![]() |
I did IAD-LHR-IAD last summer unaugmented on the 787 a couple times and it sucked. Both flights coming back ended up blocking almost 9hrs.
|
Originally Posted by RSRVWINDSURFR
(Post 2652225)
I did IAD-LHR-IAD last summer unaugmented on the 787 a couple times and it sucked. Both flights coming back ended up blocking almost 9hrs.
|
Originally Posted by O2pilot
(Post 2652240)
Its amazing that a guy who flips burgers can’t be forced to work 8 hours straight without at least 4 breaks, but airline pilots can be forced to work that long with no break.
Forced? Flipping burgers/ flying an airliner..... I can see the similarities::rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by YAKflyer
(Post 2651856)
Forgive me....I'm a bit of a lurker here because my son is one of you.
None of you really know what hell is. Nine years ago I was pushing metal for Air India flying the 777 and one of my frequent routes was FRA to ORD. My copilot (if you can call him/her that) was typically 21 or 22 years old and had no more than 500 hours total time and Air India did not authorize/allow copilots to land the jet. Air India didn't augment until scheduled time went over 9:59 which it never did, so in the winter actual flight times were often well over 10 hours. BTW when you hear Air India check in with ORD approach I would give them a little extra room. When you fly a 777 from FRA to ORD essentially by yourself in the middle of winter....only then....will you understand what real hell is. I see your Air India job and raise it with a crappy old DC-8 flying non sched international for 10 hours. Then doing a Pt 91 reposition for another 8 hours with no breaks, no food, no glass, no sel call, no GPS, and a narcoleptic/alcoholic/geriatric flight engineer with a bad attitude. |
Originally Posted by O2pilot
(Post 2652240)
Its amazing that a guy who flips burgers can’t be forced to work 8 hours straight without at least 4 breaks, but airline pilots can be forced to work that long with no break.
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 2652267)
😄
I see your Air India job and raise it with a crappy old DC-8 flying non sched international for 10 hours. Then doing a Pt 91 reposition for another 8 hours with no breaks, no food, no glass, no sel call, no GPS, and a narcoleptic/alcoholic/geriatric flight engineer with a bad attitude. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2652057)
Well, as I previously stated, LCAL flew those transatlantic routes unaugmented. They'd deadhead a pilot eastbound (their contract paid deadheading less than on duty) and fly augmented back to EWR. So this isn't new ground.
Personally, I'd prefer to be the flying pilot rather than the Bunkie and I think most others feel the same way. I just don't see unaugmented transatlantic flights making the 787 go junior in EWR. |
Originally Posted by IAHB756
(Post 2652318)
I’ll say it is rough when delayed and or weather plagued. Having the third set of eyes is a big help. Heck, California to Hawaii is nothing compared to North Atlantic un-augmented flying. I do Hawaii flying in a freaking 737 each month for pete’s sake.
|
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 2652278)
Same job, different plane. I was told “its international, you don’t need rest providing you don’t block over 12 hours of 121 time.” One freight outfit figured out that that the domestic rest requirement of 8 hours didn’t have to be continuous. As long as your breaks added up to 8 hours you were legal, and time spent in local transportation was part of your rest as the hotel van tried aimlessly to find the freight ramp. Oh the memories. Not enough booze in the bottle to wash away some of the past.
|
Originally Posted by webecheck
(Post 2652374)
Bingo. A delay changes the ballgame on an all nighter thats up to the unaugmented limits. Those Hawaii Denver redeyes are bruuuuuutal... Add a 3 hr delay for inbound aircraft, oh dear God.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands