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Airbus 320 Right Seat
Posts: 1,440
Default

Couldnt agree more . This old school mind set needs to go ... most airlines allow this .
rightside02 is offline  
Old 05-30-2018, 04:49 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by Opelmanta View Post
Another suck is asking a Delta or Southwest pilot if they would mind sitting in the flight attendant jumpseat so you can take their cockpit jump. UA pilots o can not reciprocate because that is the United flight attendant's jumpseat and not United's. The rules do need a visit. This crap is antiquated. Not sure what the argument is on allowing FAs in our jumpseat. They are up there already.
I think it is best to refer to it as the "cabin" jumpseat not the flight attendant jumpseat.

I agree that the pilots should have access to the cabin jumpseat with a priority given to UA flight attendants. Considering that it is an empty seat, with the ability to get a crewmember in position to perform duty for the company, it seems crazy that the airline would choose to restrict this.
I also agree that we should allow a reservation system for the pilots that allows us to guarantee the js. Once again the company benefits because the pilot gets to work and it allows alternative planning for everyone well in advance of 10 minutes prior to push.
And it relieves the agent of one more last minute duty.

My feelings about changing the jumpseat system seemed to be in the minority in the last thread this was discussed.
RomeoHotel is offline  
Old 05-30-2018, 04:53 AM
  #28  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 22
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
Let’s say the flight is showing -5, you see the names on the list and theirs is listed twice.

Once for SA, other for JS.

By the time all the no shows and misconnects were accounted for and the non-revs start getting cleared, and sure as sh1t it got down to where their name WAS on the SA list.

IOW, they could have held a seat in the back, yet just took the JS and sent down without even waiting for it to pan out.

But then wouldn’t that seat that the senior guy would have had in the back just go to the next guy down the list? Still gets filled by the next most senior non rev right?
CaptGringo is offline  
Old 05-30-2018, 05:01 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sydney5316's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by CaptGringo View Post
But then wouldn’t that seat that the senior guy would have had in the back just go to the next guy down the list? Still gets filled by the next most senior non rev right?
You are correct. This is just a pilots looking out for pilots strategy.
sydney5316 is offline  
Old 05-30-2018, 05:06 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by CaptGringo View Post
But then wouldn’t that seat that the senior guy would have had in the back just go to the next guy down the list? Still gets filled by the next most senior non rev right?
If the senior jumpseater for example was an 87' hire date he/she might be way up the list for a seat in the cabin. Meanwhile the junior jumpseater is say a 15' hire date. Way down the list for a cabin seat. The normal etiquette is for the senior guy to stand by for a seat in the cabin to allow the junior jumpseater an opportunity to occupy the jumpseat.
Getting the most senior non rev on in your example would often not be the junior pilot but someone else.
RomeoHotel is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Major
4
09-08-2009 01:06 AM
andy171773
Major
56
06-22-2009 12:48 PM
Outlaw2097
Hangar Talk
1
05-08-2009 09:50 AM
vagabond
Technical
11
04-03-2007 05:52 AM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
08-07-2005 11:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices